The emergency department and managed care: A synergistic model

被引:1
|
作者
Fisher, BA [1 ]
机构
[1] Loma Linda Univ, Med Ctr, Loma Linda, CA 92354 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00115514-199807000-00009
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Managed care organizations (MCOs) have recently focused on the high cost of patient visits to the emergency department (ED). MCOs emphasize preventing the access low-acuity patients have to the ED, believing that billions of healthcare dollars will be saved. A review of ED studies, however, suggests a different outcome. Combined with new ED service lines, perhaps another-rather paradoxical-approach to managing healthcare costs in the ED is more patient focused and more cost effective in the long term. This approach is more comprehensive and offers more, rather than fewer, services. The ED is an important community resource and entry port to healthcare. It is the only place open 24 hours per day, seven days per week, with no appointment necessary and all lab and radiology services available. The very claim that it is overutilized is an indication of its success. In large-volume EDs, certain patient populations may be more specifically served with pediatric emergency, industrial medicine, and fast-trade physicians. Special facilities for chest pain patients or for observation enable physicians to treat patients more quickly and to keep them out of hospital beds, thus lowering costs. In smaller hospitals, the well-rounded ED physician can treat patients of all acuities. In the most rural communities, the ED can become the local 24-hour clinic with short-term stay beds. EDs are fixed costs to hospitals. Extracting low-acuity patients from the ED will raise costs for emergency patients and leave the facility underutilized. By appropriately raising prices for emergencies and decreasing low-acuity patient charges to reflect their marginal expense, hospitals can make the ED a cost-friendly environment for the low-acuity patient.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 355
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Frequency and Cost of Emergency Department Visits among Migraineurs in a US Managed Care Population
    Golden, Wendy
    Christensen, Laura
    Hu, X. Henry
    Bigal, Marcelo
    Chen, Ya-Ting
    Ng-Mak, Daisy
    NEUROLOGY, 2011, 76 (09) : A36 - A36
  • [32] Patients from care homes who attend the emergency department: could they be managed differently
    Carter, L.
    Skinner, J.
    Robinson, S.
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2009, 26 (04) : 259 - 262
  • [33] Many Emergency Department Visits Could Be Managed At Urgent Care Centers And Retail Clinics
    Weinick, Robin M.
    Burns, Rachel M.
    Mehrotra, Ateev
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2010, 29 (09) : 1630 - 1636
  • [34] Medicaid Managed Care in Florida and Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Preventable Emergency Department Visits
    Hu, Tianyan
    Mortensen, Karoline
    Chen, Jie
    MEDICAL CARE, 2018, 56 (06) : 477 - 483
  • [35] Managed care ethics: An emergency?
    Larkin, GL
    Adams, JG
    Derse, AR
    Iserson, KV
    Gotthold, WE
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1996, 28 (06) : 683 - 689
  • [36] Effect of an emergency department (ED) managed acute care unit on ED overcrowding and emergency medical services diversion
    Kelen, GD
    Scheulen, JJ
    Hill, PM
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 8 (11) : 1095 - 1100
  • [37] Impact of mailing information about nonurgent care on emergency department visits by Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled in managed care
    Rector, TS
    Venus, PJ
    Laine, AJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 1999, 5 (12): : 1505 - 1512
  • [38] Risk factors for emergency department use among children with asthma using primary care in a managed care environment
    Lafata, JE
    Xi, HG
    Divine, G
    AMBULATORY PEDIATRICS, 2002, 2 (04) : 268 - 275
  • [39] Emergency care and managed care - A dangerous combination
    Hoffmann, DE
    WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW, 1997, 72 (02) : 315 - 407
  • [40] The influence of enrollment in Medicaid managed care versus fee-for-service on emergency department utilization
    Dombkowski, KJ
    Clark, SJ
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2002, 51 (04) : 214A - 214A