A survey of environmental tobacco smoke controls in California office buildings

被引:18
|
作者
Liu, KS
Alevantis, LE
Offermann, FJ
机构
[1] Calif Dept Hlth Serv, Indoor Air Qual Sect, Environm Hlth Lab Branch, Div Environm & Occupat Dis Control, Berkeley, CA 94704 USA
[2] Indoor Environm Engn, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
environmental tobacco smoke; designated smoking area; office building; nicotine; fluorescent particulate matter; sulfur hexafluoride;
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-0668.2001.011001026.x
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A survey of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) controls in California office buildings was carried out to obtain information on the type and distribution of ETS controls in office buildings and to evaluate the effectiveness of various ETS controls. A total of 118 smoking areas in 111 county and city buildings were inspected to collect information on the type of ETS controls. Only 31% of the smoking areas inspected were physically separated from nonsmoking areas with full floor-to-true-ceiling walls, 25% exhausted air to the outside, and 38% did not recirculate air to non-smoking areas. A total of 23 smoking areas and their adjacent non-smoking areas in 21 buildings were monitored for nicotine and fluorescent particulate matter (FPM). A tracer gas, sulfur hexafluoride (SF(6)), was released in smoking areas to measure the air leakage from smoking areas to adjacent non-smoking areas. The measurements of nicotine, FPM, and SF(6) have shown large variations of the effectiveness of ETS controls. The least effective type of smoking area studied were open areas with no physical barriers between smoking and nonsmoking areas, no exhaust to the outside and no return air separation. On the contrary, smoking rooms with three ETS controls (i.e., physical separation, exhaust to outside, and no air recirculation) were the most effective design in containing ETS within smoking areas.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 34
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and breast cancer: A review by the California Environmental Protection Agency
    Miller, Mark D.
    Marty, Melanie A.
    Broadwin, Rachel
    Johnson, Kenneth C.
    Salmon, Andrew G.
    Winder, Bruce
    Steinmaus, Craig
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2007, 44 (02) : 93 - 106
  • [22] The carcinogenicity of environmental tobacco smoke
    Witschi, H
    Espiritu, I
    Peake, JL
    Wu, K
    Maronpot, RR
    Pinkerton, KE
    CARCINOGENESIS, 1997, 18 (03) : 575 - 586
  • [23] Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke
    不详
    TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 19 (04) : IV - V
  • [24] The toxicology of environmental tobacco smoke
    Witschi, H
    Joad, JP
    Pinkerton, KE
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY, 1997, 37 : 29 - 52
  • [25] ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO-SMOKE
    RODGMAN, A
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1992, 16 (03) : 223 - 244
  • [26] Environmental tobacco smoke in rats
    Isik, ACÜ
    Kalender, Y
    Yardimci, S
    Ergün, A
    JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2004, 33 (06): : 382 - 386
  • [27] Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS)
    Johnson, Kenneth C.
    CHRONIC DISEASES IN CANADA, 2010, 29 : 128 - 143
  • [28] Environmental tobacco smoke epidemiology
    Bucher, JR
    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1999, 107 (08) : A395 - A395
  • [29] Environmental tobacco smoke - Reply
    Barry, D
    RISK ANALYSIS, 1996, 16 (03) : 303 - 304
  • [30] ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO-SMOKE
    ETZEL, RA
    IMMUNOLOGY AND ALLERGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1994, 14 (03) : 621 - 633