Evaluation of contact precautions for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus

被引:18
|
作者
Bardossy, Ana Cecilia [1 ]
Alsafadi, Muhammad Yasser [2 ]
Starr, Patricia [3 ]
Chami, Eman [3 ]
Pietsch, Jennifer [3 ]
Moreno, Daniela [1 ]
Johnson, Laura [1 ]
Alangaden, George [1 ,4 ]
Zervos, Marcus [1 ,4 ]
Reyes, Katherine [1 ]
机构
[1] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Div Infect Dis, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[2] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Dept Internal Med, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[3] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Infect Prevent & Control, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[4] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Detroit, MI USA
关键词
Contact precautions; Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus; INFECTIONS; SETTINGS; IMPACT; VRE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajic.2017.06.017
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: There are limited controlled data demonstrating contact precautions (CPs) prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) infections in endemic settings. We evaluated changes in hospital-acquired MRSA and VRE infections after discontinuing CPs for these organisms. Methods: This is a retrospective study done at an 800-bed teaching hospital in urban Detroit. CPs for MRSA and VRE were discontinued hospital-wide in 2013. Data on MRSA and VRE catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), surgical site infections (SSIs), and hospital-acquired MRSA bacteremia (HA-MRSAB) rates were compared before and after CPs discontinuation. Results: There were 36,907 and 40,439 patients hospitalized during the two 12-month periods: CPs and no CPs. Infection rates in the CPs and no-CPs periods were as follows: (1) MRSA infections: VAP, 0.13 versus 0.11 (P = .84); CLABSI, 0.11 versus 0.19 (P = .45); SSI, 0 versus 0.14 (P = .50); and CAUTI, 0.025 versus 0.033 (P = .84); (2) VRE infections: CAUTI, 0.27 versus 0.13 (P = .19) and CLABSI, 0.29 versus 0.3 (P = .94); and (3) HA-MRSAB rates: 0.14 versus 0.11 (P = .55), respectively. Conclusions: Discontinuation of CPs did not adversely impact endemic MRSA and VRE infection rates. (c) 2017 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1369 / 1371
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS AND VANCOMYCIN-RESISTANT ENTEROCOCCUS CARRIAGE RATES IN A NEONATAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT
    Saygan, Sibel Bakir
    Yasar, Handan
    Eras, Zeynep
    Cesur, Salih
    Irmak, Hasan
    Dilmen, Ugur
    Demiroz, Ali Pekcan
    [J]. MIKROBIYOLOJI BULTENI, 2010, 44 (03): : 529 - 531
  • [32] In vitro susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium to daptomycin and other antibiotics
    Samra, Z.
    Ofir, O.
    Shmuely, H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2007, 26 (05) : 363 - 365
  • [33] Effect of Cessation of Contact Isolation for Endemic Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci
    Rupp, Mark E.
    Fitzgerald, Teresa
    Hayes, Kim
    Van Schooneveld, Trevor
    Hewlett, Angela
    Clevenger, Ryan
    Lyden, Elizabeth
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 38 (08): : 1005 - 1007
  • [34] In vitro antimicrobial activity of propolis against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium
    Kilic, A
    Baysallar, M
    Besirbellioglu, B
    Salih, B
    Sorkun, K
    Tanyuksel, M
    [J]. ANNALS OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 55 (02) : 113 - 117
  • [35] Independent risk factors for the co-colonization of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the region most endemic for vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolation
    Hayakawa, K.
    Marchaim, D.
    Bathina, P.
    Martin, E. T.
    Pogue, J. M.
    Sunkara, B.
    Kamatam, S.
    Ho, K.
    Willis, L. B.
    Ajamoughli, M.
    Patel, D.
    Khan, A.
    Lee, K. P.
    Suhrawardy, U.
    Jagadeesh, K. K.
    Reddy, S. M. L.
    Levine, M.
    Ahmed, F.
    Omotola, A. M.
    Mustapha, M.
    Moshos, J. A.
    Rybak, M. J.
    Kaye, K. S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2013, 32 (06) : 815 - 820
  • [36] Independent risk factors for the co-colonization of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the region most endemic for vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolation
    K. Hayakawa
    D. Marchaim
    P. Bathina
    E. T. Martin
    J. M. Pogue
    B. Sunkara
    S. Kamatam
    K. Ho
    L. B. Willis
    M. Ajamoughli
    D. Patel
    A. Khan
    K. P. Lee
    U. Suhrawardy
    K. K. Jagadeesh
    S. M. L. Reddy
    M. Levine
    F. Ahmed
    A. M. Omotola
    M. Mustapha
    J. A. Moshos
    M. J. Rybak
    K. S. Kaye
    [J]. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2013, 32 : 815 - 820
  • [37] Contact Precautions for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Are They Still Valuable?
    Jennifer Brown
    [J]. Current Emergency and Hospital Medicine Reports, 2014, 2 (4) : 189 - 195
  • [38] Contact Precautions for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Are They Still Valuable?
    Brown, Jennifer
    [J]. CURRENT EMERGENCY AND HOSPITAL MEDICINE REPORTS, 2014, 2 (04): : 189 - 195
  • [39] Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci: Therapeutic realities and possibilities
    Michel, M
    Gutmann, L
    [J]. LANCET, 1997, 349 (9069): : 1901 - 1906
  • [40] Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci co-colonization
    Furuno, JP
    Perencevich, EN
    Johnson, JA
    Wright, MO
    McGregor, JC
    Morris, JG
    Strauss, SM
    Roghman, MC
    Nemoy, LL
    Standiford, HC
    Hebden, JN
    Harris, AD
    [J]. EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2005, 11 (10) : 1539 - 1544