Main determinants for ecological footprint: an econometric perspective from G20 countries

被引:21
|
作者
Ansari, Mohd Arshad [1 ]
Haider, Salman [2 ,3 ]
Kumar, Pushp [4 ]
Kumar, Siddharth [4 ]
Akram, Vaseem [5 ]
机构
[1] Akal Univ, Dept Econ, Bathinda 151302, Punjab, India
[2] Univ Delhi, Inst Econ Growth, New Delhi, India
[3] Univ Delhi, Ctr Dev Econ, New Delhi, India
[4] Indian Inst Technol Bhubaneswar, Sch Humanities Social Sci & Management, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
[5] Indian Inst Management Jammu, Econ & Business Environm Area, Old Univ Campus,Canal Rd, Jammu 180016, Jammu & Kashmir, India
关键词
Ecological footprint; Economic growth; Renewable energy; Environmental kuznets curve; Globalization; Cross-sectional dependency; ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVE; RENEWABLE ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; UNIT-ROOT TESTS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; PANEL-DATA; CO2; EMISSIONS; URBANIZATION; INCOME; EKC; GLOBALIZATION;
D O I
10.1007/s40974-022-00240-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Unsurprisingly, many studies consider CO2 emissions to capture the environment quality needed for testing the augmented environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis. However, this is a major limitation of the existing literature because CO2 alone cannot account for environmental pollution. By employing a more comprehensive proxy ecological footprint, this study aims to examine EKC in G20 economies during 1991-2016. To achieve the objective, a second-generation panel data model was implemented, which accounted for the heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence. The findings reveal that environmental degradation has an inverted N-shaped linkage with economic growth in the selected countries. It is further observed that globalization, renewable energy consumption, and urbanization improve the environmental quality, whereas non-renewable energy consumption mitigates the quality of environment in G20 countries. With these conclusions, it is suggested that policymakers from these countries should emphasize on more renewable energy usage.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 267
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Main determinants for ecological footprint: an econometric perspective from G20 countries
    Mohd Arshad Ansari
    Salman Haider
    Pushp Kumar
    Siddharth Kumar
    Vaseem Akram
    [J]. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 2022, 7 : 250 - 267
  • [2] Forecasting the ecological footprint of G20 countries in the next 30 years
    Espinosa, Rafael M. Eufrasio
    Koh, S. C. Lenny
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [3] Impact of institutional quality on ecological footprint: New insights from G20 countries
    Azimi, Mohammad Naim
    Rahman, Mohammad Mafizur
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 423
  • [4] Does ecological footprint affect biocapacity? Evidence from the experiences of G20 countries
    Shen, Yongchang
    Yue, Shujing
    [J]. NATURAL RESOURCE MODELING, 2023, 36 (03)
  • [5] The impact of energy efficiency on ecological footprint in the presence of EKC: Evidence from G20 countries
    Luo, Heng
    Sun, Ying
    [J]. ENERGY, 2024, 304
  • [6] Is there deterministic, stochastic, and/or club convergence in ecological footprint indicator among G20 countries?
    Bilgili, Faik
    Ulucak, Recep
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (35) : 35404 - 35419
  • [7] Is there deterministic, stochastic, and/or club convergence in ecological footprint indicator among G20 countries?
    Faik Bilgili
    Recep Ulucak
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25 : 35404 - 35419
  • [8] Ecological Footprint and Its Determinants in MENA Countries: A Spatial Econometric Approach
    Ramezani, Mohammadreza
    Abolhassani, Leili
    Foroushani, Naser Shahnoushi
    Burgess, Diane
    Aminizadeh, Milad
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (18)
  • [9] Constructing a predicting model for ecological footprint in G20 countries through artificial neural network
    Roumiani, Ahmad
    Shakarami, Kiyan
    Arian, Abdul Basir
    [J]. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2024,
  • [10] The Measurement of Financial Openness: From The Perspective of G20 Countries
    Yu, Ning
    [J]. ECONOMICS AND FINANCE RESEARCH, 2011, 4 : 36 - 40