Single versus double row suture anchor fixation for greater tuberosity fractures - a biomechanical study

被引:13
|
作者
Seppel, Gernot [1 ,2 ]
Saier, Tim [1 ,3 ]
Martetschlaeger, Frank [1 ,4 ]
Plath, Johannes E. [1 ,5 ]
Guevara-Alvarez, Alberto [1 ]
Henschel, Julia [6 ]
Winkler, Martin [6 ]
Augat, Peter [6 ,7 ]
Imhoff, Andreas B. [1 ]
Buchmann, Stefan [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Dept Orthoped Sports Med, Ismaninger Str 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] Krankenhaus Barmherzige Bruder, Dept Orthoped & Trauma Surg, Munich, Germany
[3] Berufsgenossenschaftl Unfallklin Murnau, Dept Reconstruct Joint Surg & Sportstraumatol, Murnau, Germany
[4] ATOS Clin Munich, Ctr Shoulder & Elbow Surg, Munich, Germany
[5] Klinikum Augsburg, Dept Trauma Surg, Augsburg, Germany
[6] Berufsgenossenschaftl Unfallklin Murnau, Inst Biomech, Murnau, Germany
[7] Paracelsus Med Univ, Inst Biomech, Salzburg, Austria
[8] Orthopad Fachzentrum, Weilheim, Germany
来源
关键词
Greater tuberosity fracture; Suture anchor; Arthroscopic; Double row fixation; Single-row; ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR; INTERNAL-FIXATION; PROXIMAL HUMERUS; INFRASPINATUS TENDONS; DISPLACED FRACTURES; OPEN REDUCTION; SUPRASPINATUS; MORPHOLOGY; INSERTION; 2-PART;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-017-1868-7
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Fractures of the humeral greater tuberosity (GT) are a frequent injury progressively treated with arthroscopic suture anchor repair. Yet, no biomechanical study has been performed comparing fixation strength of arthroscopic single- (SR) vs. double row (DR) fixation. Methods: Standardized fractures of the greater tuberosity were created in 12 fresh frozen proximal humeri. After random assignation to the SR or DR group the fixed humeri were tested applying cyclic loading to the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendon. Load to failure and fragment displacement were assessed by means of an electrodynamic material testing machine using an optical tracking system. Results: Load to failure values were higher in the DR group (649 N; +/- 176) than in the SR group (490 N; +/- 145) however without statistical significance (p = .12). In greater tuberosity displacement of 3-5 mm surgical treatment is recommended. The fixing constructs in this study did not reach displacement landmarks of 3 or 5 mm before construct failure as shown in previous studies. Thus the applied traction force (N) at 1 mm displacement was analyzed. In the SR group the load at 1 mm displacement was 277 N; +/- 46 compared to 260 N; +/- 62 in the DR group (p = .65). Conclusion: The results suggest that both techniques are viable options for refixation of greater tuberosity fractures.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Single versus double row suture anchor fixation for greater tuberosity fractures – a biomechanical study
    Gernot Seppel
    Tim Saier
    Frank Martetschläger
    Johannes E. Plath
    Alberto Guevara-Alvarez
    Julia Henschel
    Martin Winkler
    Peter Augat
    Andreas B. Imhoff
    Stefan Buchmann
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 18
  • [2] Suture anchor versus screw fixation for greater tuberosity fractures of the humerusua biomechanical study
    Lin, Cheng-Li
    Hong, Chih-Kai
    Jou, I-Ming
    Lin, Chii-Jeng
    Su, Fong-Chin
    Su, Wei-Ren
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2012, 30 (03) : 423 - 428
  • [3] Arthroscopic double-row suture anchor fixation of minimally displaced greater tuberosity fractures
    Ji, Jong-Hun
    Kim, Weon-Yoo
    Ra, Ki-Hang
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2007, 23 (10): : 1133.e1 - 1133.e4
  • [4] Fractures of the greater and lesser tuberosity of the humerus. Suture anchor fixation
    Lorenz, S.
    Lenich, A.
    ARTHROSKOPIE, 2012, 25 (02) : 134 - 138
  • [5] Suture Anchor Fixation of Bony Bankart Fractures: A Comparison of Single Row versus Suture Bridge Techniques
    Puskas, Gabor J.
    Giles, Joshua W.
    Welsh, Mark F.
    Johnson, James A.
    Athwal, George
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2013, 143 : 7S - 7S
  • [6] Different suture anchor fixation techniques affect contact properties in humeral greater tuberosity fracture: a biomechanical study
    Lin, Cheng-Li
    Yeh, Ming-Long
    Su, Fong-Chin
    Wang, Yu-Chih
    Chiang, Chen-Hao
    Hong, Chih-Kai
    Su, Wei-Ren
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2019, 20 (1)
  • [7] Different suture anchor fixation techniques affect contact properties in humeral greater tuberosity fracture: a biomechanical study
    Cheng-Li Lin
    Ming-Long Yeh
    Fong-Chin Su
    Yu-Chih Wang
    Chen-Hao Chiang
    Chih-Kai Hong
    Wei-Ren Su
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 20
  • [8] Transosseous suture versus suture anchor fixation for inferior pole fractures of the patella in osteoporotic bone: a biomechanical study
    Jana Seggewiss
    Luis Fernando Nicolini
    Philipp Lichte
    Johannes Greven
    Marx Ribeiro
    Andreas Prescher
    Roman Michalik
    Christian Herren
    Philipp Kobbe
    Frank Hildebrand
    Miguel Pishnamaz
    European Journal of Medical Research, 27
  • [9] Transosseous suture versus suture anchor fixation for inferior pole fractures of the patella in osteoporotic bone: a biomechanical study
    Seggewiss, Jana
    Nicolini, Luis Fernando
    Lichte, Philipp
    Greven, Johannes
    Ribeiro, Marx
    Prescher, Andreas
    Michalik, Roman
    Herren, Christian
    Kobbe, Philipp
    Hildebrand, Frank
    Pishnamaz, Miguel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 27 (01)
  • [10] Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair
    Kim, DH
    ElAttrachet, NS
    Tibone, JE
    Jun, BJ
    DeLaMora, SN
    Kvitnet, RS
    Lee, TQ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (03): : 407 - 414