Bacteriologic study of diabetic foot ulcer

被引:0
|
作者
Alavi, Seyed Mohammad [1 ,2 ]
Khosravi, Azar D. [2 ,3 ]
Sarami, Abdulah [1 ]
Dashtebozorg, Ahmad [3 ]
Montazeri, Effat Abasi [1 ]
机构
[1] Razi Hosp, Tehran, Iran
[2] Ahwaz Jondishapour Univ Med Sci, Infect & Trop Dis Res Ctr, Ahvaz, Iran
[3] Ahwaz Jondishapour Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Microbiol, Ahvaz, Iran
关键词
diabetic foot; bacteriology; antibiotic resistance; infection;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To study the relative frequency of bacterial. isolates cultured from diabetic foot infections and assess their in vitro susceptibility to the commonly used antibacterial agents. Methodology: In total 32 hospitalized diabetic patients with foot infections were investigated. Deep tissue biopsies were inoculated into freshly prepared Thioglycollate broth medium. Bacterial agents were identified by conventional bacteriologic methods. Sensitivity tests were performed according to standard disc diffusion method of Kirby & Bauer. Results: Clinical grading and bacteriological study of 32 patients with diabetic foot lesions revealed polymicrobial etiology in 16 (50%) and single etiology in 10 (31.2%) and six negative cultures. Aerobic Gram-positive bacteria accounted for 42.9%. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequent microorganism yielded (26.2%), and Staphylococcus epidermidis was regularly associated with the lesions (14.3%). Gram-negative rods accounted for 54.8%. Escherichia coli was the most predominant gram negative organism (23.8%). No anaerobes were isolated from the ulcers. All the microorganisms isolated showed high resistance to used antibiotics, amongst them, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the most resistant bacteria in present study. Conclusion: Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Proteus vulgaris were the most common causes of diabetic foot infections in present study. And the rate of antibiotic resistance was 65% among the isolates. Due to polymicrobial infection and antibiotic resistance, surgical intervention must be concerned.
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 684
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prospective study on microangiopathy in type 2 diabetic foot ulcer
    Fiordaliso, Fabio
    Clerici, Giacomo
    Maggioni, Serena
    Caminiti, Maurizio
    Bisighini, Cinzia
    Novelli, Deborah
    Minnella, Daniela
    Corbelli, Alessandro
    Morisi, Riccardo
    De Iaco, Alberto
    Faglia, Ezio
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2016, 59 (07) : 1542 - 1548
  • [32] Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern in diabetic foot ulcer: A pilot study
    Sekhar, S. M.
    Vyas, N.
    Unnikrishnan, M. K.
    Rodrigues, G. S.
    Mukhopadhyay, C.
    ANNALS OF MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES RESEARCH, 2014, 4 (05) : 742 - 745
  • [33] Prospective study on microangiopathy in type 2 diabetic foot ulcer
    Fabio Fiordaliso
    Giacomo Clerici
    Serena Maggioni
    Maurizio Caminiti
    Cinzia Bisighini
    Deborah Novelli
    Daniela Minnella
    Alessandro Corbelli
    Riccardo Morisi
    Alberto De Iaco
    Ezio Faglia
    Diabetologia, 2016, 59 : 1542 - 1548
  • [34] A Multidisciplinary Team Approach for Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Case Study
    Xu, Beihua
    Song, Xia
    Weng, Yajuan
    ADVANCES IN SKIN & WOUND CARE, 2023, 36 (04) : 6 - 6
  • [35] A prospective study of risk factors for diabetic foot ulcer.
    Boyko, E
    Ahroni, J
    Stensel, V
    Forsberg, R
    Smith, D
    DIABETES, 1996, 45 : 714 - 714
  • [36] A six year prospective study in diabetic foot ulcer patients
    Broncz, A.
    Xu, L.
    Creagh, F. M.
    Selvarajah, D.
    Gandhi, R. A.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2020, 37 : 122 - 123
  • [37] Assessment of foot perfusion in patients with a diabetic foot ulcer
    Forsythe, Rachael O.
    Hinchliffe, Robert J.
    DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2016, 32 : 232 - 238
  • [38] Anhydrous Ointment for Diabetic Foot Ulcer
    Allen, Loyd V., Jr.
    US PHARMACIST, 2018, 43 (10) : 59 - 60
  • [39] Neuropathic ulcer treatment in the diabetic foot
    Lopez Lopez, Daniel
    Fornos Vieitez, Benedicto
    REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE CIENCIAS PODOLOGICAS, 2008, 2 (02): : 19 - 23