Comparative gastric motility study of EnterraTM Therapy and neural gastric electrical stimulation in an acute canine model

被引:5
|
作者
Arriagada, A. [1 ]
Jurkov, A. S. [1 ]
Neshev, E. [2 ]
Muench, G. [3 ]
Mintchev, M. P. [1 ,2 ]
Andrews, C. N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Fac Med, Div Gastroenterol, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Fac Vet Med, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
来源
NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY | 2011年 / 23卷 / 03期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
electrical stimulation; Enterra; gastric motility; gastroparesis; gastric electrical stimulation; neural gastrointestinal electrical stimulation; obesity; MICROPROCESSOR-CONTROLLED MOVEMENT; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; REFRACTORY GASTROPARESIS; SYMPTOMATIC RESPONSE; OBESITY; STOMACH; NEUROSTIMULATION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2982.2010.01636.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is an avenue for treating gastroparesis and obesity by controlling gastric motility using electrically mediated gastric contractions. Neural gastrointestinal electrical stimulation (NGES) is a GES modality capable of producing strong lumen-occluding local gastric contractions. Conversely, EnterraTM Therapy, a commercial implantable gastric electrical stimulator, has been utilized to treat symptoms of gastroparesis, but its nominal electrical parameters are not capable of generating lumen-occluding contractions. However, comparative studies between these two stimulation modalities are lacking. Methods Strain gauge transducers complemented by endoscopic monitoring have been utilized to register gastric contractions invoked with NGES and Enterra neurostimulators in four acute dogs. Mucosal and serosal electrode implantations, 'nominal' and 'maximum' electrical parameters, and longitudinal and transverse electrode placements have been tested with each neurostimulator type. Key Results Strong lumen-occluding, circumferential contractions were induced with a wide variety of NGES parameters utilizing both transverse and longitudinal electrode configurations from the serosal side of the stomach. Similarly, local gastric contractions were observed with the Enterra neurostimulator programmed at its 'maximum' electrical parameters but only when utilizing transverse serosal electrode implantation. Under 'maximum' electrical parameters Enterra was not capable of producing registerable gastric contractions with longitudinally implanted serosal electrodes. Mucosal electrode implantations did not result in GES-invoked gastric contractions in both stimulation modalities. Conclusions & Inferences Enterra Therapy is capable of producing gastric contractions under 'maximum' parameters and transverse electrode configuration. Neural gastrointestinal electrical stimulation produces stronger, lumen-occluding contractions under a wider range of electrode configurations and parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / e122
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effects and mechanisms of long-pulse gastric electrical stimulation on canine gastric tone and accommodation
    Xing, JH
    Chen, JDZ
    NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2006, 18 (02): : 136 - 143
  • [32] Gastric electrical-stimulation effects on canine gastric emptying, food intake, and body weight
    Xing, JH
    Brody, F
    Brodsky, J
    Rosen, M
    Larive, B
    Ponsky, J
    Soffer, E
    OBESITY RESEARCH, 2003, 11 (01): : 41 - 47
  • [33] Gastric and sacral electrical stimulation for motility disorders-A clinical perspective
    Desprez, Charlotte
    Leroi, Anne-Marie
    Gourcerol, Guillaume
    NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2024,
  • [34] Wavelet analysis in a canine model of gastric electrical uncoupling
    Cintra, RJDS
    Tchervensky, IV
    Dimitrov, VS
    Mintchev, MP
    PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2004, 25 (06) : 1355 - 1369
  • [35] Gastric electrical stimulation does not significantly affect canine gastric acid secretion and 24-hour gastric pH
    Xing, JH
    Rosen, M
    Brody, F
    Soffer, EE
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2004, 49 (01) : 48 - 53
  • [36] Gastric Electrical Stimulation Does Not Significantly Affect Canine Gastric Acid Secretion and 24-Hour Gastric pH
    Jin-Hong Xing
    Michael Rosen
    Frederick Brody
    Edy E. Soffer
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2004, 49 : 48 - 53
  • [37] Synchronized gastric electrical stimulation improves gastric motility in non-obese mice with diabetic gastroparesis
    Song, G.
    Chen, J. D. Z.
    NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2007, 19 (05): : 431 - 431
  • [38] Severe Gastroparesis: Medical Therapy or Gastric Electrical Stimulation
    Reddymasu, Savio C.
    Sarosiek, Irene
    McCallum, Richard W.
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2010, 8 (02) : 117 - 124
  • [39] Neural gastrointestinal electrical stimulation enhances colonic motility in a chronic canine model of delayed colonic transit
    Sanmiguel, C. P.
    Casillas, S.
    Senagore, A.
    Mintchev, M. P.
    Soffer, E. E.
    NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2006, 18 (08): : 647 - 653
  • [40] Therapeutic potential of gastric electrical stimulation for obesity and its possible mechanisms - A preliminary canine study
    Ouyang, H
    Yin, JY
    Chen, JDZ
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2003, 48 (04) : 698 - 705