Measuring the impact of new technology: An outcomes-based approach

被引:13
|
作者
Sachdeva, RC
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Crit Care Sect, Dept Pediat, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
[2] Med Coll Wisconsin, Crit Care Sect, Dept Epidemiol, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
[3] Childrens Hosp Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
关键词
technology; technology assessment; technology evaluation; outcomes; value assessment; investment models; capital decision-making; information technology;
D O I
10.1097/00003246-200108001-00008
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
In the current era of decreasing resources, many healthcare organizations are under increasing pressure to evaluate new technology. Advances and innovations in healthcare technology are instrumental in reshaping the healthcare system and in impacting the practice of medicine, including critical care. Healthcare organizations are faced with the following four questions related to adopting a new technology: 1) Should the organization invest in this technology? 2) What are the associated benefits and risks of the capital investment? 3) What is the impact on patient outcomes as a result of adopting the technology? 4) What is the return on investment to the organization? These issues represent challenging areas for the researcher, clinician, manager, and policy maker. New techniques from the business and outcomes research arenas allow for the development of quantitative and qualitative models to facilitate answering these questions. By integrating business and clinical considerations, these models can impact policy at two levels: 1) by identifying optimal capital expenditure decisions for individual healthcare organizations, it can provide a significant competitive advantage for an organization; and 2) by identifying optimal health policies related to technology at a national and international health level, it can impact the healthcare systems and patient outcomes in a favorable manner.
引用
收藏
页码:N190 / N195
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validity in outcomes-based assessment
    Killen, R
    PERSPECTIVES IN EDUCATION, 2003, 21 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [22] Outcomes-based approach to quality assessment and curriculum improvement in higher education
    Tam, Maureen
    QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION, 2014, 22 (02) : 158 - +
  • [23] Gamified Outcomes-Based Teaching and Learning Assessment Tool for Mapuia Institute of Technology
    Yumang, Analyn N.
    Paglinawan, Arnold C.
    Avendano, Glenn O.
    Paglinawan, Charmaine C.
    Sejera, Marianne M.
    Aquino, Nicole Joyce J.
    Garvida, Alelil Joy C.
    Datu, Reuvin Jireh L.
    2016 6TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL SYSTEM, COMPUTING AND ENGINEERING (ICCSCE), 2016, : 380 - 385
  • [24] Outcomes-based aesthetics? Reflections over aesthetic communication and outcomes-based learning based on a study of six syllabi
    Thorgersen, Ketil
    ENGLISH TEACHING-PRACTICE AND CRITIQUE, 2014, 13 (02): : 19 - 34
  • [25] Moving towards outcomes-based CPD
    不详
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2016, 179 (21) : 535 - 535
  • [26] An outcomes-based approach to decisions about drug coverage policies in British Columbia
    Morgan, S
    Bassett, K
    Mintzes, B
    PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2004, 55 (11) : 1230 - 1232
  • [27] Exploring in Teaching Mode of "Optical Fiber Sensing Technology" Outcomes-based Education (OBE)
    Fu, Guangwei
    Fu, Xinghu
    Zhang, Baojun
    Bi, Weihong
    14TH CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND TRAINING IN OPTICS AND PHOTONICS (ETOP 2017), 2017, 10452
  • [28] The Impact of the Transition to Outcomes-Based Teaching on University Preparedness in Mathematics in South Africa
    Engelbrecht, Johann
    Harding, Ansie
    MATHEMATICS EDUCATION RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2008, 20 (02) : 57 - 70
  • [29] Outcomes-based assessment in instrumentation and measurement
    Grodzicki, G. P.
    Madigan, P. Q.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2011, 48 (04) : 451 - 462
  • [30] Making the transition to outcomes-based instruction
    Hartel, RW
    JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 2004, 69 (03) : R96 - R97