Hydrogen distribution and Passive Autocatalytic Recombiner (PAR) mitigation in a PWR-KWU containment type

被引:34
|
作者
Lopez-Alonso, Emma [1 ]
Papini, Davide [2 ]
Jimenez, Gonzalo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, Sch Ind Engn ETSII, Dept Energy Engn, Jose Gutierrez Abascal 2, Madrid 28006, Spain
[2] PSI, Nucl Energy & Safety Res Dept, Lab Thermal Hydraul, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland
关键词
MARK; PRESSURE; STEAM; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.anucene.2017.05.064
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
The evaluation of Passive Autocatalytic Recombiners (PARS) performance has been foreseen from the EU stress tests in the framework of a complementary and comprehensive review of the safety of the Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs). The study presented in this work analyses the size, location and number of the PARs to minimise the risk arising from a hydrogen release and its distribution in the containment building during a hypothetical severe accident. A detailed 3D model of a PWR-KWU containment type was used for the simulations. The numerical tool is the GOTHIC 8.1 containment code, which can model certain aspects of the system geometry and behaviour in more detail than typically considered in containment performance analysis. The severe accident scenario chosen is a fast release of hydrogen-steam mixture from hot leg creep rupture during SBO (Station Black-Out) accident. In the first place, the hydrogen preferential pathways and points of hydrogen accumulation were studied and identified starting from the base case scenario without any mitigation measure. Secondly, a configuration of PARs was simulated under the same conditions of the unmitigated case. The number of PARs considered is 40 units distributed all over the containment building. The PAR configuration offered an improvement in the chosen accidental scenario, decreasing the possibility of hydrogen combustion in all the containment compartments at the end of the transient. The analyses showed that this PAR configuration could lead to a reduction between 30-45% of the final hydrogen concentration. The hydrogen combustion risk is decreased with final hydrogen concentration values below the flammability limit (hydrogen concentration below 7%). Nonetheless, the analysis showed the inability of the PARs to recombine in the early stage of the fast release (the first 1-2 min in this sequence), due to their inertia and occurrence of oxygen starvation conditions. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:600 / 611
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [21] Hydrogen concentration prediction in a Passive Autocatalytic Recombiner using machine learning algorithms
    Kim, Won Jun
    Nguyen, Duc Hay
    Jeong, Jaehoon
    Park, Sung Goon
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 57 (05)
  • [22] A model of hydrogen passive autocatalytic recombiner and its validation via CFD simulations
    Orszulik, Magdalena
    Fic, Adam
    Bury, Tomasz
    Skladzien, Jan
    ARCHIVES OF THERMODYNAMICS, 2013, 34 (04) : 257 - 266
  • [23] Research on Hydrogen Elimination Performance of Passive Autocatalytic Recombiner of Reactor in Severe Accident
    Ding C.
    Zhou Z.
    Song M.
    Xia Z.
    Jiang S.
    Yang Z.
    Yuanzineng Kexue Jishu/Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2020, 54 (04): : 629 - 634
  • [24] Modelling of a Passive Catalytic Recombiner for Hydrogen Mitigation by CFD Methods
    Rozen, Antoni
    22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE NUCLEAR ENERGY FOR NEW EUROPE, (NENE 2013), 2013,
  • [25] Analysis of hydrogen risk mitigation with passive autocatalytic recombiner system in CPR1000 NPP during a hypothetical station blackout
    Huang, X. G.
    Yang, Y. H.
    Zhang, S. X.
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2011, 38 (12) : 2762 - 2769
  • [26] CFD modeling for hydrogen removal by a passive autocatalytic recombiner in oxygen-deficient conditions
    Kim, Jongtae
    Jung, Jaehoon
    Kim, Sang Ho
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 57 (01)
  • [27] Experimental Study on Hydrogen Recombination Characteristics of a Passive Autocatalytic Recombiner during Spray Operation
    Kim, Jongtae
    Hong, Seongho
    Park, Ki-Han
    Kim, Jin-Hyeok
    Oh, Jeong-Yun
    HYDROGEN, 2022, 3 (02): : 197 - 217
  • [28] Present status of hydrogen control and mitigation in a future PWR containment
    Petzold, KG
    Breitung, W
    JAHRESTAGUNG KERNTECHNIK 2000 - ANNUAL MEETING ON NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY 2000, 2000, : 219 - 223
  • [29] Determination of PAR configuration for PWR containment design: A hydrogen mitigation strategy (vol 42, pg 7104, 2017)
    Saghafi, Mandi
    Yousefpour, Faramarz
    Karimi, Kaveh
    Hoseyni, Seyed Mohsen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2018, 43 (04) : 2524 - 2524
  • [30] Proposed methodology for Passive Autocatalytic Recombiner sizing and location for a BWR Mark-III reactor containment building
    Serrano, Cesar
    Jimenez, Gonzalo
    del Carmen Molina, Ma
    Lopez-Alonso, Emma
    Justo, Daniel
    Vicente Zuriaga, J.
    Gonzalez, Montserrat
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2016, 94 : 589 - 602