A survey of environmental tobacco smoke controls in California office buildings

被引:18
|
作者
Liu, KS
Alevantis, LE
Offermann, FJ
机构
[1] Calif Dept Hlth Serv, Indoor Air Qual Sect, Environm Hlth Lab Branch, Div Environm & Occupat Dis Control, Berkeley, CA 94704 USA
[2] Indoor Environm Engn, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
environmental tobacco smoke; designated smoking area; office building; nicotine; fluorescent particulate matter; sulfur hexafluoride;
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-0668.2001.011001026.x
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A survey of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) controls in California office buildings was carried out to obtain information on the type and distribution of ETS controls in office buildings and to evaluate the effectiveness of various ETS controls. A total of 118 smoking areas in 111 county and city buildings were inspected to collect information on the type of ETS controls. Only 31% of the smoking areas inspected were physically separated from nonsmoking areas with full floor-to-true-ceiling walls, 25% exhausted air to the outside, and 38% did not recirculate air to non-smoking areas. A total of 23 smoking areas and their adjacent non-smoking areas in 21 buildings were monitored for nicotine and fluorescent particulate matter (FPM). A tracer gas, sulfur hexafluoride (SF(6)), was released in smoking areas to measure the air leakage from smoking areas to adjacent non-smoking areas. The measurements of nicotine, FPM, and SF(6) have shown large variations of the effectiveness of ETS controls. The least effective type of smoking area studied were open areas with no physical barriers between smoking and nonsmoking areas, no exhaust to the outside and no return air separation. On the contrary, smoking rooms with three ETS controls (i.e., physical separation, exhaust to outside, and no air recirculation) were the most effective design in containing ETS within smoking areas.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 34
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EXPOSURE TO ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO-SMOKE IN CALIFORNIA - REPLY
    PIERCE, JP
    GILPIN, E
    BORLAND, R
    JOHNSON, M
    BAL, D
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 269 (11): : 1388 - 1388
  • [2] THE MEASUREMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO-SMOKE IN 585 OFFICE ENVIRONMENTS
    TURNER, S
    CYR, L
    GROSS, AJ
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 1992, 18 (01) : 19 - 28
  • [3] SMOKE MANAGEMENT IN OFFICE BUILDINGS
    BLAZEK, W
    FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL, 1984, 7 (01) : 107 - 113
  • [4] THE MEASUREMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO-SMOKE IN 585 OFFICE ENVIRONMENTS - A REPLY
    TURNER, S
    CYR, L
    GROSS, AJ
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 1992, 18 (03) : 318 - 321
  • [5] Environmental tobacco smoke exposure among Korean American nonsmokers in California
    Hughes, Suzanne C.
    Corcos, Isabel A.
    Hofstetter, C. Richard
    Hovell, Melbourne F.
    Irvin, Veronica L.
    NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2008, 10 (04) : 663 - 670
  • [6] Prevalence and patterns of environmental tobacco smoke exposures among California teachers
    Reynolds, P
    Goldberg, DE
    Hurley, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 2004, 18 (05) : 358 - 365
  • [7] Daily exposure to environmental tobacco smoke: Smokers vs nonsmokers in California
    Robinson, JP
    Switzer, P
    Ott, W
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1996, 86 (09) : 1303 - 1305
  • [8] PROTECTION FROM ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO-SMOKE IN CALIFORNIA - THE CASE FOR A SMOKE-FREE WORKPLACE
    BORLAND, R
    PIERCE, JP
    BURNS, DM
    GILPIN, E
    JOHNSON, M
    BAL, D
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 268 (06): : 749 - 752
  • [9] German Environmental Survey IV: Children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke
    Conrad, Andre
    Schulz, Christine
    Seiwert, Margarete
    Becker, Kerstin
    Ullrich, Detlef
    Kolossa-Gehring, Marike
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2010, 192 (01) : 79 - 83
  • [10] Environmental tobacco smoke
    Edwards, PR
    van Tongeren, M
    Watson, A
    Gee, I
    Edwards, RE
    OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2004, 61 (05) : 385 - 386