Primary temporal bone squamous cell carcinoma: Comparing the prognostic value of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification (8th edition) with the revised Pittsburgh staging system

被引:5
|
作者
Zanoletti, Elisabetta [1 ]
Franz, Leonardo [1 ,2 ]
Favaretto, Niccolo [1 ]
Cazzador, Diego [1 ,3 ]
Franchella, Sebastiano [1 ,4 ]
Calvanese, Leonardo [1 ]
Nicolai, Piero [1 ]
Mazzoni, Antonio [1 ]
Marioni, Gino [1 ]
机构
[1] Padova Univ, Dept Neurosci DNS, Sect Otolaryngol, Via Giustiniani 2, I-35128 Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Padova Univ, Dept Neurosci DNS, Sect Human Anat, Padua, Italy
[4] Univ Padua, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Padua, Italy
关键词
AJCC TNM 8th edition; prognosis; revised Pittsburgh staging system; squamous cell carcinoma; temporal bone; EXTERNAL AUDITORY MEATUS; MANAGEMENT; PROPOSAL; EAR;
D O I
10.1002/hed.26980
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background Retrospectively considering a temporal bone squamous cell carcinomas (TBSCCs) series, our aim was to compare the predictive power of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system (8th edition) with the revised Pittsburgh staging system (rPSS) in terms of disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS). Methods Forty-three TBSCCs consecutively treated surgically were reviewed. The prognostic performance of AJCC and rPSS was compared. Results The areas under the curves for the prediction of DFS, DSS, and OS did not differ significantly between both staging systems (p = 0.518, p = 0.940, and p = 0.910, respectively). Harrel's C-indexes for respectively the AJCC and rPSS were 0.76 and 0.70 for DFS, 0.73 and 0.76 for DSS, 0.66 and 0.63 for OS. Conclusion Comparable prognostic accuracy was observed between AJCC and rPSS. Levels of prognostic performance were only acceptable for both systems, according to Hosmer-Lemeshow scale. Further efforts are needed to define new TBSCC staging modalities with higher prognostic reliability.
引用
收藏
页码:889 / 896
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of the University of Pittsburgh staging system and the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification for the prognostic evaluation of external auditory canal cancer
    Shinya Morita
    Takatsugu Mizumachi
    Yuji Nakamaru
    Tomohiro Sakashita
    Satoshi Kano
    Kimiko Hoshino
    Atsushi Fukuda
    Keishi Fujiwara
    Akihiro Homma
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2018, 23 : 1029 - 1037
  • [22] Comparison of the University of Pittsburgh staging system and the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification for the prognostic evaluation of external auditory canal cancer
    Morita, Shinya
    Mizumachi, Takatsugu
    Nakamaru, Yuji
    Sakashita, Tomohiro
    Kano, Satoshi
    Hoshino, Kimiko
    Fukuda, Atsushi
    Fujiwara, Keishi
    Homma, Akihiro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 23 (06) : 1029 - 1037
  • [23] Validation of the 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for tongue squamous cell carcinoma
    Satoshi Kano
    Tomohiro Sakashita
    Nayuta Tsushima
    Takatsugu Mizumachi
    Akira Nakazono
    Takayoshi Suzuki
    Shinichiro Yasukawa
    Akihiro Homma
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2018, 23 : 844 - 850
  • [24] Benefits of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer System for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Staging
    Catalin Bogdan Satala
    Ioan Jung
    Laszlo Kobori
    Zsolt Kovacs
    Decebal Fodor
    Rita Szodorai
    Simona Gurzu
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer, 2021, 52 : 243 - 248
  • [25] Validation of the 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for tongue squamous cell carcinoma
    Kano, Satoshi
    Sakashita, Tomohiro
    Tsushima, Nayuta
    Mizumachi, Takatsugu
    Nakazono, Akira
    Suzuki, Takayoshi
    Yasukawa, Shinichiro
    Homma, Akihiro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 23 (05) : 844 - 850
  • [26] Benefits of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer System for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Staging
    Satala, Catalin Bogdan
    Jung, Ioan
    Kobori, Laszlo
    Kovacs, Zsolt
    Fodor, Decebal
    Szodorai, Rita
    Gurzu, Simona
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER, 2021, 52 (01) : 243 - 248
  • [27] Performance of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual, 8th Edition vs the Brigham and Women's Hospital Tumor Classification System for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Ruiz, Emily Stamell
    Karia, Pritesh S.
    Besaw, Robert
    Schmults, Chrysalyne D.
    JAMA DERMATOLOGY, 2019, 155 (07) : 819 - 825
  • [28] Embracing changes to the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition melanoma staging system
    Haydu, Lauren E.
    Thompson, John F.
    Scolyer, Richard A.
    Gershenwald, Jeffrey E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 112 : 9 - 11
  • [29] Modification of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for gallbladder carcinoma to improve prognostic precision
    Wei Jiang
    Bingqing Zhao
    Yongcheng Li
    Dunfeng Qi
    Daxing Wang
    BMC Cancer, 20
  • [30] Modification of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for gallbladder carcinoma to improve prognostic precision
    Jiang, Wei
    Zhao, Bingqing
    Li, Yongcheng
    Qi, Dunfeng
    Wang, Daxing
    BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)