Space mission architecture trade off based on stakeholder value

被引:1
|
作者
Alves Branco, Marcio Silva [1 ]
Loureiro, Geilson [2 ]
Trabasso, Luis Gonzaga [3 ]
机构
[1] INPE, Natl Inst Space Res, Av dos Astronautas 1758, BR-12227010 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] INPA, Lab Integrat & Testing, Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
[3] ITA, Aeronaut Inst Technol, Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
关键词
space mission architecture; trade off; value; stakeholders; decision;
D O I
10.1007/978-1-84628-976-7_11
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
One the most difficult aspects of system conceptualization process is to recognize, understand and manage the trade-offs in a way that maximizes the success of the product. This is particularly important for space projects. In this way, a major part of the system engineer's role is to provide information that the system manager can use to make the right decisions. This includes identification of alternative architectures and characterization of those elements in a way that helps managers to find out, among the alternatives, a design that provides a better combination of the various technical areas involved in the design. Space mission architecture consists of a broad system concept which is the most fundamental statement of how the mission will be carried out and satisfy the stakeholders. The architecture development process starts with the stakeholder analysis which enables the identification of the decision drivers, then, the requirements are analysed for elaborationg the system concept. Effectiveness parameters such as performance, cost, risk and schedule are the outcomes of the stakeholder analysis which are labelled as decision drivers to be used in a trade off process to improve the managerial mission decisions. Thus, the proposal presented herein provides a means for innovating the mission design process by identifying drivers through stakeholder analysis and use them in a trade off process to obtain the stakeholder satisfaction with effectiveness parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stakeholder's Expected Value of Enterprise Architecture An Enterprise Architecture Solution based on Stakeholder Perspective
    Puspitasari, Ira
    [J]. 2016 IEEE/ACIS 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING RESEARCH, MANAGEMENT AND APPLICATIONS (SERA), 2016, : 243 - 248
  • [2] Risk-adjusted mission value: Trading off mission risk for mission value
    Miles, RF
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2004, 24 (02) : 415 - 424
  • [3] Goals for space exploration based on stakeholder value network considerations
    Cameron, Bruce G.
    Seher, Theodore
    Crawley, Edward F.
    [J]. ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2011, 68 (11-12) : 2088 - 2097
  • [4] Stakeholder value driven threat modeling for off the shelf based systems
    Chen, Yue
    Boehm, Barry W.
    [J]. 29TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING: ICSE 2007 COMPANION VOLUME, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 91 - +
  • [5] Rapid Mission Architecture Trade Study of Enceladus Mission Concepts
    Adler, Mark
    Moeller, Robert C.
    Borden, Chester S.
    Smythe, William D.
    Shotwell, Robert F.
    Cole, Bjorn F.
    Spilker, Thomas R.
    Strange, Nathan J.
    Petropoulos, Anastassios E.
    Chattopadhyay, Debarati
    Ervin, Joan
    Deems, Elizabeth
    Tsou, Peter
    Spencer, John
    [J]. 2011 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, 2011,
  • [6] Architecture Design of Joint Mission Space Model Based on BOM
    Zhou, Yun
    Zhao, Xinye
    Yang, Shanliang
    Huang, Kedi
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHATRONIC SCIENCES, ELECTRIC ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER (MEC), 2013, : 3795 - 3799
  • [7] MAXIMIZING THE VALUE OF A SPACE MISSION
    HALL, NG
    MAGAZINE, MJ
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1994, 78 (02) : 224 - 241
  • [8] DARWIN mission and configuration trade-off
    Wallner, Oswald
    Ergenzinger, Klaus
    Flatscher, Reinhold
    Johann, Ulrich
    [J]. ADVANCES IN STELLAR INTERFEROMETRY PTS 1 AND 2, 2006, 6268
  • [9] Guidance trade-off for aerocapture mission
    Vernis, P
    Gelly, G
    Ferreira, E
    Da Costa, R
    Ortega, G
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SPACE FLIGHT DYNAMICS, 2004, 548 : 365 - 372
  • [10] VALUE TRADE-OFF
    HADARI, SA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 1988, 50 (03): : 655 - 676