Human breast cancer cells contain an error-prone DNA replication apparatus

被引:0
|
作者
Sekowski, JW
Malkas, LH
Schnaper, L
Bechtel, PE
Long, BJ
Hickey, RJ
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Pharmacol & Expt Therapeut, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Greenebaum Canc Ctr, Program Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Program Mol & Cellular Biol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[4] Univ Maryland, Toxicol Program, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[5] Greater Baltimore Med Ctr, Comprehens Breast Care Ctr, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The mechanisms responsible for creating genetic errors and genomic instability in cancer cells have not been fully defined. Recently, it has been shown that human cells contain a highly organized complex of proteins, termed the DNA synthesome, that is fully competent to carry out all phases of SV40 in vitro DNA replication (J, M. Coll el al., Oncol. Res., 8: 435-447, 1996; L. H. Malkas et al., Biochemistry, 29: 6362-6374, 1990; Y. Wu et at, J, Cell, Biochem,, 54: 32-46, 1994; N. Applegren et al., J, Cell. Biochem,, 54: 32-46, 1994), DNA replication fidelity analyses of the DNA synthesome derived from malignant and nonmalignant human breast cells demonstrate that the malignant cell synthesome is mutagenic. The decrease in tumor cell replication fidelity was not due to an increased proliferative capacity of the tumor cells or an increase in the synthetic activity of their DNA synthesome. The ratios of insertions, deletions, and mismatches created by the synthesome from malignant and nonmalignant breast cells were essentially identical, despite the greater overall number of mutations made by the breast cancer cell synthesome. These data define, for the first time, a mechanism unique to cancer cells that contributes to the observed increase in genetic mutation in cancer cells.
引用
收藏
页码:3259 / 3263
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Structural basis of error-prone replication and stalling at a thymine base by human DNA polymerase ι
    Kirouac, Kevin N.
    Ling, Hong
    EMBO JOURNAL, 2009, 28 (11): : 1644 - 1654
  • [2] Error-prone replication for better or worse
    Tippin, B
    Pham, P
    Goodman, MF
    TRENDS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 12 (06) : 288 - 295
  • [3] Polι, a remarkably error-prone human DNA polymerase
    Tissier, A
    McDonald, JP
    Frank, EG
    Woodgate, R
    GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 2000, 14 (13) : 1642 - 1650
  • [4] Error-prone DNA repair and translesion synthesis: Focus on the replication fork
    Bridges, BA
    DNA REPAIR, 2005, 4 (05) : 618 - 619
  • [5] Error-prone lesion bypass by human DNA polymerase η
    Zhang, YB
    Yuan, FH
    Wu, XH
    Rechkoblit, O
    Taylor, JS
    Geacintov, NE
    Wang, ZG
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (23) : 4717 - 4724
  • [6] ERROR-PRONE DNA-REPAIR AND REPLICATION IN RELATION TO MALIGNANT TRANSFORMATION
    TROSKO, JE
    CHANG, CC
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1984, 16 (02) : 363 - 365
  • [7] Molecular insights into error-prone DNA replication and error-free lesion bypass
    Marx, A
    Summerer, D
    CHEMBIOCHEM, 2002, 3 (05) : 405 - 407
  • [8] Cancer cells activate damage-tolerant and error-prone DNA synthesis
    Mutter-Rottmayer, Elizabeth
    Gao, Yanzhe
    Vaziri, Cyrus
    MOLECULAR & CELLULAR ONCOLOGY, 2016, 3 (06):
  • [9] Error-prone replication of a 5-formylcytosine-mediated DNA-peptide cross-link in human cells
    Naldiga, Spandana
    Ji, Shaofei
    Thomforde, Jenna
    Nicolae, Claudia M.
    Lee, Marietta
    Zhang, Zhongtao
    Moldovan, George-Lucian
    Tretyakova, Natalia Y.
    Basu, Ashis K.
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2019, 294 (27) : 10619 - 10627
  • [10] Error-prone replication of oxidatively damaged DNA by a high-fidelity DNA polymerase
    Gerald W. Hsu
    Matthias Ober
    Thomas Carell
    Lorena S. Beese
    Nature, 2004, 431 : 217 - 221