Cognitive biases and decision-making strategies in times of change: a systematic literature review

被引:71
|
作者
Acciarini, Chiara [1 ]
Brunetta, Federica [2 ]
Boccardelli, Paolo [2 ]
机构
[1] Luiss Univ, Dept Business & Management, Rome, Italy
[2] Luiss Business Sch, Rome, Italy
关键词
Cognitive; Bias; Decision-; making; Process; Transformation; BIG DATA; MANAGEMENT; DIVERSITY; INFORMATION; ORGANIZATIONS; ENTREPRENEURS; INNOVATION; INTUITION; CONFLICT; PARADOX;
D O I
10.1108/MD-07-2019-1006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose In a work environment marked by unprecedented complexity, volatility and ambiguity, managers must accomplish their objectives while navigating many challenges. This paper aims to investigate potential interrelations among environmental transformations, cognitive biases and strategic decisions. In particular, the purpose of the study is to crystallize the state of art on the impact of cognitive biases on strategic decisions, in the context of environmental transformations. Design/methodology/approach The authors have conducted a systematic literature review to identify existing relevant work on this topic and to detect potential avenues for future research. Findings The findings highlight how decision-making is influenced and enabled by internal (e.g. perception) and external factors (e.g. digitalization). Specifically, the strategic role of cognitive biases appears to be crucial when investigating the related impact on strategic decisions in times of environmental transformation. Practical implications Implications are drawn for scholars and practitioners interested in evaluating the role of specific decision-making determinants for the formation and implementation of strategic decisions. In this sense, we stress that decision-makers need to manage their cognitive biases and select the right information out of a wide data set in order to adapt to environmental transformations. Originality/value By systematizing the literature review, potential interrelations among environmental transformations, cognitive biases and strategic decisions are identified. Furthermore, the primary phases that drive the decision-making process are proposed (analysis, decision, onboarding and control).
引用
收藏
页码:638 / 652
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Measuring behavioral biases in individual investors decision-making and sociodemographic correlations: a systematic review
    Cardoso, Nicolas de Oliveira
    Salvador, Eduarda Zorgi
    Broch, Gustavo
    Mette, Frederike Monika Budiner
    Yoshinaga, Claudia Emiko
    Machado, Wagner de Lara
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN FINANCIAL MARKETS, 2024, 16 (04) : 636 - 659
  • [33] Computational Method for Corrective Mechanism of Cognitive Decision-Making Biases
    Foeldesi, Peter
    Botzheim, Janos
    [J]. 3RD IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE INFOCOMMUNICATIONS (COGINFOCOM 2012), 2012, : 211 - 215
  • [34] Interventions to Mitigate Cognitive Biases in the Decision Making of Eye Care Professionals: A Systematic Review
    Shlonsky, Aron
    Featherston, Rebecca
    Galvin, Karyn L.
    Vogel, Adam P.
    Granger, Catherine L.
    Lewis, Courtney
    Luong, My-Linh
    Downie, Laura E.
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2019, 96 (11) : 818 - 824
  • [35] Exploring cognitive biases and psychological influences in legal decision-making
    Wei, Weiyan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2023, 32 : 119 - 119
  • [36] THE INSANITY PLEA - COGNITIVE AND MOTIVATIONAL BIASES IN JURY DECISION-MAKING
    ROWE, K
    BAINS, GS
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1982, 35 (DEC): : A101 - A101
  • [37] STRATEGIES AND BIASES IN HUMAN DECISION-MAKING AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR EXPERT SYSTEMS
    JACOB, VS
    GAULTNEY, LD
    SALVENDY, G
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 1986, 5 (02) : 119 - 140
  • [38] Refugee agency in secondary mobility decision-making: a systematic literature review
    Kavak, Sinem
    Hamza, Mo
    Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas
    Stone, Russell A.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN DYNAMICS, 2024, 6
  • [39] Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in oncology: a systematic review of the literature
    Covvey, Jordan R.
    Kamal, Khalid M.
    Gorse, Erin E.
    Mehta, Zumi
    Dhumal, Trupti
    Heidari, Elham
    Rao, Deepika
    Zacker, Christopher
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2019, 27 (05) : 1613 - 1637
  • [40] Fairness perceptions of algorithmic decision-making: A systematic review of the empirical literature
    Starke, Christopher
    Baleis, Janine
    Keller, Birte
    Marcinkowski, Frank
    [J]. BIG DATA & SOCIETY, 2022, 9 (02):