FDI TO EU15 AND NEW MEMBER STATES: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INFLOW DETERMINANTS

被引:3
|
作者
Igosina, Viktorija [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Econ Prague, Fac Int Relat Int Trade, Prague, Czech Republic
来源
PRAGUE ECONOMIC PAPERS | 2015年 / 24卷 / 03期
关键词
foreign direct investment; EU integration; gravity based modelling; panel data; fixed effect; random effect; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; PANEL DATA; TRADE;
D O I
10.18267/j.pep.518
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Wide range of academic studies and economic practice are showing strong correlation between GDP growth and FDI flows. Moreover, there is a number of cases when FDI inflows were positively impacting economic development. That provides grounds and needs for profound research in the area of investment determinants. The main objective of this paper is to classify FDI determinants in the EU countries. All assuming that there are differences between the two groups - old and new member states. The econonnetrical approach of gravity modelling was chosen as the most appropriate methodology to analyse panel data set. Panel is depicting FDI flows coming from the external non-EU investors and does not include intra EU investment flows among the member countries (firstly due to the relative insignificance of the intra-EU flows compared to the outer inflow values and secondly due to the need to answer what exactly leads non-European investor to opt for the EU country A and not B). The random effect model has proved diversity in FDI flows determinants. Study outcomes support the need for policymakers' attention in the EU investment policy harmonization, towards market equalization that would improve competiveness of the whole EU region.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 273
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] WHAT IS THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FDI AND ECONOMIC GROWTH? EVIDENCE FROM EU15 COUNTRIES
    Bilas, Vlatka
    [J]. ZBORNIK VELEUCILISTA U RIJECI-JOURNAL OF THE POLYTECHNICS OF RIJEKA, 2020, 8 (01): : 253 - 281
  • [22] The Quality of Governance and Its Impact on FDI Inflows. A Comparative Study of EU Member States
    Dobrowolska, Boguslawa
    Dorozynski, Tomasz
    Kuna-Marszalek, Anetta
    [J]. COMPARATIVE ECONOMIC RESEARCH-CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE, 2023, 26 (03): : 7 - 30
  • [23] A Comparative Analysis of the Public Spending Efficiency of the New EU Member States: A DEA Approach
    Baciu, Livia
    Botezat, Alina
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2014, 50 : 31 - 46
  • [24] Farm Productivity and Profitability: A Comparative Analysis of Selected New and Existing EU Member States
    Sophia Davidova
    Matthew Gorton
    Tomas Ratinger
    Katarzyna Zawalinska
    Belen Iraizoz
    [J]. Comparative Economic Studies, 2005, 47 (4) : 652 - 674
  • [25] Farm Productivity and Profitability: A Comparative Analysis of Selected New and Existing EU Member States
    Davidova, Sophia
    Gorton, Matthew
    Ratinger, Tomas
    Zawalinska, Katarzyna
    Iraizoz, Belen
    [J]. COMPARATIVE ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2005, 47 (04) : 652 - 674
  • [26] An innovative perspective on the impact of innovation on global competitiveness: Comparative analysis of EU13 and EU15 countries
    Cetin, Melike
    Erkisi, Kemal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPETITIVENESS, 2023, 15 (04) : 19 - 35
  • [27] Determinants of undeclared work in the EU Member States
    Popescu, Madalina Ecaterina
    Cristescu, Amalia
    Stanila, Larisa
    Vasilescu, Maria Denisa
    [J]. 3RD GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS, ECONOMICS, MANAGEMENT AND TOURISM, 2016, 39 : 520 - 525
  • [28] Sustainable Real Exchange Rates in the New EU Member States: Is FDI a Mixed Blessing?
    Babecky, Jan
    Bulir, Ales
    Smidkova, Katerina
    [J]. FIVE YEARS OF AN ENLARGED EU: A POSITIVE SUM GAME, 2010, : 153 - +
  • [29] FDI and Intra-industry Trade in the Automotive Industry in the New EU Member States
    Ambroziak, Lukasz
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2016, 52 (01) : 23 - 42
  • [30] Welfare and Higher Education in EU Member States - Comparative Analysis
    Wronowska, Gabriela
    [J]. OECONOMIA COPERNICANA, 2015, 6 (01) : 33 - 45