Enhancing clinician and patient understanding of radiology reports: a scoping review of international guidelines

被引:16
|
作者
Farmer, Caitlin I. [1 ,2 ]
Bourne, Allison M. [1 ,2 ]
O'Connor, Denise [1 ,2 ]
Jarvik, Jeffrey G. [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Buchbinder, Rachelle [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cabrini Inst, Monash Dept Clin Epidemiol, 4 Drysdale St, Malvern, Vic 3144, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Sch Med & Hlth Serv, Dept Radiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Sch Med & Hlth Serv, Dept Neurol Surg, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Pharm, Seattle, WA USA
[6] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed & Sports Med, Seattle, WA USA
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会; 美国国家卫生研究院; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Comprehension; Diagnostic imaging; Guidelines as topic; Radiology; Review; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY REPORTS; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; IMPLEMENTATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; LANGUAGE; FEEDBACK; SYSTEM; MRI;
D O I
10.1186/s13244-020-00864-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Imaging reports are the primary method of communicating diagnostic imaging findings between the radiologist and the referring clinician. Guidelines produced by professional bodies provide guidance on content and format of imaging reports, but the extent to which they consider comprehensibility for referring clinicians and their patients is unclear. The objective of this review was to determine the extent to which radiology reporting guidelines consider comprehensibility of imaging reports for referring clinicians and patients. We performed a scoping review of English-language diagnostic imaging reporting guidelines. We searched electronic databases (OVID MEDLINE, Embase) and websites of radiological professional organisations to identify guidelines. The extent to which the guidelines recommended essential report features such as technical information, content, format and language, as well as features to enhance comprehensibility, such as lay language summaries, was recorded. Six guidelines from professional bodies representing radiologists from the USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, Hong Kong, the UK and Europe were identified from the search. Inconsistencies exist between guidelines in their recommendations, and they rarely consider that patients may read the report. No guideline made recommendations about the reporting of results considering the clinical context, and none recommended features preferred by patients such as lay language summaries. This review identifies an opportunity for future radiology reporting guidelines to give greater consideration to referring clinician and patient preferences.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] National and International Guidelines for Patient Blood Management in Obstetrics: A Qualitative Review
    Shaylor, Ruth
    Weiniger, Carolyn F.
    Austin, Naola
    Tzabazis, Alexander
    Shander, Aryeh
    Goodnough, Lawrence T.
    Butwick, Alexander J.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2017, 124 (01): : 216 - 232
  • [42] Pilot study of clinician attitudes to pump therapy: International differences and the need for a greater understanding of the patient perspective
    Reaney, M.
    Barnard, K.
    Skinner, T. C.
    Speight, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 (06) : A276 - A276
  • [43] INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH AND GUIDELINES ON POST-TUBERCULOSIS CHRONIC LUNG DISORDERS: A SYSTEMATIC SCOPING REVIEW
    van Kampen, S. C.
    Wanner, A.
    Edwards, M.
    Harries, A. D.
    Kirenga, B.
    Chakaya, J.
    Jones, R.
    THORAX, 2018, 73 : A221 - A222
  • [44] International research and guidelines on post-tuberculosis chronic lung disorders: a systematic scoping review
    van Kampen, Sanne C.
    Wanner, Amanda
    Edwards, Miles
    Harries, Anthony D.
    Kirenga, Bruce J.
    Chakaya, Jeremiah
    Jones, Rupert
    BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2018, 3 (04):
  • [45] BUILDING INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS ON GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCHERS INTERACTING WITH THE FOOD INDUSTRY: SYSTEMATIC SCOPING REVIEW, DELPHI STUDY AND INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP
    Cullerton, K.
    Adams, J.
    Forouhi, N.
    Francis, O.
    White, M.
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2018, 72 : A42 - A43
  • [46] Understanding the use of patient-reported data by health care insurers: A scoping review
    Neubert, Anne
    Brito Fernandes, Oscar
    Lucevic, Armin
    Pavlova, Milena
    Gulacsi, Laszlo
    Baji, Petra
    Klazinga, Niek
    Kringos, Dionne
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (12):
  • [47] Does virtual reality in the perioperative setting for patient education improve understanding? A scoping review
    Shepherd, Talia
    Trinder, Matthew
    Theophilus, Mary
    SURGERY IN PRACTICE AND SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [48] An Assessment of Current Clinician-Reported and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Alopecia Areata: A Scoping Review
    Xia, Eric
    Li, Sara J.
    Drake, Lara
    Reyes-Hadsall, Sophia
    Mita, Carol
    Drucker, Aaron M.
    Mostaghimi, Arash
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2023, 143 (07) : 1133 - 1137.e12
  • [49] Platform-Based Patient-Clinician Digital Health Interventions for Care Transitions: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Backman, Chantal
    Papp, Steve
    Harley, Anne
    Kolle, Aurelie Tonjock
    Visintini, Sarah
    Shah, Soha
    Berdusco, Randa
    Poitras, Stephane
    Beaule, Paul E.
    French-Merkley, Veronique
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2023, 12
  • [50] Methodological Approaches for Analyzing Medication Error Reports in Patient Safety Reporting Systems: A Scoping Review
    Tchijevitch, Olga
    Hansen, Sebrina Maj-Britt
    Hallas, Jesper
    Bogh, Soren Bie
    Mulac, Alma
    Walloe, Sisse
    Clausen, Mette Kring
    Birkeland, Soren
    JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2025, 51 (01):