How to Verify a Quantum Computation

被引:33
|
作者
Broadbent, Anne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
complexity theory; cryptography; interactive proofs; quantum computing; quantum interactive proofs; quantum cryptography; UNIVERSAL;
D O I
10.4086/toc.2018.v014a011
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
We give a new theoretical solution to a leading-edge experimental challenge, namely to the verification of quantum computations in the regime of high computational complexity. Our results are given in the language of quantum interactive proof systems. Specifically, we show that any language in BQP has a quantum interactive proof system with a polynomial-time classical verifier (who can also prepare random single-qubit pure states), and a quantum polynomial-time prover. Here, soundness is unconditional-i. e., it holds even for computationally unbounded provers. Compared to prior work achieving similar results, our technique does not require the encoding of the input or of the computation; instead, we rely on encryption of the input (together with a method to perform computations on encrypted inputs), and show that the random choice between three types of input (defining a computational run, versus two types of test runs) suffices. Because the overhead is very low for each run (it is linear in the size of the circuit), this shows that verification could be achieved at minimal cost compared to performing the computation. As a proof technique, we use a reduction to an entanglement-based protocol; to the best of our knowledge, this is the first time this technique has been used in the context of verification of quantum computations, and it enables a relatively straightforward analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:37
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Consciousness and brain: how "to verify the harmony with algebra"
    Ivanitsky, Alexey
    VOPROSY FILOSOFII, 2015, (02) : 38 - 44
  • [22] How to verify dynamic properties of information systems
    Evans, N
    Treharne, H
    Laleau, R
    Frappier, M
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND FORMAL METHODS, 2004, : 416 - 425
  • [23] HOW STUDENTS VERIFY CONJECTURES: TEACHERS' EXPECTATIONS
    Bergqvist, Tomas
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS TEACHER EDUCATION, 2005, 8 (02) : 171 - 191
  • [24] HOW MANY CHECK POINTS VERIFY A FORMULA
    STANECKI, JW
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1972, 79 (24) : 138 - &
  • [25] Quantum computation
    Hughes, R
    COMPUTING IN SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2001, 3 (02) : 26 - 26
  • [26] QUANTUM COMPUTATION
    DIVINCENZO, DP
    SCIENCE, 1995, 270 (5234) : 255 - 261
  • [27] Quantum computation
    Gudder, S
    AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL MONTHLY, 2003, 110 (03): : 181 - 201
  • [28] Quantum computation
    Grover, LK
    TWELFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON VLSI DESIGN, PROCEEDINGS, 1999, : 548 - 553
  • [29] Quantum computation
    Yamamoto, Y
    Yamaguchi, F
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE PHYSICS OF SEMICONDUCTORS, PTS I AND II, 2001, 87 : 20 - 23
  • [30] Quantum computation
    Deutsch, D
    Ekert, A
    PHYSICS WORLD, 1998, 11 (03) : 47 - 52