Enterococci Mediate the Oviposition Preference of Drosophila melanogaster through Sucrose Catabolism

被引:34
|
作者
Liu, Wei [1 ]
Zhang, Ke [2 ]
Li, Yujuan [1 ]
Su, Wanzhen [2 ]
Hu, Kunkun [3 ]
Jin, Shan [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanxi Med Univ, Fenyang Coll, Dept Med Lab Sci, Fenyang 032200, Shanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Shanxi Med Univ, Fenyang Coll, Dept Clin Med, Fenyang 032200, Shanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Hubei Univ, Coll Life Sci, Dept Cell Biol, Wuhan 430062, Hubei, Peoples R China
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2017年 / 7卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
GUT MICROBIOTA; BEHAVIOR; HOMEOSTASIS; SELECTION; CIRCUIT; SYSTEM; DRIVES; GROWTH; MODEL;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-017-13705-5
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Sucrose, one of the main products of photosynthesis in plants, functions as a universal biomarker for nutritional content and maturity of different fruits across diverse ecological niches. Drosophila melanogaster congregates to lay eggs in rotting fruits, yet the factors that influence these decisions remains uncovered. Here, we report that lactic acid bacteria Enterococci are critical modulators to attract Drosophila to lay eggs on decaying food. Drosophila-associated Enterococci predominantly catabolize sucrose for growing their population in fly food, and thus generate a unique ecological niche with depleted sucrose, but enriched bacteria. Female flies navigate these favorable oviposition sites by probing the sucrose cue with their gustatory sensory neurons. Acquirement of indigenous microbiota facilitated the development and systemic growth of Drosophila, thereby benefiting the survival and fitness of their offspring. Thus, our finding highlights the pivotal roles of commensal bacteria in influencing host behavior, opening the door to a better understanding of the ecological relationships between the microbial and metazoan worlds.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Innate preference in Drosophila melanogaster
    ZheFeng Gong
    Science China Life Sciences, 2012, 55 : 8 - 14
  • [32] OVIPOSITION IN PERIOD MUTANTS OF DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER
    MCCABE, CJ
    BIRLEY, AJ
    MORGAN, E
    JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY CYCLE RESEARCH, 1993, 24 (04): : 224 - 224
  • [33] OVIPOSITION RHYTHM OF INDIVIDUAL DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER
    FLUEGEL, W
    EXPERIENTIA, 1978, 34 (01): : 65 - 66
  • [34] Live Drosophila melanogaster Larvae Deter Oviposition by Drosophila suzukii
    Tungadi, Trisna D.
    Shaw, Bethan
    Powell, Glen
    Hall, David R.
    Bray, Daniel P.
    Harte, Steven J.
    Farman, Dudley I.
    Wijnen, Herman
    Fountain, Michelle T.
    INSECTS, 2022, 13 (08)
  • [35] Oviposition Site Preference for Natural Breeding Sites in Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae) Populations From Argentina
    Betti, Maria I. L.
    Soto, Eduardo M.
    Hasson, Esteban
    ANNALS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2014, 107 (05) : 944 - 953
  • [36] PHENETIC DISTANCES IN THE DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER-SUBGROUP SPECIES AND OVIPOSITION-SITE PREFERENCE FOR FOOD COMPONENTS
    BOS, M
    BOEREMA, A
    GENETICA, 1981, 56 (03) : 175 - 183
  • [37] SPERM PREFERENCE IN DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER
    CHILDRESS, D
    HARTL, DL
    GENETICS, 1972, 71 (03) : 417 - +
  • [38] OVIPOSITION RESPONSE TO ETHANOL IN DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER AND DROSOPHILA-SIMULANS
    KING, S
    ROCKWELL, RF
    GROSSFIELD, J
    GENETICS, 1976, 83 (03) : S39 - S39
  • [39] OVIPOSITION SITE SELECTION BY DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER AND DROSOPHILA-SIMULANS
    CHESS, KF
    RINGO, JM
    EVOLUTION, 1985, 39 (04) : 869 - 877
  • [40] Cancer brings forward oviposition in the fly Drosophila melanogaster
    Arnal, Audrey
    Jacqueline, Camille
    Ujvari, Beata
    Leger, Lucas
    Moreno, Celine
    Faugere, Dominique
    Tasiemski, Aurelie
    Boidin-Wichlacz, Celine
    Misse, Dorothee
    Renaud, Francois
    Montagne, Jacques
    Casali, Andreu
    Roche, Benjamin
    Mery, Frederic
    Thomas, Frederic
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2017, 7 (01): : 272 - 276