Evaluation of various boosting ensemble algorithms for predicting flood hazard susceptibility areas

被引:0
|
作者
Quoc Bao Pham [1 ]
Pal, Subodh Chandra [2 ]
Chakrabortty, Rabin [2 ]
Norouzi, Akbar [3 ,4 ]
Golshan, Mohammad [5 ]
Ogunrinde, Akinwale T. [6 ]
Janizadeh, Saeid [7 ]
Khedher, Khaled Mohamed [8 ,9 ]
Duong Tran Anh [10 ]
机构
[1] Thu Dau Mot Univ, Inst Appl Technol, Thu Dau Mot City, Vietnam
[2] Univ Burdwan, Dept Geog, Bardhaman, W Bengal, India
[3] Shahrekord Univ, Fac Nat Resources & Earth Sci, Dept Nat Engn, Shahrekord, Iran
[4] East Azarbaijan Reg Water Co, Expert Water Resource Khoda Afarin Cty, Tabriz, Iran
[5] Nat Resources & Watershed Management Off, Astara, Guilan, Iran
[6] Fed Univ Technol Akure, Dept Agr & Environm Engn, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria
[7] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Nat Resources & Marine Sci, Dept Watershed Management Engn & Sci, Tehran, Iran
[8] King Khalid Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Abha, Saudi Arabia
[9] High Inst Technol Studies, Dept Civil Engn, Mrezgua Univ Campus, Nabeul, Tunisia
[10] Ho Chi Minh City Univ Technol HUTECH, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
关键词
Boosting ensemble model; deep boosting (DB); flood hazard; deep decision tree; Talar watershed; MODELS;
D O I
10.1080/19475705.2021.1968510
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The purpose of the present study was to predict the areas affected by flood hazard in the Talar watershed, Mazandaran province, Iran, using Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Boosted Generalized Linear Models (BGLM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) ensemble models, and the novel ensemble framework of deep decision trees include the Deep Boosting (DB) model. For this purpose, 14 flood conditioning variables were used as independent variables in flood hazard modeling. In addition, 130 flood points in the region were identified by field visits and available flood information, which were used as the dependent variable in modeling. The results showed that all used models have a good efficiency in predicting flood hazard. The area under curve (AUC) of BGLM, XGB, AdaBoost and DB models were 0.88, 0.87, 0.89 and 0.91, respectively, which indicated the highest efficiency of the DB model in flood hazard modeling in the study area. Relative importance of the variables showed that they have different effects in each model. Altitude and distance from the river are more important than other variables. However, these two variables have been selected as the most important variables based on machine learning models, but other variables may be influential in flood hazards.
引用
收藏
页码:2607 / 2628
页数:22
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [21] A hybrid of ensemble machine learning models with RFE and Boruta wrapper-based algorithms for flash flood susceptibility assessment
    Habibi, Alireza
    Delavar, Mahmoud Reza
    Sadeghian, Mohammad Sadegh
    Nazari, Borzoo
    Pirasteh, Saeid
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2023, 122
  • [22] Predictive Performances of Ensemble Machine Learning Algorithms in Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Natural Gradient Boosting (NGBoost)
    Kavzoglu, Taskin
    Teke, Alihan
    [J]. ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 47 (06) : 7367 - 7385
  • [23] Predictive Performances of Ensemble Machine Learning Algorithms in Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Natural Gradient Boosting (NGBoost)
    Taskin Kavzoglu
    Alihan Teke
    [J]. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2022, 47 : 7367 - 7385
  • [24] Flash Flood Susceptibility Modeling Using New Approaches of Hybrid and Ensemble Tree-Based Machine Learning Algorithms
    Band, Shahab S.
    Janizadeh, Saeid
    Pal, Subodh Chandra
    Saha, Asish
    Chakrabortty, Rabin
    Melesse, Assefa M.
    Mosavi, Amirhosein
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (21) : 1 - 23
  • [25] Flood susceptibility modeling in the urban watershed of Guwahati using improved metaheuristic-based ensemble machine learning algorithms
    Ahmed, Ishita Afreen
    Talukdar, Swapan
    Shahfahad
    Parvez, Ayesha
    Rihan, Mohd
    Baig, Mirza Razi Imam
    Rahman, Atiqur
    [J]. GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (26) : 12238 - 12266
  • [26] Evaluation of different boosting ensemble machine learning models and novel deep learning and boosting framework for head-cut gully erosion susceptibility
    Chen, Wei
    Lei, Xinxiang
    Chakrabortty, Rabin
    Pal, Subodh Chandra
    Sahana, Mehebub
    Janizadeh, Saeid
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 284
  • [27] Evaluation of bivariate statistical and hybrid models for the preparation of flood hazard susceptibility maps in the Brahmani River Basin, India
    Anand, Aditya Kumar
    Pradhan, Sarada Prasad
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2023, 82 (16)
  • [28] Evaluation of bivariate statistical and hybrid models for the preparation of flood hazard susceptibility maps in the Brahmani River Basin, India
    Aditya Kumar Anand
    Sarada Prasad Pradhan
    [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2023, 82
  • [29] Predicting flood hazard areas: A SWAT and HEC-RAS simulations conducted in aguan river basin of honduras, central America
    Rivera, Samuel
    Hernandez, Alexander J.
    Douglas Ramsey, R.
    Suarez, Gines
    Rodriguez, San Alonso
    [J]. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing - ASPRS Annual Conference 2007: Identifying Geospatial Solutions, 2007, 2 : 594 - 603
  • [30] Gully erosion susceptibility assessment and management of hazard-prone areas in India using different machine learning algorithms
    Gayen, Amiya
    Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza
    Saha, Sunil
    Keesstra, Saskia
    Bai, Shibiao
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 668 : 124 - 138