Magnetic resonance imaging versus intracoronary Doppler guide wire in the assessment of coronary flow reserve in patients with coronary artery disease

被引：0
|
作者：
Bedaux, W
Beek, AM
Hofman, MBM
de Cock, CC
Stoel, MA
Visser, CA
van Rossum, AC
机构：
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] AZVU, Dept Cardiol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] AZVU, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源：
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL | 2001年 / 22卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：22 / 22
页数：1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] CORONARY FLOW RESERVE BY DOPPLER WIRE IS NOT EQUIVALENT TO STENOTIC FLOW RESERVE
    LIEBERMAN, SM
    UNDEMIR, C
    SHAKNOVICH, A
    WILENTZ, JR
    FRIEDMAN, MS
    HIGGINS, J
    COHEN, NT
    MCCROSSAN, J
    MOSES, JW
    CIRCULATION, 1993, 88 (04) : 204 - 204
  • [42] Intracoronary Doppler flow reserve correlates with myocardial perfusion reserve: Assessment with quantitative magnetic resonance first pass imaging
    Wilke, N
    JeroschHerold, M
    Wang, Y
    Stillman, A
    Wilson, RF
    CIRCULATION, 1996, 94 (08) : 2429 - 2429
  • [43] Coronary flow reserve measurement by guide wire-based thermodilution: Comparison to the Doppler wire
    Pijls, NHJ
    De Bruyne, B
    Bech, GJW
    van de Vosse, F
    Billet, F
    Kusters, H
    van Gelder, LM
    Nelis, O
    Bartunek, J
    Bonnier, JJRM
    Koolen, JJ
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2000, 21 : 34 - 34
  • [44] Coronary flow reserve measurement by guide wire based thermodilution: Comparison to the Doppler wire.
    Pijls, NHJ
    Bruyne, B
    Bech, JW
    Vosse, F
    Billet, F
    Kusters, H
    Gelder, B
    Nelis, O
    Bartunek, J
    Bonnier, H
    Koolen, J
    CIRCULATION, 2000, 102 (18) : 410 - 410
  • [45] Quantitative myocardial perfusion assessment with magnetic resonance Imaging in patients with coronary artery disease
    Gramovich, VV
    Sinitsyn, VE
    Gordin, MP
    Stukalova, OV
    Samko, AN
    Ustyuzhanin, DV
    Ternovoy, SK
    KARDIOLOGIYA, 2004, 44 (08) : 4 - 12
  • [46] Comparison of magnetic resonance perfusion imaging versus invasive fractional flow reserve for assessment of the hemodynamic significance of epicardial coronary artery stenosis
    Kuehl, Harald P.
    Katoh, Marcus
    Buhr, Christiane
    Krombach, Gabriele A.
    Hoffmann, Rainer
    Rassaf, Tienush
    Neizel, Mirja
    Buecker, Arno
    Kelm, Malte
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 99 (08): : 1090 - 1095
  • [47] Coronary Flow Reserve by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus
    Kato, Shingo
    Fukui, Kazuki
    Saigusa, Yusuke
    Kubota, Kazumi
    Kodama, Sho
    Asahina, Naoki
    Hayakawa, Keigo
    Iguchi, Kohei
    Fukuoka, Masahiro
    Iwasawa, Tae
    Utsunomiya, Daisuke
    Kosuge, Masami
    Kimura, Kazuo
    Tamura, Kouichi
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2019, 12 (12) : 2579 - 2580
  • [48] Comparison of Myocardial Transmural Perfusion Gradient by Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease
    Pan, Jingwei
    Huang, Siyi
    Lu, Zhigang
    Li, Jingbo
    Wan, Qing
    Zhang, Jiayin
    Gao, Chengjie
    Yang, Xin
    Wei, Meng
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 115 (10): : 1333 - 1340
  • [49] Comparison of coronary angiography and intracoronary imaging with fractional flow reserve for coronary artery disease evaluation: An anatomical-functional mismatch
    Adjedj, Julien
    Stoyanov, Nikolay
    Muller, Olivier
    ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 20 (03): : 182 - 189
  • [50] Assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve with phase-contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging in patients with heavy coronary calcification
    Higashikawa, Takatoshi
    Ichikawa, Yasutaka
    Ishida, Masaki
    Kitagawa, Kakuya
    Hirano, Tadanori
    Sakuma, Hajime
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2019, 35 (05): : 897 - 905
12345