Regional citrate versus systemic heparin for anticoagulation in critically ill patients on continuous venovenous haemofiltration: a prospective randomized multicentre trial

被引:147
|
作者
Hetzel, Gerd R. [1 ]
Schmitz, Michael [1 ]
Wissing, Heimo [2 ]
Ries, Wolfgang [3 ]
Schott, Gabriele [4 ]
Heering, Peter J. [5 ]
Isgro, Frank [6 ]
Kribben, Andreas [7 ]
Himmele, Rainer
Grabensee, Bernd [1 ]
Rump, Lars C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dusseldorf, Fac Med, Dept Nephrol, D-4000 Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, Frankfurt, Germany
[3] Diakonissen Hosp Flensburg, Dept Med, Flensburg, Germany
[4] Helios Hosp Krefeld, Dept Nephrol, Krefeld, Germany
[5] Gen Hosp Solingen, Dept Nephrol, Solingen, Germany
[6] Gen Hosp Ludwigshafen, Dept Med, Ludwigshafen, Germany
[7] Univ Hosp Essen, Dept Nephrol, Essen, Germany
关键词
acute renal failure; anticoagulation; citrate; haemofiltration; ACUTE-RENAL-FAILURE; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; REPLACEMENT THERAPY; HEMODIALYSIS; RISK;
D O I
10.1093/ndt/gfq575
中图分类号
R3 [基础医学]; R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1001 ; 1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background. Continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVH) in the intensive care setting requires anticoagulation to prevent clotting of the extracorporeal circuit. Several protocols avoiding heparin and using regional citrate anticoagulation have been developed to diminish bleeding risks. However, data from randomized trials comparing citrate anticoagulation with systemic heparinization are very limited. Methods. One hundred and seventy-four patients on mechanical ventilation, requiring renal replacement therapy for acute renal failure, were included in this prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing regional citrate with systemic heparin. The study was performed at nine different intensive care units at university or academic teaching hospitals. The participants were randomized to either CVVH using regional citrate anticoagulation or CVVH using systemic anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin. The primary outcome was to compare treatment efficacy represented by the patients' acid base status on Day 3 and on each consecutive day. Several parameters of safety and efficacy were analysed as secondary outcomes. Results. Comparison of standard bicarbonate from Day 3 to Day 11 revealed no difference between both treatment modalities. Use of citrate resulted in less systemic anticoagulation, a lower risk of bleeding and a longer haemofilter patency. Episodes of hypercalcaemia, hypocalcaemia and the need for additional bicarbonate infusions occurred more often under citrate. The patients' high mortality was not influenced by the mode of anticoagulation. Conclusions. Citrate may be used as a regional anticoagulant and the only buffering agent in CVVH with adequate treatment efficacy and safety. However, neither citrate nor heparin anticoagulation should be regarded as a therapeutic standard, since there is no advantage of one of these substances with regard to patient mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 239
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Regional citrate versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement in critically ill patients
    Kutsogiannis, DJ
    Gibney, RTN
    Stollery, D
    Gao, J
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 67 (06) : 2361 - 2367
  • [2] A Randomized Controlled Trial of Regional Citrate Versus Regional Heparin Anticoagulation for Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Adults
    Gattas, David J.
    Rajbhandari, Dorrilyn
    Bradford, Celia
    Buhr, Heidi
    Lo, Serigne
    Bellomo, Rinaldo
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (08) : 1622 - 1629
  • [3] Customized Citrate Anticoagulation versus No Anticoagulant in Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ratanarat, Ranistha
    Phairatwet, Piyarat
    Khansompop, Suwimon
    Naorungroj, Thummaporn
    [J]. BLOOD PURIFICATION, 2023, 52 (05) : 455 - 463
  • [4] Regional citrate versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill children
    Sik, Guntulu
    Demirbuga, Asuman
    Annayev, Agageldi
    Citak, Agop
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2020, 43 (04): : 234 - 241
  • [5] REGIONAL CITRATE VERSUS SYSTEMIC HEPARIN ANTICOAGULATION FOR CONTINUOUS RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY IN CRITICALLY ILL CHILDREN
    Botan, E.
    Durak, A.
    Gun, E.
    Gurbanov, A.
    Balaban, B.
    Kahveci, F.
    Ozen, H.
    Ucmak, H.
    Gencay, A. G.
    Kendirli, T.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (11)
  • [6] Regional citrate versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (RICH) trial: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial
    Meersch, Melanie
    Kuellmar, Mira
    Wempe, Carola
    Kindgen-Milles, Detlef
    Kluge, Stefan
    Slowinski, Torsten
    Marx, Gernot
    Gerss, Joachim
    Zarbock, Alexander
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (01):
  • [7] A Retrospective Review of the Use of Regional Citrate Anticoagulation in Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration for Critically Ill Patients
    Leung, Anne Kit-Hung
    Shum, Hoi-Ping
    Chan, King-Chung
    Chan, Stanley Choi-Hung
    Lai, Kang Yiu
    Yan, Wing-Wa
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2013, 2013
  • [8] Citrate anticoagulation versus systemic heparinisation in continuous venovenous hemofiltration in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a multi-center randomized clinical trial
    Louise Schilder
    S Azam Nurmohamed
    Frank H Bosch
    Ilse M Purmer
    Sylvia S den Boer
    Cynthia G Kleppe
    Marc G Vervloet
    Albertus Beishuizen
    Armand RJ Girbes
    Pieter M ter Wee
    AB Johan Groeneveld
    [J]. Critical Care, 18
  • [9] Citrate anticoagulation versus systemic heparinisation in continuous venovenous hemofiltration in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a multi-center randomized clinical trial
    Schilder, Louise
    Nurmohamed, S. Azam
    Bosch, Frank H.
    Purmer, Ilse M.
    den Boer, Sylvia S.
    Kleppes, Cynthia G.
    Vervloet, Marc G.
    Beishuizen, Albertus
    Girbes, Armand R. J.
    ter Wee, Pieter M.
    Groeneveld, A. B. Johan
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2014, 18 (04):
  • [10] Regional citrate anticoagulation in continuous venovenous hemofiltration in critically ill patients with a high risk of bleeding
    Palsson, R
    Niles, JL
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 55 (05) : 1991 - 1997