The EORTC QLQ-BN20 for assessment of quality of life in patients receiving treatment or prophylaxis for brain metastases: a literature review

被引:0
|
作者
Leung, Andrew [1 ]
Lien, Karen [1 ]
Zeng, Liang [1 ]
Janet Nguyen [1 ]
Caissie, Amanda [1 ]
Culleton, Shaelyn [1 ]
Holden, Lori [1 ]
Chow, Edward [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program, Dept Radiat Oncol,Odette Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
brain metastases; EORTC QLQ-BN20; quality of life; PHASE-III TRIAL; CRANIAL IRRADIATION; RADIATION ONCOLOGY; SIGNIFICANT OTHERS; CANCER-PATIENTS; RADIOTHERAPY; SYMPTOMS; VALIDATION; THERAPY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1586/ERP.11.66
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Brain metastases occur in approximately 20-40% of cancer patients during the course of disease. As treatment for brain metastases is palliative over curative, quality of life (QoL) is emphasized over prolonged survival. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-BN20 is a QoL assessment specific to brain neoplasms. We aim to provide a review of the current use of the EORTC QLQ-BN20 for patients with brain metastases. Materials & methods: All studies utilizing the QLQ-BN20 for QoL assessment in patients receiving treatments related to brain metastases were included. Study information including treatment type, assessment periods, patient enrolment and all information pertaining to the QLQ-BN20 were extracted. Results: A total of 13 studies were identified, five of which were randomized trials assessing prophylactic whole brain radiation for patients with small-cell lung cancer. The QLQ-BN20 was used in conjunction with the core QLQ-C30 questionnaire in all but one of the studies and together these comprised the entire QoL assessments for 11 of the 13 studies. Neurocognitive function assessments supplemented QoL in four studies and accompanying performance status indices used with the QLQ-BN20 varied. Compliance issues were commonly cited. QoL changes during study periods varied as improvements, deteriorations and stabilizations were all observed. Conclusion: QoL assessments should be conducted using disease-specific tools. Future studies should minimize patient burden in order to maximize data collection and accrual. A common set of QoL end points for patients with brain metastases should be created.
引用
收藏
页码:693 / 700
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of Quality of Life of Lung Cancer Patients Using Eortc QLQ-13 in Pakistan
    Malik, Madeeha
    Nadeem, Nida
    Rafique, Qudsia
    Hussain, Azhar
    Hashmi, Ayisha
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND ALLIED SCIENCES, 2023, 12 (02): : 58 - 63
  • [32] The EORTC QLQ-OH17: A supplementary module to the EORTC QLQ-C30 for assessment of oral health and quality of life in cancer patients
    Hjermstad, Marianne Jensen
    Bergenmar, Mia
    Fisher, Sheila E.
    Montel, Sebastien
    Nicolatou-Galitis, Ourania
    Raber-Durlacher, Judith
    Singer, Susanne
    Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma
    Weis, Joachim
    Yarom, Noam
    Herlofson, Bente B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 (14) : 2203 - 2211
  • [33] Validation of the Polish version of the EORTC QLQ-BM22 module for the assessment of health-related quality of life in patients with bone metastases
    Mirosława Püsküllüoğlu
    Krzysztof A. Tomaszewski
    Andrew Bottomley
    Lori Holden
    Iwona M. Tomaszewska
    Roman Głowacki
    Krzysztof Bereza
    Edward B. Golec
    Edward Chow
    Krzysztof Krzemieniecki
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2014, 23 : 527 - 532
  • [34] Validation of the Polish version of the EORTC QLQ-BM22 module for the assessment of health-related quality of life in patients with bone metastases
    Pueskuellueoglu, Mirosawa
    Tomaszewski, Krzysztof A.
    Bottomley, Andrew
    Holden, Lori
    Tomaszewska, Iwona M.
    Glowacki, Roman
    Bereza, Krzysztof
    Golec, Edward B.
    Chow, Edward
    Krzemieniecki, Krzysztof
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 23 (02) : 527 - 532
  • [35] A longitudinal assessment of quality of life in oral cancer patients using EORTC-QLQ 30 questionnaire
    Palitzika, D.
    Tilaveridis, I.
    Lavdaniti, M.
    Kosintzi, A.
    Antoniadis, K.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 32 : S1276 - S1277
  • [36] A modular questionnaire for the assessment of longterm quality of life in leukaemia patients: The MRC/EORTC QLQ-LEU
    Watson, M
    Zittoun, R
    Hall, E
    Solbu, G
    Wheatley, K
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1996, 5 (01) : 15 - 19
  • [37] Quality of life in brain metastases radiation trials: a literature review
    Wong, J.
    Hird, A.
    Kirou-Mauro, A.
    Napolskikh, J.
    Chow, E.
    [J]. CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2008, 15 (05) : 25 - 45
  • [38] Comparison of the FACT-C, EORTC QLQ-CR38, and QLQ-CR29 quality of life questionnaires for patients with colorectal cancer: a literature review
    Ganesh, Vithusha
    Agarwal, Arnav
    Popovic, Marko
    Cella, David
    McDonald, Rachel
    Vuong, Sherlyn
    Lam, Henry
    Rowbottom, Leigha
    Chan, Stephanie
    Barakat, Tasneem
    DeAngelis, Carlo
    Borean, Michael
    Chow, Edward
    Bottomley, Andrew
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2016, 24 (08) : 3661 - 3668
  • [39] Assessment of Quality of Life of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients by Using the EORTC QLQ-C30
    Ugur, Mehmet Can
    Kutbay, Yasar Bekir
    Kaya, Ozge Ozer
    Ceylan, Cengiz
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 2017, 34 (02) : 197 - 199
  • [40] Comparison of the FACT-C, EORTC QLQ-CR38, and QLQ-CR29 quality of life questionnaires for patients with colorectal cancer: a literature review
    Vithusha Ganesh
    Arnav Agarwal
    Marko Popovic
    David Cella
    Rachel McDonald
    Sherlyn Vuong
    Henry Lam
    Leigha Rowbottom
    Stephanie Chan
    Tasneem Barakat
    Carlo DeAngelis
    Michael Borean
    Edward Chow
    Andrew Bottomley
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016, 24 : 3661 - 3668