Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Goats

被引:3
|
作者
Minnig, Adrian [1 ]
Zufferey, Romane [1 ]
Thomann, Beat [2 ]
Zwygart, Sibylle [3 ]
Keil, Nina [3 ]
Schupbach-Regula, Gertraud [2 ]
Miserez, Raymond [4 ]
Stucki, Dimitri [1 ]
Zanolari, Patrik [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Vetsuisse Fac, Clin Ruminants, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bern, Vetsuisse Fac, Vet Publ Hlth Inst, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[3] Agroscope, Fed Food Safety & Vet Off, Ctr Proper Housing Ruminants & Pigs, CH-8356 Tanikon, Switzerland
[4] Consulting & Hlth Serv Small Ruminants, CH-3362 Niederonz, Switzerland
来源
ANIMALS | 2021年 / 11卷 / 11期
关键词
goat; small ruminant; animal-based; welfare assessment; welfare indicators; on-farm; QUALITATIVE BEHAVIOR ASSESSMENT; DAIRY GOATS; ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL; SMALL RUMINANTS; INTEROBSERVER RELIABILITY; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; SCORING SYSTEM; SHEEP; MASTITIS;
D O I
10.3390/ani11113138
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Simple Summary: Welfare assessments for animals require the use of specific indicators. These indicators should be practical and easy to use in an on-farm environment while correctly reflecting on the animals' welfare. Our aim was to review literature on such indicators for goats, as small ruminants have not received as much attention as other farm animals in the field of welfare assessment. Some indicators such as lameness are already well investigated and suitable for use in goat welfare assessments. Others, for example, lying behaviour, need more research, as the limited amount of knowledge restrains the information on validity or usefulness. As in other animals, the welfare of goats has become an increasingly important issue in public discourse. Our overview on indicators aids in developing tools to measure and improve the welfare of goats.<br>This review describes the current state of knowledge relating to scientific literature on welfare indicators for goats. Our aim was to provide an overview of animal-based indicators for on-farm welfare assessments. We performed a literature search and extracted 96 relevant articles by title, abstract, and full-text screening. Out of these articles, similar indicators were aggregated to result in a total of 32 welfare indicators, some of which were covered in multiple articles, others in only a single one. We discuss a set of three established assessment protocols containing these indicators, as well as all individual indicators which were covered in more than one article. As single indicators, we identified lameness, body condition score (BCS), qualitative behaviour assessment (QBA), and human-animal relationship (HAR) tests with substantial evidence for sufficient validity to assess welfare in goats. A multitude of indicators (e.g., hair coat condition) was studied less intensively but was successfully used for welfare assessments. For some indicators (e.g., oblivion, lying behaviour), we highlight the need for future research to further validate them or to optimise their use in on-farm welfare assessments. Moreover, further investigations need to include kids, bucks, and meat and fibre goats, as well as extensively kept goats as the literature predominantly focuses on dairy goats in intensive production systems.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Development and testing of an on-farm welfare assessment protocol for dairy goats
    Muri, K.
    Stubsjoen, S. M.
    Valle, P. S.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2013, 22 (03) : 385 - 400
  • [32] Bridging consumer perception and on-farm assessment of animal welfare
    Napolitano, F.
    De Rosa, G.
    Caporale, G.
    Carlucci, A.
    Grasso, F.
    Monteleone, E.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2007, 16 (02) : 249 - 253
  • [33] Assessment of behavior and physical condition of shelter cats as animal-based indicators of welfare
    Arhant, Christine
    Wogritsch, Ramona
    Troxler, Josef
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY BEHAVIOR-CLINICAL APPLICATIONS AND RESEARCH, 2015, 10 (05) : 399 - 406
  • [34] Monitoring the on-farm welfare of sheep and goats
    Caroprese, Mariangela
    Casamassima, Donato
    Rassu, Salvatore Pier Giacomo
    Napolitano, Fabio
    Sevi, Agostino
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2009, 8 : 343 - 354
  • [35] Using Expert Elicitation for ranking hazards, promoters and animal-based measures for on-farm welfare assessment of indoor reared beef cattle: an Italian experience
    Lorenzi, Valentina
    Rossi, Carlo Angelo Sgoifo
    Compiani, Riccardo
    Grossi, Silvia
    Bolzoni, Luca
    Mazza, Francesca
    Clemente, Gianfilippo Alessio
    Fusi, Francesca
    Bertocchi, Luigi
    VETERINARY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 47 (01) : 141 - 158
  • [36] Using Expert Elicitation for ranking hazards, promoters and animal-based measures for on-farm welfare assessment of indoor reared beef cattle: an Italian experience
    Valentina Lorenzi
    Carlo Angelo Sgoifo Rossi
    Riccardo Compiani
    Silvia Grossi
    Luca Bolzoni
    Francesca Mazza
    Gianfilippo Alessio Clemente
    Francesca Fusi
    Luigi Bertocchi
    Veterinary Research Communications, 2023, 47 : 141 - 158
  • [37] On-Farm Welfare Assessment Protocol for Adult Dairy Goats in Intensive Production Systems
    Battini, Monica
    Stilwell, George
    Vieira, Ana
    Barbieri, Sara
    Canali, Elisabetta
    Mattiello, Silvana
    ANIMALS, 2015, 5 (04): : 934 - 950
  • [38] Animal welfare assessment of on-farm euthanasia methods for individual, heavy turkeys
    Jacobs, Leonie
    Bourassa, Dianna, V
    Boyal, Ranjit S.
    Harris, Caitlin E.
    Josselson, L. Nicole Bartenfeld
    Campbell, Andrew
    Anderson, Gracie
    Buhr, R. Jeff
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2021, 100 (03)
  • [39] Qualitative assessment of animal behaviour as an on-farm welfare-monitoring tool
    Wemelsfelder, F
    Lawrence, AB
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2001, 51 : 21 - 25
  • [40] Animal Welfare Assessment in Sows and Piglets-Introduction of a New German Protocol for Farm's Self-Inspection and of New Animal-Based Indicators for Piglets
    Friedrich, Lena
    Krieter, Joachim
    Kemper, Nicole
    Czycholl, Irena
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2020, 10 (11): : 1 - 14