Does ecological footprint affect biocapacity? Evidence from the experiences of G20 countries

被引:3
|
作者
Shen, Yongchang [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Yue, Shujing [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Jianzhu Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Dept Econ, Hefei, Peoples R China
[2] Southeast Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Dept Econ, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Southeast Univ, Inst Socialist Dev Chinese Characterist, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[4] Anhui Jianzhu Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Hefei 230022, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
biocapacity; ecological footprint; panel smooth transition regression; EMISSIONS EVIDENCE; CARRYING-CAPACITY; KUZNETS CURVE; NEW-ZEALAND; SUSTAINABILITY; GROWTH; CHINA; TIME;
D O I
10.1111/nrm.12369
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The use of the difference between ecological footprint and biocapacity to evaluate the sustainable development of a country may be biased. Therefore, we discuss the nonlinear impact of the ecological footprint on biocapacity from the perspective of the self-regulation capacity of the ecosystem, which provides a new perspective for evaluating the sustainability of a country. Using panel data of the G20 countries, this study establishes a panel smooth transition model with a continuous transition process, which abandons the constraints of linear models and agrees with the gradual characteristics of ecosystem evolution. The results show that: (1) For the G20 countries, the influence of ecological footprint on biocapacity presents an inverted "U" curve. (2) From the perspective of the degree of development of a country, the growth of the ecological footprint of a developing country will weaken its biocapacity, whereas that of a developed country will enhance its biocapacity. (3) Economic growth weakens biocapacity, and overheated economic growth may have an irreversible impact on the ecosystem. (4) Technological progress and population density growth will enhance biocapacity.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The impact of energy efficiency on ecological footprint in the presence of EKC: Evidence from G20 countries
    Luo, Heng
    Sun, Ying
    [J]. ENERGY, 2024, 304
  • [2] Main determinants for ecological footprint: an econometric perspective from G20 countries
    Ansari, Mohd Arshad
    Haider, Salman
    Kumar, Pushp
    Kumar, Siddharth
    Akram, Vaseem
    [J]. ENERGY ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 7 (03) : 250 - 267
  • [3] Main determinants for ecological footprint: an econometric perspective from G20 countries
    Mohd Arshad Ansari
    Salman Haider
    Pushp Kumar
    Siddharth Kumar
    Vaseem Akram
    [J]. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 2022, 7 : 250 - 267
  • [4] How does Digitalization Affect Trade in Goods and Services? Evidence from G20 Countries
    Yin, Zi Hui
    Choi, Chang Hwan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2024,
  • [5] Does financial structure affect renewable energy consumption? Evidence from G20 countries
    Appiah-Otoo, Isaac
    Chen, Xudong
    Ampah, Jeffrey Dankwa
    [J]. ENERGY, 2023, 272
  • [6] Forecasting the ecological footprint of G20 countries in the next 30 years
    Espinosa, Rafael M. Eufrasio
    Koh, S. C. Lenny
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [7] Impact of institutional quality on ecological footprint: New insights from G20 countries
    Azimi, Mohammad Naim
    Rahman, Mohammad Mafizur
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 423
  • [8] Does financial structure affect CO2 emissions? Evidence from G20 countries
    Yao, Xingyuan
    Tang, Xiaobo
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 41
  • [9] Is there deterministic, stochastic, and/or club convergence in ecological footprint indicator among G20 countries?
    Bilgili, Faik
    Ulucak, Recep
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (35) : 35404 - 35419
  • [10] Is there deterministic, stochastic, and/or club convergence in ecological footprint indicator among G20 countries?
    Faik Bilgili
    Recep Ulucak
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25 : 35404 - 35419