Measuring Interpretability for Different Types of Machine Learning Models

被引:6
|
作者
Zhou, Qing [1 ]
Liao, Fenglu [1 ]
Mou, Chao [1 ]
Wang, Ping [2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Coll Comp Sci, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, Sch Foreign Languages & Cultures, Chongqing, Peoples R China
关键词
Structural complexity; Model interpretability; Interpretability evaluation model; Machine learning models; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-04503-6_29
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The interpretability of a machine learning model plays a significant role in practical applications, thus it is necessary to develop a method to compare the interpretability for different models so as to select the most appropriate one. However, model interpretability, a highly subjective concept, is difficult to be accurately measured, not to mention the interpretability comparison of different models. To this end, we develop an interpretability evaluation model to compute model interpretability and compare interpretability for different models. Specifically, first we we present a general form of model interpretability. Second, a questionnaire survey system is developed to collect information about users' understanding of a machine learning model. Next, three structure features are selected to investigate the relationship between interpretability and structural complexity. After this, an interpretability label is build based on the questionnaire survey result and a linear regression model is developed to evaluate the relationship between the structural features and model interpretability. The experiment results demonstrate that our interpretability evaluation model is valid and reliable to evaluate the interpretability of different models.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 308
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learning
    Gilpin, Leilani H.
    Bau, David
    Yuan, Ben Z.
    Bajwa, Ayesha
    Specter, Michael
    Kagal, Lalana
    [J]. 2018 IEEE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA SCIENCE AND ADVANCED ANALYTICS (DSAA), 2018, : 80 - 89
  • [42] Interpreting Interpretability: Understanding Data Scientists' Use of Interpretability Tools for Machine Learning
    Kaur, Harmanpreet
    Nori, Harsha
    Jenkins, Samuel
    Caruana, Rich
    Wallach, Hanna
    Vaughan, Jennifer Wortman
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI'20), 2020,
  • [43] Comparing the Predictive Performance, Interpretability, and Accessibility of Machine Learning and Physically Based Models for Water Treatment
    Dunnington, Dewey W.
    Trueman, Benjamin F.
    Raseman, William J.
    Anderson, Lindsay E.
    Gagnon, Graham A.
    [J]. ACS ES&T ENGINEERING, 2021, 1 (03): : 348 - 356
  • [44] Different learning predictors and their effects for Moodle Machine Learning models
    Bognar, Laszlo
    Fauszt, Tibor
    [J]. 2020 11TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE INFOCOMMUNICATIONS (COGINFOCOM 2020), 2020, : 405 - 409
  • [45] Exploring Insights in Biomass and Waste Gasification via Ensemble Machine Learning Models and Interpretability Techniques
    Bongomin, Ocident
    Nzila, Charles
    Mwasiagi, Josphat Igadwa
    Maube, Obadiah
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2024, 2024
  • [46] Machine learning of cloud types in satellite observations and climate models
    Kuma, Peter
    Bender, Frida A. -M.
    Schuddeboom, Alex
    McDonald, Adrian J.
    Seland, Oyvind
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2023, 23 (01) : 523 - 549
  • [47] Visual interpretability of bioimaging deep learning models
    Rotem, Oded
    Zaritsky, Assaf
    [J]. NATURE METHODS, 2024, 21 (08) : 1394 - 1397
  • [48] Interpretability of Deep Learning Models: A Survey of Results
    Chakraborty, Supriyo
    Tomsett, Richard
    Raghavendra, Ramya
    Harborne, Daniel
    Alzantot, Moustafa
    Cerutti, Federico
    Srivastava, Mani
    Preece, Alun
    Julier, Simon
    Rao, Raghuveer M.
    Kelley, Troy D.
    Braines, Dave
    Sensoy, Murat
    Willis, Christopher J.
    Gurram, Prudhvi
    [J]. 2017 IEEE SMARTWORLD, UBIQUITOUS INTELLIGENCE & COMPUTING, ADVANCED & TRUSTED COMPUTED, SCALABLE COMPUTING & COMMUNICATIONS, CLOUD & BIG DATA COMPUTING, INTERNET OF PEOPLE AND SMART CITY INNOVATION (SMARTWORLD/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCOM/IOP/SCI), 2017,
  • [49] Applications of interpretability in deep learning models for ophthalmology
    Hanif, Adam M.
    Beqiri, Sara
    Keane, Pearse A.
    Campbell, J. Peter
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 32 (05) : 452 - 458
  • [50] ON THE STABILITY OF MACHINE LEARNING MODELS: MEASURING MODEL AND OUTCOME VARIANCE
    Dhar, Vasant
    Yu, Haoyuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, 2020, 18 (02): : 9 - 22