The Open Access initiative in scientific and biomedical publishing: Fourth in the series on editorship

被引:12
|
作者
Liesegang, TJ
Schachat, AP
Albert, DM
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ajo.2004.10.010
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To provide basic information about the Open Access concept and its historical development, define the benefits and challenges inherent in this new model, and identify the value of the traditional print model and its movement towards more open access. DESIGN: Review of current information on the subject from numerous sources. METHODS: Medline search and Internet search engines on the topic of Open Access Publishing. RESULTS: The Open Access initiative derives from several premises: medical libraries can no longer afford journal subscriptions; society benefits from the open exchange of ideas; society has in large part already paid for this research; the Internet provides an available venue. The traditional journal publishers model, how, ever, has functioned well over many years with a robust peer review system and increasing Internet digital components permitting search and cross referencing, including elements of the Open Access model. CONCLUSIONS: It will be difficult to maintain the costs of both the traditional journal system and the fully implemented Open Access model. Any decisions that are made must ensure that the archive of prior medical knowledge is not lost, that financial barriers do not restrict publication, and that research continues to be available to those who need it, in the media that they prefer. (C) 2005 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 167
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Readership awareness series - Paper 10: Open Access Publishing
    Ali, Mohammad Javed
    Djalilian, Ali
    [J]. OCULAR SURFACE, 2024, 33 : 35 - 36
  • [32] COVID-19 and the scientific publishing system: growth, open access and scientific fields
    Nane, Gabriela F.
    Robinson-Garcia, Nicolas
    van Schalkwyk, Francois
    Torres-Salinas, Daniel
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2023, 128 (01) : 345 - 362
  • [33] COVID-19 and the scientific publishing system: growth, open access and scientific fields
    Gabriela F. Nane
    Nicolas Robinson-Garcia
    François van Schalkwyk
    Daniel Torres-Salinas
    [J]. Scientometrics, 2023, 128 : 345 - 362
  • [34] SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHING Open access takes root at National Cancer Institute
    Kaiser, Jocelyn
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2019, 365 (6454) : 629 - 629
  • [35] THE GRAY ZONE BETWEEN LEGITIMATE AND PREDATORY OPEN ACCESS SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHING
    alvarado-de la Barrera, Claudia
    Avila-rios, Santiago
    Reyes-teran, Gustavo
    [J]. REVISTA DE INVESTIGACION CLINICA-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL INVESTIGATION, 2024, 76 (01): : 3 - 7
  • [36] Open Access: new models of scientific publishing in web 2.0 environments
    Veiga de Cabo, Jorge
    Martin-Rodero, Helena
    [J]. SALUD COLECTIVA, 2011, 7 : 19 - 27
  • [37] Open Access publishing and scholarly communications in non-scientific disciplines
    Eve, Martin Paul
    [J]. ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2015, 39 (05) : 717 - 732
  • [38] Open Access - Once more different - On the scientific publishing in the liberal arts
    Gradmann, Stefan
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR BIBLIOTHEKSWESEN UND BIBLIOGRAPHIE, 2007, 54 (4-5): : 170 - 173
  • [39] A reflection on open-access, citation counts, and the future of scientific publishing
    Bosch, Xavier
    [J]. ARCHIVUM IMMUNOLOGIAE ET THERAPIAE EXPERIMENTALIS, 2009, 57 (02) : 91 - 93
  • [40] Scientific publishing - Seeking advice on 'open access,' NIH gets an earful
    Kaiser, J
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2004, 305 (5685) : 764 - 764