Priority during a meningitis epidemic: vaccination or treatment?

被引:0
|
作者
Veeken, H [1 ]
Ritmeijer, K [1 ]
Hausman, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Sans Frontieres Holland, Dept Med, NL-1001 EA Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
From November 1995 to May 1996 a meningitis epidemic occurred in northern Nigeria. More than 75000 cases and 8440 deaths (case fatality rate (CFR), 11%) were recorded. Medecins sans Frontieres, in cooperation with the Nigerian government, carried out an assistance programme (support to case management, surveillance and mass vaccination) in three stales (Bauchi, Kano, Katsina) where 75% of cases occurred. Cost analysis of this assistance in Katsina State reveals that case management and mass vaccination were efficient: US$ 35 per case treated and US$ 0.64 per vaccination. There was, however, a remarkable difference in cost-effectiveness between the two strategies. The cost per death averted by improved case treatment was estimated to be US$ 396 while the cost per death averted by vaccination was estimated to be US$ 6000, In large part this difference is attributed to the late start of vaccination: more than 6 weeks after the epidemic threshold had been passed. During meningitis epidemics in countries where surveillance systems are inadequate, such as in most of sub-Saharan Africa, curative programmes should have priority.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 141
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条