Agricultural Innovation: A comparative analysis of economic benefits gained by farmers under climate resilient and conventional agricultural practices

被引:9
|
作者
Jamil, Ihsan [1 ]
Jun, Wen [1 ]
Mughal, Bushra [2 ]
Waheed, Junaid [1 ]
Hussain, Hadi [1 ]
Waseem, Muhammad [3 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Econ & Finance, Xian, Peoples R China
[2] Khawaja Fareed Univ Engn & Informat Technol, Sch Comp Sci & Informat Technol, Punjab, Pakistan
[3] Huazhong Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Wuhan, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Climate resilient agriculture (CRA); Agricultural innovation; Crop management; Soil and water management; Soil quality; Technical training; Conventional agriculture; Cotton; Sustainable land and water management practices (SL& W); INDO-GANGETIC PLAINS; ECONOMETRIC-ANALYSIS; COTTON CULTIVATION; SMART AGRICULTURE; USE EFFICIENCY; FOOD SECURITY; WHEAT; PRODUCTIVITY; IRRIGATION; ADAPTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105581
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Cotton producers in Pakistan must manage many concerns, for example, climate change, traditional agricultural management practices and depletion of land resources i.e. land, and water have resulted in low productivity and pose the largest challenge ever to the sustainability of cotton production in Pakistan. Sustainable land and water (SL&W) management practices of climate resilient agriculture (CRA) such as irrigation (laser land levelling, bed sowing, and drainage management), soil (minimum tillage), and crop (flood and drought tolerant varieties) management practices are recognized as the most efficient and sustainable, particularly for growing cotton. Using cross-sectional data from cotton-growing districts of Punjab, this study attempted to estimate and compare the economic benefits of SL&W management practices of CRA and conventional agricultural practices. The study also estimated the impact of technical training, SL&W management practices of CRA and changing soil quality to improve cotton productivity and sustainability in Punjab, Pakistan. The economic analysis showed that the adopters of CRA have significantly higher economic benefits from one hectare of cotton compared with nonadopters. The economic benefits of adopters significantly increased after implementing SL&W management practices of CRA. Additionally, this study also explores the SL&W management practices; technical training regarding SL&W management practices of CRA; access to credit; varying soil quality; and other inputs lead to significant variation in cotton productivity. The most important implications are that cotton farmers improved productivity through the SL&W management practices of CRA. Hence, proved that CRA are economically, financially, and environmentally, desirable. The findings of the study in a nutshell also reveal that CRA have an absolute advantage over traditional cotton farming.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does the Adoption of Climate-Smart Agricultural Practices Impact Farmers' Income? Evidence from Ghana
    Agbenyo, Wonder
    Jiang, Yuansheng
    Jia, Xinxin
    Wang, Jingyi
    Ntim-Amo, Gideon
    Dunya, Rahman
    Siaw, Anthony
    Asare, Isaac
    Twumasi, Martinson Ankrah
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (07)
  • [42] Effects of ecological and conventional agricultural intensification practices on maize yields in sub-Saharan Africa under potential climate change
    Folberth, Christian
    Yang, Hong
    Gaiser, Thomas
    Liu, Junguo
    Wang, Xiuying
    Williams, Jimmy
    Schulin, Rainer
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2014, 9 (04):
  • [43] Quantifying the impact of climate smart agricultural practices on soil carbon storage relative to conventional management
    Schreiner-McGraw, Adam P.
    Ransom, Curtis J.
    Veum, Kristen S.
    Wood, Jeffrey D.
    Sudduth, Kenneth A.
    Abendroth, Lori J.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2024, 344
  • [44] Determinants of adoption of climate smart agricultural practices among farmers in Bale-Eco region, Ethiopia
    Negera, Mebratu
    Alemu, Tekie
    Hagos, Fitsum
    Haileslassie, Amare
    [J]. HELIYON, 2022, 8 (07)
  • [45] Trade-offs, synergies and acceptability of climate smart agricultural practices by smallholder farmers in rural Ghana
    Antwi-Agyei, Philip
    Atta-Aidoo, Jonathan
    Asare-Nuamah, Peter
    Stringer, Lindsay C.
    Antwi, Kwabena
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [46] Using participatory videos in understanding farmers experiences with climate smart agricultural practices: reflections from Ghana
    Kwapong, Nana Afranaa
    Whitfield, Stephen
    Ambuko, Jane
    Ankrah, Daniel Adu
    Swanepoel, Frans
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2024, 7
  • [47] Uptake of climate-smart agricultural practices among smallholder sorghum farmers in Busia County, Kenya
    Atsiaya, Godfrey Obwina
    Gido, Eric Obedy
    Sibiko, Kenneth Waluse
    [J]. COGENT FOOD & AGRICULTURE, 2023, 9 (01):
  • [48] Determinants of awareness levels of climate smart agricultural technologies and practices of urban farmers in Kuje, Abuja, Nigeria
    Mashi, Sani Abubakar
    Inkani, Amina Ibrahim
    Obaro, Dominic Oghenejeabor
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2022, 70
  • [49] Climate-smart agricultural practices: a case of dairy cooperative farmers in Agula and Maychew, Northern Ethiopia
    Balcha, Endale
    Menghistu, Habtamu Taddele
    Zenebe, Amanuel
    Teferi, Tadesse
    Hadush, Birhanu
    [J]. CARBON MANAGEMENT, 2023, 14 (01)
  • [50] Assessing the contribution of climate-smart agricultural practices to the resilience of maize farmers in Bungoma County, Kenya
    Siminyu, Philip
    Oluoch-Kosura, Willis
    de Groote, Hugo
    Mbau, Judith Syombua
    [J]. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS-AFJARE, 2021, 16 (02): : 126 - 139