Can we improve the cytologic examination of malignant pleural effusions using molecular analysis?

被引:33
|
作者
Brock, MV
Hooker, CM
Yung, R
Guo, MZ
Han, Y
Ames, SE
Chang, D
Yang, SC
Mason, D
Sussman, M
Baylin, SB
Herman, JG
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Surg, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Div Thorac Surg, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Med Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Surg, Div Surg Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[7] Cleveland Clin, Dept Thorac Surg, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
来源
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY | 2005年 / 80卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.05.088
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Currently, 40% of patients remain undiagnosed after routine cytologic examination for malignant pleural effusions. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) methylation is a robust strategy for detecting cancer early in tissue. We hypothesized that DNA methylation would be more sensitive in diagnosing patients with malignant pleural effusions than cytology. Methods. We conducted a prospective cohort study of 31 inpatients with pleural effusions (24 malignant pleural effusions metastatic from 10 different organs and 7 benign) over 18 months. Aspirated pleural fluid underwent cytologic examination and DNA extraction for nested methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We assayed for promoter hypermethylation in 8 genes known to be methylated in many cancers. Pleural fluid was considered positive if 2 or more genes were methylated by methylation-specific PCR. Results. Cytology alone confirmed malignant pleural effusions in 15 of 24 patients (sensitivity 63%), whereas methylation alone positively identified 16 of 24 patients (sensitivity 67%). Both tests had 100% specificity in predicting benign effusions. If cytology and methylation were considered together, they exhibited 88% sensitivity and 100% specificity in discriminating benign and malignant effusions. Combined, the two assays were more sensitive than either test alone. Although the positive predictive value of each test was 100%, the negative predictive value of cytology and methylation combined was 78%, better than 47% and 44% for methylation and cytology alone, respectively. Conclusions. Epigenetic analysis of pleural fluid can detect malignant DNA from a variety of neoplasms, provide complementarity with cytology, and improve the diagnostic yield of the current standard examination of pleural fluid.
引用
收藏
页码:1241 / 1247
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Management of malignant pleural effusions using the Pleurx catheter
    Warren, William H.
    Kalimi, Robert
    Khodadadian, Lisa M.
    Kim, Anthony W.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2008, 85 (03): : 1049 - 1055
  • [22] Malignant pleural effusions due to small-cell lung carcinoma: A cytologic and immunocytochemical study
    Chhieng, DC
    Ko, EC
    Yee, HT
    Shultz, JJ
    Dorvault, CC
    Eltoum, IA
    DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2001, 25 (06) : 356 - 360
  • [23] Can tuberculous pleural effusions be diagnosed by pleural fluid analysis alone?
    Sahn, S. A.
    Huggins, J. T.
    San Jose, M. E.
    Alvarez-Dobano, J. M.
    Valdes, L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TUBERCULOSIS AND LUNG DISEASE, 2013, 17 (06) : 787 - 793
  • [24] Cost Effectiveness Analysis Of Strategies For Managing Malignant Pleural Effusions
    Ryder, H.
    Ankrom, A.
    Gocklin, P.
    Michaud, G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 183
  • [25] Pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusions (MPE): A meta-analysis
    Agarwal, R
    Shaw, P
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 86 : S60 - S60
  • [26] Predicting malignant and tuberculous pleural effusions through demographics and pleural fluid analysis of patients
    Valdes, Luis
    San-Jose, Esther
    Ferreiro, Lucia
    Golpe, Antonio
    Gonzalez-Barcala, Francisco-Javier
    Toubes, Maria E.
    Rodriguez-Alvarez, Maria X.
    Alvarez-Dobano, Jose M.
    Rodriguez-Nunez, Nuria
    Rabade, Carlos
    Gude, Francisco
    CLINICAL RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2015, 9 (02): : 203 - 213
  • [27] Management of recurrent transudative pleural effusions: can we REDUCE unnecessary interventions?
    Gilbert, Christopher R.
    Porcel, Jose M.
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2022, 59 (02)
  • [28] Analysis of pleural effusions using flow cytometry
    Ceyhan, BB
    Demiralp, E
    Celikel, T
    RESPIRATION, 1996, 63 (01) : 17 - 24
  • [29] Detection of K-ras point mutations in the supernatants of peritoneal and pleural effusions for diagnosis complementary to cytologic examination
    Yamashita, K
    Kuba, T
    Shinoda, H
    Takahashi, E
    Okayasu, I
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1998, 109 (06) : 704 - 711
  • [30] DNA ANALYSIS OF MALIGNANT EFFUSIONS - COMPARISON WITH CYTOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS AND CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN CONTENT
    PINTO, MM
    ANALYTICAL AND QUANTITATIVE CYTOLOGY AND HISTOLOGY, 1992, 14 (03): : 222 - 226