Private vs. public communication: Difference of opinion and reputational concerns

被引:0
|
作者
Balmaceda, Felipe [1 ]
机构
[1] Andres Bello Univ, Fac Econ & Business, Fernandez Concha 700, Santiago 7591538, Chile
关键词
Private and public communication; Transparency; Experts; Non-common priors; Reputation; Accountability; INFORMATION; TRANSPARENCY; COMMITTEES; BELIEFS; EXPERTS; DEBATE; ART;
D O I
10.1016/j.jet.2021.105314
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper studies the cost and benefits of private and public communication in a game with a pol-icy maker, a privately-informed expert, and the public. The policy maker and the expert have different opinions/views about the state of the world and both the expert and policy maker care about the expert's reputation with the public. The amount of information acquisition and transmission under private vs. public communication, depends on how much the policy maker and the expert differ in opinion. If both have either moderate or very extreme opinions, the costs and benefits are the same. In contrast, when the policy maker is moderate and the expert has more extreme opinions, private communication is better, while if the policy maker is extreme and the expert has moderate views, public communication is better. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:40
相关论文
共 50 条