Human breast cancer cells contain an error-prone DNA replication apparatus

被引:0
|
作者
Sekowski, JW
Malkas, LH
Schnaper, L
Bechtel, PE
Long, BJ
Hickey, RJ
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Pharmacol & Expt Therapeut, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Greenebaum Canc Ctr, Program Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Program Mol & Cellular Biol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[4] Univ Maryland, Toxicol Program, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[5] Greater Baltimore Med Ctr, Comprehens Breast Care Ctr, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The mechanisms responsible for creating genetic errors and genomic instability in cancer cells have not been fully defined. Recently, it has been shown that human cells contain a highly organized complex of proteins, termed the DNA synthesome, that is fully competent to carry out all phases of SV40 in vitro DNA replication (J, M. Coll el al., Oncol. Res., 8: 435-447, 1996; L. H. Malkas et al., Biochemistry, 29: 6362-6374, 1990; Y. Wu et at, J, Cell, Biochem,, 54: 32-46, 1994; N. Applegren et al., J, Cell. Biochem,, 54: 32-46, 1994), DNA replication fidelity analyses of the DNA synthesome derived from malignant and nonmalignant human breast cells demonstrate that the malignant cell synthesome is mutagenic. The decrease in tumor cell replication fidelity was not due to an increased proliferative capacity of the tumor cells or an increase in the synthetic activity of their DNA synthesome. The ratios of insertions, deletions, and mismatches created by the synthesome from malignant and nonmalignant breast cells were essentially identical, despite the greater overall number of mutations made by the breast cancer cell synthesome. These data define, for the first time, a mechanism unique to cancer cells that contributes to the observed increase in genetic mutation in cancer cells.
引用
收藏
页码:3259 / 3263
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Adaptive use of error-prone DNA polymerases provides flexibility in genome replication during tumorigenesis
    Bainbridge, Lewis J.
    Daigaku, Yasukazu
    CANCER SCIENCE, 2024, 115 (07) : 2125 - 2137
  • [32] Error-prone translesion replication of damaged DNA suppresses skin carcinogenesis by controlling inflammatory hyperplasia
    Tsaalbi-Shtylik, Anastasia
    Verspuy, Johan W. A.
    Jansen, Jacob G.
    Rebel, Heggert
    Carlee, Leone M.
    van der Valk, Martin A.
    Jonkers, Jos
    de Gruijl, Frank R.
    de Wind, Niels
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (51) : 21836 - 21841
  • [33] Structural basis of error-prone DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase θ
    Li, Chuxuan
    Maksoud, Leora M.
    Gao, Yang
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2025, 16 (01)
  • [34] Directed Evolution of an Error-Prone T7 DNA Polymerase that Attenuates Viral Replication
    Soete, Sandra
    Kleine, Stefan
    Schlicke, Marina
    Brakmann, Susanne
    CHEMBIOCHEM, 2011, 12 (10) : 1551 - 1558
  • [35] JOINING OF LINEAR PLASMID DNA IS REDUCED AND ERROR-PRONE IN BLOOMS SYNDROME CELLS
    RUNGER, TM
    KRAEMER, KH
    EMBO JOURNAL, 1989, 8 (05): : 1419 - 1425
  • [36] An Error-Prone Polymerase in the Fight against Cancer
    Achar, Yathish Jagadheesh
    Foiani, Marco
    CELL, 2019, 176 (06) : 1241 - 1243
  • [37] Error-prone repair DNA polymerases in prokaryotes and eukaryotes
    Goodman, MF
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOCHEMISTRY, 2002, 71 : 17 - 50
  • [38] INDUCIBILITY OF ERROR-PRONE DNA-REPAIR IN YEAST
    SIEDE, W
    ECKARDT, F
    MUTATION RESEARCH, 1984, 129 (01): : 3 - 11
  • [39] Xeroderma pigmentosum variant and error-prone DNA polymerases
    Kannouche, P
    Stary, A
    BIOCHIMIE, 2003, 85 (11) : 1123 - 1132
  • [40] Error-free and error-prone DNA repair gene expression data through reprogramming and passage in human iPS cells
    Yoshimura, Yasuhide
    Okuzaki, Daisuke
    DATA IN BRIEF, 2020, 29