The importance of scattered trees for biodiversity conservation: A global meta-analysis

被引:96
|
作者
Prevedello, Jayme A. [1 ]
Almeida-Gomes, Mauricio [2 ]
Lindenmayer, David B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estado Rio de Janeiro, Dept Ecol, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Mato Grosso do Sul, Ctr Ciencias Biol & Saude, Campo Grande, Brazil
[3] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Canberra, ACT, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
arthropods; conservation planning; keystone structures; landscape; large old trees; plants; species abundance; species richness; vertebrates; REMNANT TREES; WOOD-PASTURES; VASCULAR EPIPHYTES; PADDOCK TREES; DIVERSITY; FOREST; VEGETATION; LANDSCAPE; VERACRUZ; BIRDS;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2664.12943
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Scattered trees are thought to be keystone structures for biodiversity in landscapes world-wide. However, such trees have been largely neglected by researchers and their importance for biodiversity remains unclear. We completed a global meta-analysis to quantify relationships between scattered trees and the species richness, abundance and composition of vertebrates, arthropods and plants. First, we tested whether areas near scattered trees support higher levels of species richness and abundance than nearby open areas. Second, we compared levels of species richness and abundance in matrix areas with scattered trees and areas embedded within nearby habitat patches. We also compared the composition of biological communities inhabiting habitat patches, open areas and areas with scattered trees. A total of 62 studies contained suitable data for our quantitative analyses. The local abundance of arthropods, vertebrates and woody plants was 60%-430% greater and overall species richness was 50%-100% higher in areas with scattered trees than in open areas. Conversely, for herbaceous plants, there was no consistent relationship between species abundance and the occurrence of scattered trees, although species richness was, on average, 43% lower. The abundance and richness of all taxonomic groups was similar in matrix areas supporting scattered trees and habitat patches, although the species richness of epiphytes was, on average, 50% higher in habitat patches. Communities inhabiting habitat patches were more similar in composition to the communities inhabiting areas with scattered trees, and less similar to the communities of open areas. Synthesis and applications. Areas with scattered trees support greater levels of biodiversity than open areas, as well as communities that are more similar to those inhabiting habitat patches. Scattered trees can be regarded as keystone structures for vertebrates, arthropods and terrestrial plants in landscapes world-wide. The maintenance of scattered trees may be compatible with livestock grazing in some agricultural landscapes. Greater management effort and targeted, long-term policies are needed to retain or re-establish scattered trees in many farming landscapes in both forest and non-forest biomes around the world.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 214
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Scattered trees are keystone structures - Implications for conservation
    Manning, Adrian D.
    Fischer, Joern
    Lindenmayer, David B.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2006, 132 (03) : 311 - 321
  • [22] On the importance of heterogeneity in meta-analysis
    Keefe, Stephen M.
    Strom, Brian L.
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2009, 6 (05) : 443 - 444
  • [23] Importance of meta-analysis in cardiology
    Castaigne, A
    THERAPIE, 1997, 52 (01): : 9 - 11
  • [24] Global synthesis of conservation studies reveals the importance of small habitat patches for biodiversity
    Wintle, Brendan A.
    Kujala, Heini
    Whitehead, Amy
    Cameron, Alison
    Veloz, Sam
    Kukkala, Aija
    Moilanen, Atte
    Gordon, Ascelin
    Lentini, Pia E.
    Cadenhead, Natasha C. R.
    Bekessy, Sarah A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2019, 116 (03) : 909 - 914
  • [25] A review and meta-analysis of collaborative research prioritization studies in ecology, biodiversity conservation and environmental science
    Dey, Cody J.
    Rego, Adam I.
    Midwood, Jonathan D.
    Koops, Marten A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 287 (1923)
  • [26] Biodiversity alleviates the decrease of grassland multifunctionality under grazing disturbance: A global meta-analysis
    Zhang, Ruiyang
    Tian, Dashuan
    Chen, Han Y. H.
    Seabloom, Eric W.
    Han, Guodong
    Wang, Shaopeng
    Yu, Guirui
    Li, Zhaolei
    Niu, Shuli
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2022, 31 (01): : 155 - 167
  • [27] Crop and landscape heterogeneity increase biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: A global review and meta-analysis
    Priyadarshana, Tharaka S.
    Martin, Emily A.
    Sirami, Clelia
    Woodcock, Ben A.
    Goodale, Eben
    Martinez-Nunez, Carlos
    Lee, Myung-Bok
    Pagani-Nunez, Emilio
    Raderschall, Chloe A.
    Brotons, Lluis
    Rege, Anushka
    Ouin, Annie
    Tscharntke, Teja
    Slade, Eleanor M.
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2024, 27 (03)
  • [28] Quantifying the impacts of ecological restoration on biodiversity and ecosystem services in agroecosystems: A global meta-analysis
    Paula Barral, Maria
    Rey Benayas, Jose Maria
    Meli, Paula
    Oscar Maceira, Nestor
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 202 : 223 - 231
  • [29] Global reforestation and biodiversity conservation
    Kemppinen, Krista M. S.
    Collins, Pamela M.
    Hole, David G.
    Wolf, Christopher
    Ripple, William J.
    Gerber, Leah R.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2020, 34 (05) : 1221 - 1228
  • [30] Global hotspot of Biodiversity and Conservation
    Santini, Luca
    Zhan, Aibin
    Bellard, Celine
    Benitez-Lopez, Ana
    Razgour, Orly
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2022, 28 (12)