Evidence-based interventions and nurse-sensitive outcomes in district nursing care: A systematic review

被引:7
|
作者
Veldhuizen, J. D. [1 ,5 ]
Hafsteinsdottir, T. B. [1 ,2 ]
Mikkers, M. C. [3 ,4 ]
Bleijenberg, N. [1 ,2 ]
Schuurmans, M. J. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci Utrecht, Fac Hlth Care, Res Ctr Hlth & Sustainable Living, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Div Julius, Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Dept Gen Practice, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Dutch Healthcare Author NZa, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Tilburg Sch Econ & Management, Dept Econ, Tilburg, Netherlands
[5] Postbus 1201, NL-3501 AA Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Community health nursing; District nursing; Evidence-based nursing; Health care outcome assessment; Systematic review; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PREVENTIVE HOME VISITS; OLDER-PEOPLE; HEALTH-PROMOTION; PROGRAM; MANAGEMENT; RISK; MOBILITY; QUALITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnsa.2021.100053
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Measuring nursing interventions and nurse-sensitive outcomes in a standardized manner is essential because it provides insight into the quality of delivered care. However, there is currently no systematic overview of the interventions conducted by district nurses, the evidence for the effects of these interventions, or what nurse-sensitive outcomes should be measured. Objective: 1) To provide an overview of interventions for community-living older people evaluated in district nursing care and evidence for the effects of these interventions and 2) to identify the nurse-sensitive outcomes that are used to evaluate these district nursing care interventions, how these outcomes are measured, and in which patient groups they are applied. Design: A systematic review of the literature. Setting: District nursing care. Data sources: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and EMBASE. Methods: Only experimental studies evaluating district nursing care interventions for communkity-living older people were included. A data extraction form was developed to extract the study characteristics and evaluate interventions and nurse-sensitive outcomes. The methodological quality of the included studies was reviewed using the 13-item critical appraisal tool for randomized controlled trials by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Results: A total of 22 studies were included. The methodological quality of the studies varied, with scores ranging from 6 to 11 on a scale of 0-13. The 22 interventions identified were heterogeneous with respect to intervention components, intervention delivery, and target population. The 44 outcomes identified were grouped into categories following the Nursing Outcome Classification and were measured in various ways and at various times. Conclusion: This is the first systematic review summarizing the evidence for the effectiveness of nurse-led interventions conducted by district nurses on community-living older people. It is unclear what interventions are effective and what outcomes should be used to substantiate district nursing care effectiveness. Because only studies with experimental designs were included, this analysis may provide an incomplete assessment of the effectiveness of interventions in district nursing care. Therefore, it is highly necessary to produce methodologically strong evidence through research programs focusing on district nursing care.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Outcomes sensitive to critical care nurse staffing levels: A systematic review
    Rae, Pamela J. L.
    Pearce, Susie
    Greaves, P. Jane
    Dall'Ora, Chiara
    Griffiths, Peter
    Endacott, Ruth
    INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2021, 67
  • [22] EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING INTERVENTIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR PRONE POSITIONING OF ADULT, VENTILATED PATIENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Nortje, Suegnet
    Nel, Elsabe
    Nolte, Anna
    HEALTH SA GESONDHEID, 2008, 13 (02):
  • [23] The effect of nurse-to-patient ratios on nurse-sensitive patient outcomes in acute specialist units: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Driscoll, Andrea
    Grant, Maria J.
    Carroll, Diane
    Dalton, Sally
    Deaton, Christi
    Jones, Ian
    Lehwaldt, Daniela
    McKee, Gabrielle
    Munyombwe, Theresa
    Astin, Felicity
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2018, 17 (01) : 6 - 22
  • [24] Theory-based and evidence-based nursing interventions for the prevention of ICU-acquired weakness in the intensive care unit: A systematic review
    Xu, Qin
    Tan, Jie
    Wang, Yixuan
    Tang, Manli
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (09):
  • [25] Primary Care Physicians’ Knowledge of Autism and Evidence-Based Interventions for Autism: A Systematic Review
    Gerard McCormack
    Alison C. Dillon
    Olive Healy
    Chloe Walsh
    Sinéad Lydon
    Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2020, 7 : 226 - 241
  • [26] Primary Care Physicians' Knowledge of Autism and Evidence-Based Interventions for Autism: A Systematic Review
    McCormack, Gerard
    Dillon, Alison C.
    Healy, Olive
    Walsh, Chloe
    Lydon, Sinead
    REVIEW JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2020, 7 (03) : 226 - 241
  • [27] A Systematic Review of Nursing Home Palliative Care Interventions: Characteristics and Outcomes
    Carpenter, Joan G.
    Lam, Karissa
    Ritter, Ashley Z.
    Ersek, Mary
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 21 (05) : 583 - +
  • [28] Central Line Care and Management: Adopting Evidence-Based Nursing Interventions
    Jarding, Emily K.
    Makic, Mary Beth Flynn
    JOURNAL OF PERIANESTHESIA NURSING, 2021, 36 (04) : 328 - 333
  • [29] Nonpharmacological Interventions to Prevent Delirium: An Evidence-Based Systematic Review
    Rivosecchi, Ryan M.
    Smithburger, Pamela L.
    Svec, Susan
    Campbell, Shauna
    Kane-Gill, Sandra L.
    CRITICAL CARE NURSE, 2015, 35 (01) : 39 - 51
  • [30] Evidence-Based Evaluation of eHealth Interventions: Systematic Literature Review
    Enam, Amia
    Torres-Bonilla, Johanna
    Eriksson, Henrik
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2018, 20 (11)