Infants' prenatal exposure to opioids and the association with birth outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:16
|
作者
Graeve, Richard [1 ]
Balalian, Arin A. [2 ]
Richter, Matthias [3 ]
Kielstein, Heike [4 ]
Fink, Astrid [3 ]
Martins, Silvia S. [2 ]
Philbin, Morgan M. [5 ]
Factor-Litvak, Pam [2 ]
机构
[1] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Med Fac, Halle, Saale, Germany
[2] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Med Fac, Interdisciplinary Ctr Hlth Sci, Inst Med Sociol IMS, Halle, Saale, Germany
[4] MLU Halle Wittenberg, Inst Fuer Anat & Zellbiol, Halle, Saale, Germany
[5] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Sociomed Sci, New York, NY USA
关键词
birth outcomes; birthweight; foetal growth; perinatal death; prenatal opioid exposure; preterm birth; 5-MINUTE APGAR SCORE; PRETERM BIRTH; NARCOTIC ADDICTION; BRAIN SIZE; PREGNANCY; CHILDREN; METHADONE; RISK; AGE; HOSPITALIZATION;
D O I
10.1111/ppe.12805
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Prenatal exposure to opioids (PEO) is a worldwide public health issue. Opioids cross the placental barrier and may affect the developing foetus and the birth outcomes. Objectives This review aimed to explore newborns' weight, length and head circumference, preterm birth, and perinatal death as primary outcomes in relation to PEO. The secondary outcomes were gestational age at birth, Apgar scores and length of hospitalisation after delivery. Data sources PubMed, Embase, PsycInfo and the Web of Science. Study selection and data extraction Inclusion criteria were (i) cohort, case-control or cross-sectional peer-reviewed studies published in English through 1 March 2021; (ii) comparing outcomes between prenatal exposed and unexposed groups to opioids (prescribed or obtained illegally). Exclusion criteria were foetal alcohol syndrome and non-opioid primary exposure. Synthesis Data were extracted by two authors. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used for study quality assessment. Due to heterogeneity across studies, we used random effects models to obtain pooled standardised mean difference (SMD), pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Data from 80 studies were extracted. In meta-analyses, opioid-exposed neonates had lower birthweight (SMD -0.77, 95% CI -0.90, -0.64, I-2 = 82%), smaller head circumference (SMD -0.67, 95% CI -0.86, -0.48, I-2 = 84%), shorter birth length (SMD -0.97, 95% CI -1.24, -0.70, I-2 = 91%) and gestational age (SMD -0.45, 95% CI -0.60, -0.30, I-2 = 80%) than unexposed neonates. Pooled risks of neonatal death and preterm birth were higher among opioid-exposed compared to unexposed neonates (RR 4.05, 95% CI 2.12, 7.72, I-2 = 73%; and RR 1.92, 95% CI 1.57, 2.35, I-2 = 99%). Conclusions We found increased risks of adverse birth outcomes in relation to PEO. Caution should be used in interpreting the findings, as many studies were rated as poor quality, and with substantial inter-study heterogeneity. Future studies should ensure comparability of opioid-exposed and -unexposed group to strengthen internal validity.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:125 / 143
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of prenatal triclosan exposure on gestational age and anthropometric measures at birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Khoshhali, Mehri
    Amin, Mohammad Mehdi
    Fatehizadeh, Ali
    Ebrahimi, Afshin
    Taheri, Ensiyeh
    Kelishadi, Roya
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 25
  • [32] Neonatal outcomes with water birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Vanderlaan, Jennifer
    Hall, Priscilla J.
    Lewitt, MaryJane
    MIDWIFERY, 2018, 59 : 27 - 38
  • [33] Trichomoniasis and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Van Gerwen, O. T.
    Craig-Kuhn, M. C.
    Jones, A. T.
    Schroeder, J. A.
    Deaver, J.
    Buekens, P.
    Kissinger, P. J.
    Muzny, C. A.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 128 (12) : 1907 - 1915
  • [34] The intergenerational association of preterm birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Seid, Abdulbasit
    Cumpston, Miranda S.
    Ahmed, Kedir Y.
    Bizuayehu, Habtamu Mellie
    Thapa, Subash
    Tegegne, Teketo Kassaw
    Dadi, Abel F.
    Odo, Daniel Bogale
    Shifti, Desalegn Markos
    Belachew, Sewunet Admasu
    Kibret, Getiye Dejenu
    Ketema, Daniel Bekele
    Kassa, Zemenu Yohannes
    Amsalu, Erkihun
    Bore, Meless G.
    Hassen, Tahir Ahmed
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2024,
  • [35] The association between maternal prenatal hair cortisol concentration and preterm birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kunzel, Richard G.
    Elgazzar, Merna
    Bain, Paul A.
    Kirschbaum, Clemens
    Papatheodorou, Stefania
    Gelaye, Bizu
    PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2024, 165
  • [36] Ambient ozone exposure and pregnancy complications and adverse birth outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhao, Yuanfang
    Qu, Yanhong
    Huang, Xin
    Wu, Fan
    Sun, Siyuan
    Qin, Rongrong
    Yu, Zengli
    Zhang, Huanhuan
    Wang, Qiong
    Huang, Cunrui
    Environmental Research, 270
  • [37] Prenatal exposure to bisphenol A and hyperactivity in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rochester, Johanna R.
    Bolden, Ashley L.
    Kwiatkowski, Carol F.
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 114 : 343 - 356
  • [38] Prenatal exposure to misoprostol and congenital anomalies: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dal Pizzol, Tatiane da Silva
    Knop, Fldvia Pozzobon
    Mengue, Sotero Serrate
    REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY, 2006, 22 (04) : 666 - 671
  • [39] Birth, cognitive and behavioral effects of intrauterine cannabis exposure in infants and children: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sorkhou, Maryam
    Singla, Daisy R.
    Castle, David J.
    George, Tony P.
    ADDICTION, 2024, 119 (03) : 411 - 437
  • [40] Adverse Birth Outcomes and Birth Telomere Length: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Niu, Zhongzheng
    Li, Karen
    Xie, Chuanbo
    Wen, Xiaozhong
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2020, 75 (05) : 267 - 268