SPECT imaging for breast cancer staging

被引:0
|
作者
Piperkova, E
Gavrilov, I
Grueva, A
Milev, A
机构
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Accurate staging in breast cancer, including tumour sizing and the assessment of nodal and distant metastases, is required in order to plan surgery and post-operative therapy. Medical imaging techniques have made an important contribution to the diagnosis of carcinoma of the breast and the evaluation of local, regional and distant metastases. The study is aimed at establishing certain aspects of the diagnostic importance and priority of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging in breast cancer. SPECT was carried out just after planar scintigraphy and then after intravenous injection of different radiopharmaceuticals in 45 women with histologically confirmed post-operation breast cancer. In 21 patients under loco-regional control of the disease before and/or after surgery, planar mammoscintigraphy and SPECT were conducted after intravenous injection of Tc-99(m)-MIBI (methoxyisobutyl isonitrile) or Tc-99(m)-anti-CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen) monoclonal antibody (MoAb). Bone SPECT was carried out in 24 patients when whole body bone scintigraphy was unable to determine the exact localization of bone metastatic lesions in the skull, thorax and pelvis. The results suggest that SPECT with Tc-99(m)-MIBI and Tc-99(m)-anti-CEA MoAb has high sensitivity and improves the results of conventional planar scintigraphy for breast cancer detection. Breast SPECT is a preferable method for tumour and lymph node imaging because of the excellent separation of the deep breast structures from the myocardium in the left breast and of the right breast from the liver, thus improving the resolution of small, deep seated lesions. SPECT improves breast cancer staging, and determines the tumour, nodule and metastasis categories, which are important for the treatment strategy and prognosis of the disease.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:119 / 128
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Breast cancer imaging with PET and SPECT agents: an in vivo comparison
    Palmedo, H
    Hensel, J
    Reinhardt, M
    Von Mallek, D
    Matthies, A
    Biersack, HJ
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2002, 29 (08) : 809 - 815
  • [22] Patterns in breast cancer staging imaging: Are we choosing wisely?
    Barlow, Brett
    Williams, Courtney
    Gilbert, Aidan
    Watkins, Stacey M.
    Rocque, Gabrielle Betty
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (30)
  • [23] Imaging Bone Metastases in Breast Cancer: Staging and Response Assessment
    Cook, Gary J. R.
    Azad, Gurdip K.
    Goh, Vicky
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 57 : 27S - 33S
  • [24] Breast Cancer: Role of SPECT and PET in Imaging Bone Metastases
    Ben-Haim, Simona
    Israel, Ora
    SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2009, 39 (06) : 408 - 415
  • [25] The Usefulness of SPECT/CT Imaging for SN Mapping in Breast Cancer
    Ozalp, E.
    Do, M. T.
    Baeyens, L.
    Masson, T.
    Bergmann, P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2013, 40 : S461 - S461
  • [26] Will PET/CT supersede conventional imaging for staging breast cancer?
    Syed, A.
    Mo, J.
    Jain, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 105 : 150 - 151
  • [27] Staging the Axilla in Early Breast Cancer Will Imaging Replace Surgery?
    Gentilini, Oreste
    Veronesi, Umberto
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2015, 1 (08) : 1031 - 1032
  • [28] Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Axillary Staging in Patients With Breast Cancer
    Mortellaro, Vincent E.
    Marshall, Julia
    Singer, Lauren
    Hochwald, Steven N.
    Chang, Myron
    Copeland, Edward M.
    Grobmyer, Stephen R.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 30 (02) : 309 - 312
  • [29] Imaging modality in staging of patients with metastatic recurrence of breast cancer
    Balu-Maestro, Catherine
    Caramella, Thomas
    Zwarthoed, Colette
    Taourel, Patrice
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2015, 25 (01) : 16 - 21
  • [30] Current status of PET in breast cancer imaging, staging, and therapy
    Wahl, RL
    SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 36 (03) : 250 - 260