Modeling freight transportation preferences: Conjoint analysis for Turkish Region

被引:0
|
作者
Kofteci, Sevil [1 ]
Ergun, Murat [2 ]
Ay, H. Serpil [3 ]
机构
[1] Akdeniz Univ, Dept Civil Engn, TR-07058 Kampus Antalya, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Tech Univ, Dept Civil Engn, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Ege Univ, Dept Landscape Architecture, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
来源
SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND ESSAYS | 2010年 / 5卷 / 15期
关键词
Stated preference; conjoint analysis; intermodal transportation; modal choice; ELASTICITIES; CHOICE; DEMAND;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Conjoint analysis is a very popular method used to analyze the structure of consumers' preference. This technique is usually based on stated preference technique. Stated preferences experiments present individuals with hypothetical travel scenarios and seek their preferences. This paper reports the results of a conjoint analysis experiment performed in two Turkish Regions that estimates transportation managers' preferences for freight service attributes. According to results of analysis, the possibility that firms rely on intermodal transportation rather than on road transportation is evaluated. The research project focused on freight transportation demand by cement firms in the Antalya Region, Turkey. In the analysis, data related with the cement transported from City of Eskisehir to the City of Antalya and its surrounding area by road and intermodal transportation modes were used. These data were obtained in a survey conducted in 2007 with 50 cement merchants in Antalya. The empirical results show that time reliability is an important variable determining mode choice. Valuation of cost and time are generally lower than expected.
引用
收藏
页码:2016 / 2021
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Using conjoint analysis to evaluate health state preferences
    Szeinbach, SL
    Barnes, JH
    McGhan, WF
    Murawski, MM
    Corey, R
    [J]. DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 1999, 33 (03): : 849 - 858
  • [32] An Adaptive Conjoint Analysis of Freight Service Alternatives: Evaluating the Maritime Option
    Bergantino, Angela Stefania
    Bolis, Simona
    [J]. METHODS AND MODELS IN TRANSPORT AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS: CROSS ATLANTIC PERSPECTIVES, 2005, : 181 - 198
  • [33] A conjoint analysis of stated vaccine preferences in Shanghai, China
    Sun, Xiaodong
    Wagner, Abram L.
    Ji, Jiahui
    Huang, Zhuoying
    Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J.
    Boulton, Matthew L.
    Ren, Jia
    Prosser, Lisa A.
    [J]. VACCINE, 2020, 38 (06) : 1520 - 1525
  • [34] Exploring Guest Preferences of Breakfast Menu: Conjoint Analysis
    Lee, Seung Hyun
    Lee, Jaeyong
    Neilson, Sara M. F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CULINARY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 16 (02) : 149 - 164
  • [35] MODELING THE GLOBAL FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM: A MULTI-LEVEL MODELING PERSPECTIVE
    Halim, Ronald Apriliyanto
    Tavasszy, Lorant A.
    Seck, Mamadou D.
    [J]. 2012 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2012,
  • [36] A conjoint analysis of consumer preferences for vegetable products.
    MacKenzie, JEA
    Spiller, HB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 78 (05) : 1395 - 1395
  • [37] A selected review on the negative externalities of the freight transportation: Modeling and pricing
    Demir, Emrah
    Huang, Yuan
    Scholts, Sebastiaan
    Van Woensel, Tom
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2015, 77 : 95 - 114
  • [38] Modeling and control of an airship-mounted crane for freight transportation
    Ben Abdallah, Fida
    Hima, Salim
    Azouz, Naoufel
    Beji, Lotfi
    Abichou, Azgal
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2018, 51 (09): : 452 - 457
  • [39] Modeling Climate Change Impacts on Freight Transportation in Atlantic Canada
    Yevdokimov, Yuri
    [J]. TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION STUDIES, 2008, : 310 - 319
  • [40] Freight transportation demand elasticities: a geographic multimodal transportation network analysis
    Beuthe, M
    Jourquin, B
    Geerts, JF
    Ha, CKAN
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2001, 37 (04) : 253 - 266