Weighting models and weighting factors Reply

被引:17
|
作者
Vosgerau, Gottfried [1 ]
Synofzik, Matthis [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dusseldorf, Inst Philosophie, Dept Philosophy, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Univ Tubingen, Hertie Inst Clin Brain Res, Dept Neurodegenerat Dis, D-72074 Tubingen, Germany
[3] German Res Ctr Neurodegenerat Dis, Tubingen, Germany
关键词
Agency; Comparator model; Schizophrenia; Optimal cue integration; Bayesian cue integration; Multifactorial weighting model; SENSORY CONSEQUENCES; SCHIZOPHRENIA; AGENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.concog.2011.09.016
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We defend our multifactorial weighting model of the sense of agency and our critique of the comparator model (Synofzik, Vosgerau, & Newen, 2008) against the critiques that have been brought forward by Carruthers (2012) and Wong (2012). Building on the specification of our model that emerges from this response, we will suggest a distinct mechanism how weighting of different agency factors might work: internal and external agency cues are constantly weighted according to their reliability in a given situation. Thus, the weighting process underlying the sense of agency might follow the principles of optimal cue integration. We review recent empirical evidence for this hypothesis, demonstrating that the multifactorial weighting model is not only testable, but has in fact already received first empirical support. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 58
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Simple models for RPC weighting fields and potentials
    Schnizer, B
    Heubrandtner, T
    Schweitzer, G
    [J]. NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2004, 535 (1-2): : 554 - 557
  • [32] Weighting the coefficients in PARADISE models to increase their generalizability
    Engelbrecht, Klaus-Peter
    Kuehnel, Christine
    Moeller, Sebastian
    [J]. PERCEPTION IN MULTIMODAL DIALOGUE SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5078 : 289 - 292
  • [33] No weighting
    Smith, S
    [J]. FORTUNE, 2003, 147 (05) : 30 - 30
  • [34] Weighting for unequal selection probabilities in multilevel models
    Pfeffermann, D
    Skinner, CJ
    Holmes, DJ
    Goldstein, H
    Rasbash, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1998, 60 : 23 - 40
  • [35] In defence of weighting: a reply to Robert van der Veen
    Miller, David
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL AND POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY, 2010, 13 (04) : 561 - 566
  • [36] RANDOM WEIGHTING APPROXIMATION IN LINEAR REGRESSION MODELS
    石坚
    [J]. Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica, 1996, (02) : 137 - 143
  • [37] Weighting observations in the context of calibrating groundwater models
    Hill, MC
    Tiedeman, CR
    [J]. CALIBRATION AND RELIABILITY IN GROUNDWATER MODELLING: A FEW STEPS CLOSER TO REALITY, 2003, (277): : 196 - 203
  • [38] Weighting hidden Markov models for maximum discrimination
    Karchin, R
    Hughey, R
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 1998, 14 (09) : 772 - 782
  • [39] Extending weighting models with a term quality measure
    Lioma, Christina
    Ounis, Ladh
    [J]. STRING PROCESSING AND INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4726 : 205 - 216
  • [40] Comparing weighting models for monolingual information retrieval
    Amati, G
    Carpineto, C
    Romano, G
    [J]. COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MULTILINGUAL INFORMATION ACCESS SYSTEMS, 2003, 3237 : 310 - 318