Prenatal molecular cytogenetic diagnosis of partial tetrasomy 10p due to neocentromere formation in an inversion duplication analphoid marker chromosome

被引:27
|
作者
Levy, B
Papenhausen, PR
Tepperberg, JH
Dunn, TM
Fallet, S
Magid, MS
Kardon, NB
Hirschhorn, K
Warburton, PE
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Human Genet, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Pediat, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Pathol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[4] Lab Corp Amer, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[5] Newark Beth Israel Med Ctr, Childrens Hosp New Jersey, Newark, NJ USA
来源
CYTOGENETICS AND CELL GENETICS | 2000年 / 91卷 / 1-4期
关键词
D O I
10.1159/000056839
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Neocentromeres are fully functional centromeres found on rearranged or marker chromosomes that have separated from endogenous centromeres. Neocentromeres often result in partial tri- or tetrasomy because their formation confers mitotic stability to acentric chromosome fragments that would normally be lost. We describe the prenatal identification and characterization of a de novo supernumerary marker chromosome (SMC) containing a neocentromere in a 20-wk fetus by the combined use of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). GTG-banding of fetal metaphases revealed a 47,XY,+mar karyotype in 100% of cultured amniocytes; parental karyotypes were both normal. Although sequential tricolor FISH using chromosome-specific painting probes identified a chromosome 10 origin of the marker, a complete panel of chromosome-specific centromeric satellite DNA probes failed to hybridize to any portion of the marker. The presence of a neocentromere on the marker chromosome was confirmed by the absence of hybridization of an all-human-centromere alpha-satellite DNA probe, which hybridizes to all normal centromeres, and the presence of centromere protein (CENP)-C, which is associated specifically with active kinetochores. Based on CGH analysis and FISH with a chromosome 10p subtelomeric probe, the marker was found to be an inversion duplication of the distal portion of chromosome 10p. Thus, the proband's karyotype was 47,XY,+inv dup(10)(pter-->p14 similar to 15::p14 similar to 15-->neo-->pter), which is the first report of partial tetrasomy 10p resulting from an analphoid marker chromosome with a neocentromere. This study illustrates the use of several molecular strategies in distinguishing centric alphoid markers from neocentric analphoid markers. Copyright (C) 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:165 / 170
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Molecular cytogenetic analysis of partial monosomy 10p and trisomy 10q resulting from familial pericentric inversion (10): a first case report in Chinese population
    Jianlong Zhuang
    Chunnuan Chen
    Rongfu Huang
    Qi Luo
    Yuying Jiang
    Shuhong Zeng
    Yuanbai Wang
    Yingjun Xie
    Molecular Cytogenetics, 15
  • [22] Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of mosaicism for a small supernumerary marker chromosome derived from ring chromosome 4
    Chen, Chih-Ping
    Chen, Ming
    Su, Yi-Ning
    Tsai, Fuu-Jen
    Chern, Schu-Rern
    Wu, Pei-Chen
    Chen, Wen-Lin
    Chen, Li-Feng
    Pan, Chen-Wen
    Wang, Wayseen
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 50 (02): : 188 - 195
  • [23] Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of mosaicism for a small supernumerary marker chromosome derived from ring chromosome 2
    Chen, Chih-Ping
    Chen, Ming
    Chern, Schu-Rern
    Wu, Peih-Shan
    Chang, Shun-Ping
    Lee, Dong-Jay
    Chen, Yu-Ting
    Chen, Li-Feng
    Su, Jun-Wei
    Hsieh, Alan Hwa-Ruey
    Hsieh, Alex Hwa-Jiun
    Wang, Wayseen
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 51 (03): : 411 - 417
  • [24] Molecular characterization of an analphoid supernumerary marker chromosome derived from 18q22.1→qter in prenatal diagnosis: a case report
    Altieri, Vincenzo
    Capozzi, Oronzo
    Marzano, Maria Cristina
    Catapano, Oriana
    Di Biase, Immacolata
    Rocchi, Mariano
    De Tollis, Giuliana
    MOLECULAR CYTOGENETICS, 2014, 7
  • [25] Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of an inherited microdeletion of chromosome 16p11.2
    Li, Meihua
    Liu, Linlin
    Wu, Yijun
    Guan, Jian
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 50 (07)
  • [26] Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic analysis of pure chromosome 10p15.3 microdeletion using chromosomal microarray analysis
    Na Zhang
    Nan Huang
    Yu’e Chen
    Xinying Chen
    Jianlong Zhuang
    BMC Medical Genomics, 17 (1)
  • [27] Prenatal diagnosis of mosaic tetrasomy 10p associated with megacisterna magna, echogenic focus of left ventricle, umbilical cord cysts and distal arthrogryposis
    Wu, YC
    Yu, MT
    Chen, LC
    Chen, CL
    Yang, ML
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2003, 117A (03): : 278 - 281
  • [28] Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of a familial small supernumerary marker chromosome derived from the acrocentric chromosome 14/22
    Chen, Chih-Ping
    Chen, Ming
    Ma, Gwo-Chin
    Chang, Shun-Ping
    Chern, Schu-Rern
    Chen, Shin-Wen
    Wu, Fang-Tzu
    Chen, Wen-Lin
    Lee, Meng-Shan
    Chen, Yun-Yi
    Wang, Wayseen
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 61 (02): : 364 - 367
  • [29] Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of partial dup(18q)/del(18p) due to a paternal pericentric inversion 18 in a fetus with multiple anomalies
    Lee, Min Jin
    Park, Sang Hee
    Shim, Sung Han
    Moon, Myoung-Jin
    Cha, Dong Hyun
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 58 (03): : 318 - 323
  • [30] Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of partial dup (18p)/del (18q) due to a maternal pericentric inversion 18 in a foetus with multiple anomalies
    Atli, Emine Ikbal
    Atli, Engin
    Inan, Cihan
    Varol, Gulizar Fusun
    Mail, Cisem
    Erbilen, Esra Altan
    Yalcintepe, Sinem
    Demir, Selma
    Gurkan, Hakan
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 61 (03): : 504 - 509