Single versus double row suture anchor fixation for greater tuberosity fractures - a biomechanical study

被引:13
|
作者
Seppel, Gernot [1 ,2 ]
Saier, Tim [1 ,3 ]
Martetschlaeger, Frank [1 ,4 ]
Plath, Johannes E. [1 ,5 ]
Guevara-Alvarez, Alberto [1 ]
Henschel, Julia [6 ]
Winkler, Martin [6 ]
Augat, Peter [6 ,7 ]
Imhoff, Andreas B. [1 ]
Buchmann, Stefan [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Dept Orthoped Sports Med, Ismaninger Str 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] Krankenhaus Barmherzige Bruder, Dept Orthoped & Trauma Surg, Munich, Germany
[3] Berufsgenossenschaftl Unfallklin Murnau, Dept Reconstruct Joint Surg & Sportstraumatol, Murnau, Germany
[4] ATOS Clin Munich, Ctr Shoulder & Elbow Surg, Munich, Germany
[5] Klinikum Augsburg, Dept Trauma Surg, Augsburg, Germany
[6] Berufsgenossenschaftl Unfallklin Murnau, Inst Biomech, Murnau, Germany
[7] Paracelsus Med Univ, Inst Biomech, Salzburg, Austria
[8] Orthopad Fachzentrum, Weilheim, Germany
来源
关键词
Greater tuberosity fracture; Suture anchor; Arthroscopic; Double row fixation; Single-row; ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR; INTERNAL-FIXATION; PROXIMAL HUMERUS; INFRASPINATUS TENDONS; DISPLACED FRACTURES; OPEN REDUCTION; SUPRASPINATUS; MORPHOLOGY; INSERTION; 2-PART;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-017-1868-7
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Fractures of the humeral greater tuberosity (GT) are a frequent injury progressively treated with arthroscopic suture anchor repair. Yet, no biomechanical study has been performed comparing fixation strength of arthroscopic single- (SR) vs. double row (DR) fixation. Methods: Standardized fractures of the greater tuberosity were created in 12 fresh frozen proximal humeri. After random assignation to the SR or DR group the fixed humeri were tested applying cyclic loading to the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendon. Load to failure and fragment displacement were assessed by means of an electrodynamic material testing machine using an optical tracking system. Results: Load to failure values were higher in the DR group (649 N; +/- 176) than in the SR group (490 N; +/- 145) however without statistical significance (p = .12). In greater tuberosity displacement of 3-5 mm surgical treatment is recommended. The fixing constructs in this study did not reach displacement landmarks of 3 or 5 mm before construct failure as shown in previous studies. Thus the applied traction force (N) at 1 mm displacement was analyzed. In the SR group the load at 1 mm displacement was 277 N; +/- 46 compared to 260 N; +/- 62 in the DR group (p = .65). Conclusion: The results suggest that both techniques are viable options for refixation of greater tuberosity fractures.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair
    Mazzocca, AD
    Millett, PJ
    Guanche, CA
    Santangelo, SA
    Arciero, RA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (12): : 1861 - 1868
  • [22] Does the Literature Support Double-Row Suture Anchor Fixation for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair? A Systematic Review Comparing Double-Row and Single-Row Suture Anchor Configuration
    Nho, Shane J.
    Slabaugh, Mark A.
    Seroyer, Shane T.
    Grumet, Robert C.
    Wilson, Joseph B.
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    Romeo, Anthony A.
    Bach, Bernard R., Jr.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2009, 25 (11): : 1319 - 1328
  • [23] Comparison between arthroscopic suture anchor fixation and open plate fixation in the greater tuberosity fracture of the proximal humerus
    Kim, Young-Jun
    Ji, Jong-Hun
    Park, Sang-Eun
    Parikh, Darshil
    Lee, Woo-Jin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2024, 34 (01): : 621 - 631
  • [24] Comparison between arthroscopic suture anchor fixation and open plate fixation in the greater tuberosity fracture of the proximal humerus
    Young-Jun Kim
    Jong-Hun Ji
    Sang-Eun Park
    Darshil Parikh
    Woo-Jin Lee
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2024, 34 (1) : 621 - 631
  • [25] Arthroscopic Fixation for Tibial Eminence Fractures: Comparison of Double-Row and Transosseous Anchor Knot Fixation Techniques with Suture Anchors
    Li, Ji
    Liu, Chunhui
    Li, Zhongli
    Fu, Yangmu
    Yang, Yimeng
    Zhang, Qiang
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2018, 24 : 7348 - 7356
  • [26] Arthroscopic Suture Bridge Anchor Repair of Comminuted Greater Tuberosity Fracture With Double-Row Biceps Tenodesis in Elderly Osteoporotic Patients
    El Rassi, Georges
    Aouad, Dany
    Ayoubi, Rami
    Darwish, Mohammad
    Saidy, Elias
    Maalouly, Joseph
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2021, 10 (01): : E139 - E144
  • [27] Suture Anchor Fixation for Fifth Metatarsal Tuberosity Avulsion Fractures: A Case Series and Review of Literature
    Hong, Choon Chiet
    Nag, Kushal
    Yeow, Huifen
    Lin, Adrian Zhigao
    Tan, Ken Jin
    JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2018, 57 (05): : 1030 - 1033
  • [28] Quadriceps Tendon Repair Using Double-Row Suture Anchor Fixation
    Tramer, Joseph S.
    Evans, Hardy
    Ziedas, Alexander C.
    Swantek, Alexander J.
    Jordan, Steven E.
    Makhni, Eric C.
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2021, 10 (10): : E2337 - E2342
  • [29] Use of electrocautery devices for suture passage through the greater tuberosity: a biomechanical study
    Staggers, Jackson R.
    Chong, Alexander C. M.
    Piatt, Bruce E.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2023, 32 (03) : 512 - 518
  • [30] Arthroscopic reduction and fixation with suture-bridge technique for displaced or comminuted greater tuberosity fractures
    Song, Hyun Seok
    Williams, Gerald R., Jr.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2008, 24 (08): : 956 - 960