Risk of Developing Breast Reconstruction Complications: A Machine-Learning Nomogram for Individualized Risk Estimation with and without Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy

被引:19
|
作者
Naoum, George E.
Ho, Alice Y.
Shui, Amy
Salama, Laura
Goldberg, Saveli
Arafat, Waleed
Winograd, Jonathan
Colwell, Amy
Smith, Barbara L.
Taghian, Alphonse G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, 100 Blossom St,Cox 3, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
TISSUE EXPANDER; RADIOTHERAPY; OUTCOMES; IMMEDIATE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000008635
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to create a nomogram using machine learning models predicting risk of breast reconstruction complications with or without postmastectomy radiation therapy. Methods: Between 1997 and 2017, 1617 breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy and breast reconstruction were analyzed. Those with autologous, tissueexpander/implant, and single-stage direct-to-implant reconstruction were included. Postmastectomy radiation therapy was delivered either with three-dimensionalconformal photon or proton therapy. Complication endpoints were defined based on surgical reintervention operative notes as infection/necrosis requiring debridement. For implant-based patients, complications were defined as capsular contracture requiring capsulotomy and implant failure. For each complication endpoint, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator penalizedregression was used to select the subset of predictors associated with the smallest prediction error from 10-fold cross-validation. Nomograms were built using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-selected predictors,and internal validation using cross-validation was performed. Results: Median follow-up was 6.6 years. Among 1617 patients, 23 percent under went autologous reconstruction, 39 percent underwent direct-to-implant reconstruction,and 37 percent underwent tissue expander/implant reconstruction.Among 759 patients who received postmastectomy radiation therapy, 8.3 percent received proton-therapy to the chest wall and nodes and 43 percent received chest wall boost. Internal validation for each model showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 73 percent for infection, 75 percent for capsular contracture, 76 percent for absolute implant failure, and 68 percent for overall implant failure. Periareolar incisions and complete implant muscle coverage were found to be important predictors for infection and capsular contracture,respectively. In a multivariable analysis, we found that protons compared to no postmastectomy radiation therapy significantly increased capsular contracture risk (OR, 15.3; p < 0.001). This was higher than the effect of photons with electron boost versus no postmastectomy radiation therapy (OR, 2.5; p = 0.01). Conclusion: Using machine learning, these nomograms provided prediction of postmastectomy breast reconstruction complications with and without radiation therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:1E / 12E
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Machine Learning Nomogram to Predict Breast Reconstruction Complications with and without Radiation
    Naoum, G. E.
    Ho, A. Y.
    Salama, L. W.
    Shui, A. M.
    Taghian, A. G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E20 - E20
  • [2] Breast Reconstruction Complications After Postmastectomy Proton Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer
    Berlin, Eva
    Yegya-Raman, Nikhil
    Hollawell, Casey
    Haertter, Allison
    Fosnot, Joshua
    Rhodes, Sylvia
    Seol, Seung Won
    Gentile, Michelle
    Li, Taoran
    Freedman, Gary M.
    Taunk, Neil K.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 9 (03)
  • [3] Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy and Breast Reconstruction An Analysis of Complications and Patient Satisfaction
    Lee, Bernard T.
    Adesiyun, Tolulope A.
    Colakoglu, Salih
    Curtis, Michael S.
    Yueh, Janet H.
    Anderson, Katarina E.
    Tobias, Adam M.
    Recht, Abram
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2010, 64 (05) : 679 - 683
  • [4] Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy and Breast Reconstruction: An Analysis of Complications and Patient Satisfaction
    Adesiyun, T. A.
    Lee, B. T.
    Yueh, J. H.
    Colakoglu, S.
    Anderson, K.
    Tobias, A. M.
    Recht, A.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 69 (24) : 740S - 741S
  • [5] Risk estimation and risk prediction using machine-learning methods
    Kruppa, Jochen
    Ziegler, Andreas
    Koenig, Inke R.
    [J]. HUMAN GENETICS, 2012, 131 (10) : 1639 - 1654
  • [6] Risk estimation and risk prediction using machine-learning methods
    Jochen Kruppa
    Andreas Ziegler
    Inke R. König
    [J]. Human Genetics, 2012, 131 : 1639 - 1654
  • [7] Individualized Risk of Surgical Complications: An Application of the Breast Reconstruction Risk Assessment Score
    Kim, John Y. S.
    Mlodinow, Alexei S.
    Khavanin, Nima
    Hume, Keith M.
    Simmons, Christopher J.
    Weiss, Michael J.
    Murphy, Robert X., Jr.
    Gutowski, Karol A.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2015, 3 (05)
  • [8] Tissue Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction with and without Postmastectomy Radiation: Predictive Factors for Complications
    Nguyen, S. K. A.
    Oxley, P.
    Rastegar, R.
    Joffres, M.
    Kwan, W.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 72
  • [9] The benefit and risk of postmastectomy radiation therapy in patients with high-risk breast cancer
    Cheng, SH
    Jian, JJM
    Chan, KY
    Tsai, SYC
    Liu, MC
    Chen, CM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1998, 21 (01): : 12 - 17
  • [10] Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction After Previous Lumpectomy and Radiation Therapy Analysis of Complications and Satisfaction
    Khansa, Ibrahim
    Colakoglu, Salih
    Curtis, Michael S.
    Yueh, Janet H.
    Ogunleye, Adeyemi
    Tobias, Adam M.
    Lee, Bernard T.
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2011, 66 (05) : 444 - 451