Space mission architecture trade off based on stakeholder value

被引:1
|
作者
Alves Branco, Marcio Silva [1 ]
Loureiro, Geilson [2 ]
Trabasso, Luis Gonzaga [3 ]
机构
[1] INPE, Natl Inst Space Res, Av dos Astronautas 1758, BR-12227010 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] INPA, Lab Integrat & Testing, Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
[3] ITA, Aeronaut Inst Technol, Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
关键词
space mission architecture; trade off; value; stakeholders; decision;
D O I
10.1007/978-1-84628-976-7_11
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
One the most difficult aspects of system conceptualization process is to recognize, understand and manage the trade-offs in a way that maximizes the success of the product. This is particularly important for space projects. In this way, a major part of the system engineer's role is to provide information that the system manager can use to make the right decisions. This includes identification of alternative architectures and characterization of those elements in a way that helps managers to find out, among the alternatives, a design that provides a better combination of the various technical areas involved in the design. Space mission architecture consists of a broad system concept which is the most fundamental statement of how the mission will be carried out and satisfy the stakeholders. The architecture development process starts with the stakeholder analysis which enables the identification of the decision drivers, then, the requirements are analysed for elaborationg the system concept. Effectiveness parameters such as performance, cost, risk and schedule are the outcomes of the stakeholder analysis which are labelled as decision drivers to be used in a trade off process to improve the managerial mission decisions. Thus, the proposal presented herein provides a means for innovating the mission design process by identifying drivers through stakeholder analysis and use them in a trade off process to obtain the stakeholder satisfaction with effectiveness parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Impact of Stakeholder Identities on Value Creation in Issue-Based Stakeholder Networks
    Schneider, Thomas
    Sachs, Sybille
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2017, 144 (01) : 41 - 57
  • [42] The Impact of Stakeholder Identities on Value Creation in Issue-Based Stakeholder Networks
    Thomas Schneider
    Sybille Sachs
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2017, 144 : 41 - 57
  • [43] THE VALUE-BASED MANAGEMENT APPROACH: FROM THE SHAREHOLDER VALUE TO THE STAKEHOLDER VALUE
    Munteanu, Valentin
    Danaiata, Doina
    Hurbean, Luminita
    Bergler, Alice
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: APPROACHES IN ORGANISATIONAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, : 39 - 44
  • [44] Flash-based FPGAs in Space, design guidelines and trade-off for critical applications
    Urbina-Ortega, C.
    Furano, G.
    Magistrati, G.
    Marinis, K.
    Menicucci, A.
    Merodio-Codinachs, D.
    [J]. 2013 14TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON RADIATION AND ITS EFFECTS ON COMPONENTS AND SYSTEMS (RADECS), 2013,
  • [45] A Survey on Architecture Research of Novel Non-Volatile Memory Based on Dynamical Trade-Off
    Zhang, Mingzhe
    Zhang, Fa
    Liu, Zhiyong
    [J]. Jisuanji Yanjiu yu Fazhan/Computer Research and Development, 2019, 56 (04): : 677 - 691
  • [46] Stakeholder value network analysis of prefabricated buildings based on value flow
    Li, Ming
    Xu, Xia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 23 (01) : 75 - 85
  • [47] Guided architecture trade space exploration: fusing model-based engineering and design by shopping
    Sam Procter
    Lutz Wrage
    [J]. Software and Systems Modeling, 2021, 20 : 2023 - 2045
  • [48] Use of model-based architecture attributes to construct a component-level trade space
    McKean, David
    Moreland, James D., Jr.
    Doskey, Steven
    [J]. SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2019, 22 (02) : 172 - 187
  • [49] MissionML: A Mission Architecture Modeling Language based on Unified Architecture Framework
    Yang, Yilong
    Song, Wenxiao
    Chang, Chuangye
    Gao, Xinghai
    [J]. INCOSE International Symposium, 2024, 34 (01) : 479 - 502
  • [50] ! Trade off Cybersecurity Concerns for Co-Created Value
    Hu, Tao
    Wang, Kai-Yu
    Chih, Wenhai
    Yang, Xiu-Hua
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2020, 60 (05) : 468 - 483