The effects of selective logging on forest structure and tree species composition in a Central African forest: implications for management of conservation areas

The forests of Central Africa enjoy world-wide recognition for their spectacular wildlife and also harbor an abundance of high quality timber. With mismanagement and the conversion of large tracts of West African forest to agricultural production, Central African forests are experiencing increased harvesting pressures. This is particularly true for species of African mahogany (Entandrophragma spp.). In the tri-national region of Cameroon, Central African Republic, and Republic of Congo, a widely applied version of the Integrated Conservation and Development Model attributes the dual management objectives of biodiversity conservation and timber production to the same zones. Many conservationists working in the region believe that highly selective timber extraction is the best management scenario to meet these objectives. Conventional wisdom holds that if selective logging does not adequately regenerate Entandrophragma spp., loggers will quit the region after having mined the forest. A comparison between unlogged, 6-month and 18-year post-harvest forest stands indicates lasting effects of highly selective, high grade logging. While there was little difference in tree species composition and diversity between treatments, stem densities of both saplings and trees in unlogged forest were significantly higher than those in forest sampled 18 years after logging. Evidence suggests inadequate recruitment of Entandrophragma cylindricum and E. utile, the principal timber species, to justify continued timber extraction. Data indicate a significant shift in canopy dominance from shade intolerant to shade beating species due to insufficient canopy disturbance. Nevertheless, an abundance of other top quality timber species remains after selective removal of African mahogany and these forests will remain attractive to loggers long after the elimination of Entandrophragma spp. A better approach to manage timber zones for timber production and conservation would be an adaptive management approach based on increased species selection and canopy disturbance. Zones targeting the conservation of closed forest obligate species should not be logged. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.