The winners and losers of tax reform: An assessment under financial integration

被引:0
|
作者
Kabukcuoglu, Ayse [1 ]
机构
[1] Koc Univ, Coll Adm Sci & Econ, Rumelifeneri Yolu, TR-34450 Istanbul, Turkey
来源
关键词
Taxation; Wealth inequality; Heterogeneous agent-incomplete markets models; Financial integration; CAPITAL INCOME; GROWTH-MODEL; TAXATION; DEBT; CONSTRAINTS; INEQUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jedc.2017.09.009
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
I quantify the macroeconomic and redistributive effects of the unilateral elimination of the capital income tax in a two-country, heterogeneous-agent incomplete markets model with progressive labor income taxes. Home, by implementing the reform, induces government responses where labor income is taxed in Home and mostly subsidized in Foreign. In addition, post-reform price dynamics reduce Home's wealth and suppress households' ability to do consumption smoothing, with negative effects on the majority particularly on the poor. In turn, Foreign accumulates wealth, and price movements work particularly in favor of the poor. As a result, a large majority in Home prefers the status quo whereas Foreign supports the reform unanimously. These findings are robust to alternative scenarios where (i) the borrowing constraints are relaxed, (ii) both countries jointly eliminate capital income taxes, (iii) foreign interest income is taxed, and (iv) Home capital income tax is reduced from 40% to 35%. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 122
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Winners and losers from an announced durable tax hike: Tesla in Denmark
    Asplund, Marcus
    Jinkins, David
    Lutz, Chandler
    Paizs, Gyorgy
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2019, 51 (07) : 722 - 730
  • [22] Predicting invasion winners and losers under climate change
    Buckley, Yvonne M.
    Csergo, Anna M.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2017, 114 (16) : 4040 - 4041
  • [23] International Outsourcing Under Monopolistic Competition: Winners and Losers
    Do, Viet
    Van Long, Ngo
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY AND EMERGING ISSUES IN TRADE THEORY AND POLICY, 2008, 4 : 345 - 366
  • [24] WINNERS AND LOSERS UNDER THE ROBINSON-PATMAN ACT
    ROSS, TW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1984, 27 (02): : 243 - 271
  • [25] Winners or losers? Workers in transition economies under globalisation
    Petreski, Marjan
    [J]. POST-COMMUNIST ECONOMIES, 2020, 32 (04) : 468 - 494
  • [26] Winners and losers of the COVID-19 pandemic: An excess profits tax proposal
    Azemar, Celine
    Desbordes, Rodolphe
    Melindi-Ghidi, Paolo
    Nicolai, Jean-Philippe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMIC THEORY, 2022, 24 (05) : 1016 - 1038
  • [27] Globalization and Economic Integration. Winners and Losers in the Asia-Pacific
    Pestieau, Joseph
    [J]. ETUDES INTERNATIONALES, 2012, 43 (04): : 633 - 635
  • [28] When Winners Feel Like Losers: Evidence from an Energy Subsidy Reform
    Calvo-Gonzalez, Oscar
    Cunha, Barbara
    Trezzi, Riccardo
    [J]. WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2017, 31 (02): : 329 - 350
  • [29] The reform of pension systems: Winners and losers across generations in the United Kingdom and Germany
    Miles, D
    Iben, A
    [J]. ECONOMICA, 2000, 67 (266) : 203 - 228
  • [30] Strategic Voting and Legislative Redistricting Reform District and Statewide Representational Winners and Losers
    Tolbert, Caroline J.
    Smith, Daniel A.
    Green, John C.
    [J]. POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2009, 62 (01) : 92 - 109