Student participation and disadvantage: limitations in policy and practice

被引:31
|
作者
Black, Rosalyn [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Young Australians, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Australian Youth Res Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
citizenship; schooling; social class; youth culture; exclusion; YOUTH PARTICIPATION; VOICE; EDUCATION; POWER; LEADERSHIP; ENGAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1080/13676261.2010.533756
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The public policy of numerous nations, including Australia, articulates a clear expectation that schools will develop young people's capacities to participate in civic society and its democratic structures and processes. A romantic policy rhetoric hides a reality that is both more complex and less well understood than is typically acknowledged. Young people's democratic participation is subject to varying interpretations and implementation, and is employed to serve varying agendas. The role of schools in developing this participation is particularly subject to tensions and contradictions that can work to undermine and constrain the participation of marginalised young people. There is an abundance of research and policy literature on this topic. Yet, within this plethora of prescription and commentary, the key threads that might make a difference are not always clear. Moreover, there is little in this supposedly inclusive agenda that considers its implications for marginalised groups. This article provides a meta-analysis of the current policy and research landscape, examining the dominant discourses and their implications for young people's participation. It focuses particular attention on the position of marginalised young people as it emerges from the literature and outlines an alternative agenda with the potential to challenge an overly complacent policy and practice context.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 474
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Designing grading policy to motivate student participation in online discussion forum
    Zhang, Zuopeng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND LEARNING, 2011, 9 (01) : 1 - 20
  • [32] Disadvantage, inequality, and social policy
    Mechanic, D
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2002, 21 (02) : 48 - 59
  • [33] Disadvantage, capability, commensurability, and policy
    Arneson, Richard J.
    POLITICS PHILOSOPHY & ECONOMICS, 2010, 9 (03) : 339 - 357
  • [34] A Community of Practice among tutors enabling student participation in a seminar preparation
    Nett, Bernhard
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, 2008, 3 (01) : 53 - 67
  • [35] Patients' views on student participation in general practice consultations: A comprehensive review
    Mol, S. S. L.
    Peelen, J. H.
    Kuyvenhoven, M. M.
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2011, 33 (07) : E397 - E400
  • [36] A Community of Practice among tutors enabling student participation in a seminar preparation
    Bernhard Nett
    International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2008, 3 : 53 - 67
  • [37] Sustainable Urban Regeneration Policy Making: Inclusive Participation Practice
    Pontrandolfi, Piergiuseppe
    Scorza, Francesco
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS - ICCSA 2016, PT III, 2016, 9788 : 552 - 560
  • [38] Social work promoting participation: reflections on policy practice in Italy
    Fargion, Silvia
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2018, 21 (04) : 559 - 571
  • [39] Incentives for Research Participation: Policy and Practice From Canadian Corrections
    Matheson, Flora I.
    Forrester, Pamela
    Brazil, Amanda
    Doherty, Sherri
    Affleck, Lindy
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 102 (08) : 1438 - 1442
  • [40] From Policy to Practice: Pupils' Responses to Widening Participation Initiatives
    Baxter, Arthur
    Tate, Jim
    Hatt, Sue
    HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 2007, 61 (03) : 266 - 283