A Randomized Controlled Trial of Regional Citrate Versus Regional Heparin Anticoagulation for Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Adults

被引:132
|
作者
Gattas, David J. [1 ,2 ]
Rajbhandari, Dorrilyn [1 ,2 ]
Bradford, Celia [3 ]
Buhr, Heidi [1 ]
Lo, Serigne [2 ]
Bellomo, Rinaldo [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Intens Care Serv, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
[2] George Inst Global Hlth, Crit Care & Trauma Div, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Royal N Shore Hosp, Dept Intens Care, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia
[4] Australian & New Zealand Intens Care Res Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Austin Hosp, Dept Intens Care, Melbourne, Vic 3084, Australia
关键词
continuous renal replacement therapy; intensive care; randomized controlled trial; regional citrate anticoagulation; CONTINUOUS VENOVENOUS HEMOFILTRATION; SYSTEMIC HEPARIN; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0000000000001004
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine whether regional anticoagulation of continuous renal replacement therapy circuits using citrate and calcium prolongs circuit life and/or affects circulating cytokine levels compared with regional anticoagulation using heparin and protamine. Design: Multicenter, parallel group randomized controlled trial. Setting: Seven ICUs in Australia and New Zealand. Patients: Critically ill adults requiring continuous renal replacement therapy. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive one of two methods of regional circuit anticoagulation: citrate and calcium or heparin and protamine. Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was functional circuit life measured in hours, assessed using repeated events survival analysis. In addition, we measured changes in interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and interleukin-10 blood levels. We randomized 212 subjects who were treated with 857 continuous renal replacement therapy circuits (median 2 circuits per patient [interquartile range, 1-6], 390 in citrate group vs 467 in heparin group). The groups were well matched for baseline characteristics. Patients receiving regional continuous renal replacement therapy anticoagulation with heparin and protamine were more likely to experience circuit clotting than those receiving citrate and calcium (hazard ratio, 2.03 [1.36-3.03]; p < 0.0005; 857 circuits). The median lifespan of the first study circuit in each patient was 39.2 hours (95% CI, 32.1-48.0 hr) in the citrate and calcium group versus 22.8 hours (95% CI, 13.3-34.0 hr) in the heparin and protamine group (log rank p = 0.0037, 204 circuits). Circuit anticoagulation with citrate and calcium had similar effects on cytokine levels compared with heparin and protamine anticoagulation. There were more adverse events in the group assigned to heparin and protamine anticoagulation (11 vs 2; p = 0.011). Conclusions: Regional citrate and calcium anticoagulation prolongs continuous renal replacement therapy circuit life compared with regional heparin and protamine anticoagulation, does not affect cytokine levels, and is associated with fewer adverse events.
引用
收藏
页码:1622 / 1629
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Regional citrate versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill children
    Sik, Guntulu
    Demirbuga, Asuman
    Annayev, Agageldi
    Citak, Agop
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2020, 43 (04): : 234 - 241
  • [2] REGIONAL CITRATE VERSUS SYSTEMIC HEPARIN ANTICOAGULATION FOR CONTINUOUS RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY IN CRITICALLY ILL CHILDREN
    Botan, E.
    Durak, A.
    Gun, E.
    Gurbanov, A.
    Balaban, B.
    Kahveci, F.
    Ozen, H.
    Ucmak, H.
    Gencay, A. G.
    Kendirli, T.
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (11)
  • [3] Regional citrate versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement in critically ill patients
    Kutsogiannis, DJ
    Gibney, RTN
    Stollery, D
    Gao, J
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 67 (06) : 2361 - 2367
  • [4] Regional citrate versus heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Li, Rui
    Gao, Xiang
    Zhou, Tao
    Li, Yunjie
    Wang, Jianhui
    Zhang, Peirong
    THERAPEUTIC APHERESIS AND DIALYSIS, 2022, 26 (06) : 1086 - 1097
  • [5] Regional citrate versus heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chao Liu
    Zhi Mao
    Hongjun Kang
    Jie Hu
    Feihu Zhou
    Critical Care, 20
  • [6] Regional citrate versus heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Liu, Chao
    Mao, Zhi
    Kang, Hongjun
    Hu, Jie
    Zhou, Feihu
    CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 20
  • [7] Regional Citrate Versus Heparin Anticoagulation for Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Wu, Mei-Yi
    Hsu, Yung-Ho
    Bai, Chyi-Huey
    Lin, Yuh-Feng
    Wu, Chih-Hsiung
    Tam, Ka-Wai
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2012, 59 (06) : 810 - 818
  • [8] Heparin versus citrate for anticoagulation in critically ill patients treated with continuous renal replacement therapy
    Tillman, Joanne
    NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2009, 14 (04) : 191 - 199
  • [9] Clinical impact of regional citrate anticoagulation in continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients
    Huguet, Maria
    Rodas, Lida
    Blasco, Miquel
    Quintana, Luis F.
    Mercadal, Jordi
    Ortiz-Perez, Jose T.
    Rovira, Irene
    Poch, Esteban
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2017, 40 (12): : 676 - 682
  • [10] Regional citrate versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (RICH) trial: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial
    Meersch, Melanie
    Kuellmar, Mira
    Wempe, Carola
    Kindgen-Milles, Detlef
    Kluge, Stefan
    Slowinski, Torsten
    Marx, Gernot
    Gerss, Joachim
    Zarbock, Alexander
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (01):