Thus Conscience: Synderesis and the Destructuring of Conscience in Reformation England

被引:2
|
作者
Stoll, Abraham [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ San Diego, San Diego, CA 92110 USA
关键词
conscience; Hamlet; Luther; Perkins; Shakespeare; synderesis;
D O I
10.1179/1041257311Z.0000000005
中图分类号
I [文学]; K [历史、地理];
学科分类号
05 ; 06 ;
摘要
Shakespeare regularly puts conscience on stage, exemplifying a tendency in early modern England to present the faculty as a dynamic experience unfolding in real time. Shakespeare has a theological counterpart in William Perkins, who theorizes conscience as an inward process of self-reflection, and as an important but deeply inchoate faculty. This essay shows how this self-reflective conscience emerges in theology through a process of destructuring. Beginning with the highly structured conceptions of the scholastics, particularly Aquinas, it moves to the innovations of Luther, and then Perkins. Tracing the disappearance of the scholastic notion of synderesis, it reveals a Protestant conscience shaped by an ongoing impetus to turn away from structure, toward more imperfect forms.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 77
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ON CONSCIENCE
    MCGUIRE, MC
    JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 1963, 60 (10): : 253 - 263
  • [42] CONSCIENCE, EQUITY AND THE COURT OF CHANCERY IN EARLY MODERN ENGLAND
    Williams, Ian
    EDINBURGH LAW REVIEW, 2011, 15 (03) : 500 - 502
  • [43] 'Conscience'
    Wormser, B
    SOUTH DAKOTA REVIEW, 2001, 39 (02): : 127 - 128
  • [44] 'CONSCIENCE'
    FROST, C
    TRIQUARTERLY, 1996, (96): : 201 - 201
  • [45] Conscience
    de Vries, Peter
    CULTURAL STUDIES-CRITICAL METHODOLOGIES, 2014, 14 (06): : 606 - 609
  • [46] CONSCIENCE
    DARCY, E
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 1977, 3 (02) : 98 - 99
  • [47] CONSCIENCE
    Dixler, Elsa
    NEW YORK TIMES BOOK REVIEW, 2018, 123 (37): : 21 - 21
  • [48] Conscience
    Izod, Karen
    AGENDA, 2014, 48 (3-4): : 158 - 158
  • [49] 'CONSCIENCE'
    DEAN, R
    PARTISAN REVIEW, 1978, 45 (03): : 433 - 433
  • [50] The Conscience
    Adair-Toteff, Christopher
    THEOLOGICAL STUDIES, 2016, 77 (03) : 777 - 778