Seismic response of dual concentrically braced steel frames with various bracing configurations

被引:5
|
作者
Seker, Onur [1 ]
机构
[1] Gebze Tech Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Kocaeli, Turkey
关键词
Steel dual systems; Bracing scheme; Nonlinear time-history analysis; Seismic response; Braced frames; Moment frames; NONSTRUCTURAL COMPONENTS; DESIGN; ACCELERATIONS; PERFORMANCE; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.107057
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Steel dual structures incorporating special concentrically braced frames (SCBFs) and special moment frames (SMFs) are, in general, effective for their high lateral stiffness and ductility. As such, ductile dual CBFs are often treated as a remedy for mitigating permanent drift demands along with the potential drift concentration in isolated stories. However, despite the benefits and interest, the effect of the bracing configuration on the seismic response of the dual concentrically braced systems, designed following the current capacity design approach stipulated in AISC Seismic Provisions, in particular, has not been thoroughly examined to date. The present study aims to shed light on the impact of the bracing scheme on the seismic behavior of dual SCBFs coupled with SMFs as backup frames. For this purpose, 4- and 10-story dual SCBFs with the commonly used chevron, split X, V, and cross X type bracing configurations are designed according to ASCE 7 and AISC 341. Then, the frames are subjected to a suite of ground motions. The nonlinear time-history analysis results are contrasted and discussed in terms of the peak and permanent drift demands, horizontal floor acceleration demands along with brace ductility demands.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Seismic assessment of concentrically braced steel frames with shape memory alloy braces
    McCormick, Jason
    DesRoches, Reginald
    Fugazza, Davide
    Auricchio, Ferdinando
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2007, 133 (06): : 862 - 870
  • [42] Optimum seismic design of concentrically braced steel frames: concepts and design procedures
    Moghaddam, H
    Hajirasouliha, I
    Doostan, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2005, 61 (02) : 151 - 166
  • [43] Evaluation of the seismic performance of suspended zipper column concentrically braced steel frames
    Wijesundara, K. K.
    Nascimbene, R.
    Rassati, Gian A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2018, 150 : 452 - 461
  • [44] Three-segment steel brace for seismic design of concentrically braced frames
    Seker, Onur
    Akbas, Bulent
    Seker, Pinar Toru
    Faytarouni, Mahmoud
    Shen, Jay
    Mahamid, Mustafa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2017, 137 : 211 - 227
  • [45] Seismic performance of concentrically braced steel frames in multistory buildings with mass irregularity
    Tremblay, R
    Poncet, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2005, 131 (09) : 1363 - 1375
  • [46] Effect of seismic resistance capacity of moment frames on progressive collapse response of concentrically braced dual systems
    Musavi-Z M.
    Sheidaii M.R.
    [J]. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2021, 22 (1) : 23 - 31
  • [47] Seismic response of stainless steel braced frames
    Di Sarno, L.
    Elnashai, A. S.
    Nethercot, D. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2008, 64 (7-8) : 914 - 925
  • [48] Steel Braced frames: Enhancing seismic response
    Fell, Benjamin
    Kanvinde, Amit
    [J]. Structural Engineer, 2009, 87 (21): : 22 - 26
  • [49] Seismic behaviour of dual steel concentric braced frames
    D'Aniello, M.
    Ambrosino, G. La Manna
    Portioli, F.
    Landolfo, R.
    [J]. STESSA 2012: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL STRUCTURES IN SEISMIC AREAS, 2012, : 889 - 895
  • [50] Seismic reliability of traditional and innovative concentrically braced frames
    Giugliano, Maria Teresa
    Longo, Alessandra
    Montuori, Rosario
    Piluso, Vincenzo
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2011, 40 (13): : 1455 - 1474