On the Tightness of Convex Optimal Power Flow Model Based on Power Loss Relaxation

被引:0
|
作者
Yuan, Zhao [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iceland, Elect Power Syst Lab EPS Lab, Reykjavik, Iceland
关键词
Optimal Power Flow; Convex Reformulation; Power Load; Tightness; Penalty Function;
D O I
10.1109/ISGTEUROPE52324.2021.9639934
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Optimal power flow (OPF) is the important decision-making model in operating the power system. The improvement of the OPF solution quality can provide huge technical and economic benefits. The convex reformulation of the original non-convex alternating current OPF (ACOPF) model is an efficient way to find the global optimal solution of the ACOPF model but disadvantages with the relaxation gaps. The existence of relaxation gaps hinders the practical application of convex OPF due to the AC-infeasibility problem. We evaluate and improve the tightness of the convex ACOPF model in this paper. Various power networks and nodal loads are considered in the evaluation. A unified evaluation framework is implemented in Julia programming language. This evaluation shows the sensitivity of the relaxation gaps and helps to benchmark the proposed tightness reinforcement approach (TRA). The proposed TRA is based on the penalty function method which penalizes the power loss relaxation in the objective function of the convex ACOPF model. A heuristic penalty algorithm is proposed to find the proper penalty parameter of the TRA. Numerical results show relaxation gaps exist in test cases especially for large-scale power networks under low nodal power loads. TRA is effective to reduce the relaxation gaps of the convex ACOPF model.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 361
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Optimal Power Flow for AC-DC Grids: Formulation, Convex Relaxation, Linear Approximation, and Implementation
    Ergun, Hakan
    Dave, Jaykumar
    Van Hertem, Dirk
    Geth, Frederik
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2019, 34 (04) : 2980 - 2990
  • [42] Transmission loss allocation based on optimal power flow and sensitivity analysis
    Belati, E. A.
    da Costa, G. R. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2008, 30 (04) : 291 - 295
  • [43] Optimal Reactive Power Flow In The Presence of Wind Power For Active Power Loss Minimization
    Amrane, Y.
    Boudour, M.
    Ladjici, A. A.
    Elmaouhab, A.
    Belazzoug, M.
    Lamari, M.
    PROCEEDINGS 2018 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES IN MAGHREB (CISTEM), 2018, : 462 - 467
  • [44] Sparse Tableau Relaxation for the Optimal Power Flow Problem
    Park, Byungkwon
    DeMarco, Christopher L.
    2017 55TH ANNUAL ALLERTON CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATION, CONTROL, AND COMPUTING (ALLERTON), 2017, : 315 - 323
  • [45] Penalized Parabolic Relaxation for Optimal Power Flow Problem
    Zohrizadeh, Fariba
    Kheirandishfard, Mohsen
    Quarm, Edward Jnr
    Madani, Ramtin
    2018 IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2018, : 1616 - 1623
  • [46] Fragility of the Semidefinite Relaxation for the Optimal Power Flow Problem
    Zorin, Ivan
    Vasilyev, Sergey
    Gryazina, Elena
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE SCIENCE OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (ICSEE), 2016,
  • [47] Error bound of convex approximation for optimal power flow model: A general solving approach based on optimality gap
    Fan, Zhexin
    Yang, Zhifang
    Yu, Juan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2024, 157
  • [48] Convex Relaxations of Chance Constrained AC Optimal Power Flow
    Venzke, Andreas
    Halilbasic, Lejla
    Markovic, Uros
    Hug, Gabriela
    Chatzivasileiadis, Spyros
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2018, 33 (03) : 2829 - 2841
  • [49] Robust AC Optimal Power Flow With Robust Convex Restriction
    Lee, Dongchan
    Turitsyn, Konstantin
    Molzahn, Daniel K.
    Roald, Line A.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2021, 36 (06) : 4953 - 4966
  • [50] Optimal Power Flow on DC Microgrids: A Quadratic Convex Approximation
    Montoya, Oscar Danilo
    Gil-Gonzalez, Walter
    Garces, Alejandro
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS II-EXPRESS BRIEFS, 2019, 66 (06) : 1018 - 1022