Evaluating Patient Preferences of Maintenance Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Discrete Choice Experiment in the UK, USA and Germany

被引:9
|
作者
Lewis, Hannah B. [1 ]
Schroeder, Melanie [2 ]
Gunsoy, Necdet B. [3 ]
Janssen, Ellen M. [4 ]
Llewellyn, Samuel [5 ]
Doll, Helen A. [1 ]
Jones, Paul W. [6 ]
Ismaila, Afisi S. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] ICON Plc, Patient Centred Outcomes, London, England
[2] GlaxoSmithKline Plc, Value Evidence & Outcomes, Brentford, England
[3] GlaxoSmithKline Plc, Value Evidence & Outcomes, Uxbridge, Middx, England
[4] ICON Plc, Patient Centred Outcomes, Gaithersburg, MD USA
[5] ICON Plc, Patient Centred Outcomes, Abingdon, Oxon, England
[6] GlaxoSmithKline Plc, Resp Therapy Area, Brentford, England
[7] GlaxoSmithKline Plc, Value Evidence & Outcomes, 1250 South Collegeville Rd, Collegeville, PA 19426 USA
[8] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
discrete choice experiment; DCE; symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; COPD; stated-preference methods; TRIPLE THERAPY; COPD; HEALTH; VALIDITY; TIME;
D O I
10.2147/COPD.S221980
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: With increasing availability of different treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), we sought to understand patient preferences for COPD treatment in the UK, USA, and Germany using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Methods: Qualitative research identified six attributes associated with COPD maintenance treatments: ease of inhaler use, exacerbation frequency, frequency of inhaler use, number of different inhalers used, side effect frequency, and out-of-pocket costs. A DCE using these attributes, with three levels each, was designed and tested through cognitive interviews and piloting. It comprised 18 choice sets, selected using a D-efficient experimental design. Demographics and disease history were collected and the final DCE survey was completed online by participants recruited from panels in the UK, USA and Germany. Responses were analyzed using mixed logit models, with results expressed as odds ratios (ORs). Results: Overall, 450 participants (150 per country) completed the DCE; most (UK and Germany, 97.3%; USA, 98.0%) were included in the final analysis. Based on relative attribute importance, avoidance of side effects was found to be most important (UK: OR 11.65; USA: OR 7.17; Germany: OR 11.45; all p<0.0001), followed by the likelihood of fewer exacerbations (UK: OR 2.22; USA: OR 1.63; Germany . OR 2.54; all p<0.0001) and increased ease of use (UK: OR 1.84; USA: OR 1.84; Germany: OR 1.60; all p<0.0001). Number of inhalers, outof-pocket costs, and frequency of inhaler use were found to be less important. Preferences were relatively consistent across the three countries. All participants required a reduction in exacer-bations to accept more frequent inhaler use or use of more inhalers. Conclusion: When selecting COPD treatment, individuals assigned the highest value to the avoidance of side effects, experiencing fewer exacerbations, and ease of inhaler use. Ensuring that patients' preferences are considered may encourage treatment compliance.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 604
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Discrete Choice Experiment to Assess Patient Preferences for Asthma Rescue Therapy and Disease Management
    Israel, Elliot
    Farooqui, Nabeel
    Gillette, Chris
    Gilbert, Ileen
    Gandhi, Hitesh
    Tervonen, Tommi
    Balantac, Zaneta
    Thomas, Caitlin
    Krucien, Nicolas
    George, Maureen
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2023, 11 (09): : 2781 - +
  • [32] Patient preferences for the diagnosis of coeliac disease: A discrete choice experiment
    Shiha, Mohamed G.
    Wickramasekera, Nyantara
    Raju, Suneil A.
    Penny, Hugo A.
    Sanders, David S.
    UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [33] Patient Preferences in Subglottic Stenosis Treatment: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Naunheim, Matthew R.
    Naunheim, Margaret L.
    Rathi, Vinay K.
    Franco, Ramon A.
    Shrime, Mark G.
    Song, Phillip C.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2018, 158 (03) : 520 - 526
  • [34] Patient preferences for treatment of psoriasis with biologics: a discrete choice experiment
    Kromer, C.
    Schaarschmidt, M. -L.
    Schmieder, A.
    Herr, R.
    Goerdt, S.
    Peitsch, W. K.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2014, 171 (06) : E125 - E125
  • [35] Patient Preferences for Cholesterol Treatment Options: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Lewey, Jennifer
    Choudhry, Niteesh K.
    Gagne, Joshua J.
    Avorn, Jerry
    Najafzadeh, Mehdi
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2017, 26 : 157 - 157
  • [36] Patient preferences for treatment of psoriasis with biologicals: a discrete choice experiment
    Schaarschmidt, M. L.
    Kromer, C.
    Herr, R.
    Schmieder, A.
    Goerdt, S.
    Peitsch, W. K.
    EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, 2015, 24 (03) : E18 - E18
  • [37] Patient Preferences for Treatment of Psoriasis with Biologicals: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Kromer, Christian
    Schaarschmidt, Marthe-Lisa
    Schmieder, Astrid
    Herr, Raphael
    Goerdt, Sergij
    Peitsch, Wiebke K.
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (06):
  • [38] Patient preferences or management of high blood pressure in the UK: a discrete choice experiment
    Fletcher, Benjamin
    Hinton, Lisa
    McManus, Richard
    Rivero-Arias, Oliver
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2019, 69 (686): : E629 - E637
  • [39] Patient preferences in allergy immunotherapy (AIT) in Germany – a discrete-choice-experiment
    Kathrin Damm
    Janina Volk
    Andreas Horn
    Jean-Pierre Allam
    Ninette Troensegaard-Petersen
    Niels Serup-Hansen
    Thomas Winkler
    Ivonne Thiessen
    Kathrin Borchert
    Eike G. Wüstenberg
    Thomas Mittendorf
    Health Economics Review, 6
  • [40] Patient preferences in allergy immunotherapy (AIT) in Germany - a discrete-choice-experiment
    Damm, Kathrin
    Volk, Janina
    Horn, Andreas
    Allam, Jean-Pierre
    Troensegaard-Petersen, Ninette
    Serup-Hansen, Niels
    Winkler, Thomas
    Thiessen, Ivonne
    Borchert, Kathrin
    Wuestenberg, Eike G.
    Mittendorf, Thomas
    HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2016, 6