Systematic reviews and meta-analytic techniques

被引:12
|
作者
Baird, Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Pediat Gen Surg, BCCH Surg, Ambulatory Care Bldg,K0-134,4480 Oak St, Vancouver, BC V6H 3V4, Canada
关键词
Systematic review; Meta-analysis; CHILDREN; QUALITY; INFANTS;
D O I
10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2018.10.009
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Systematic reviews (SRs) are a form of research methodology that addresses a specific research question by collecting, appraising and summarising all empirical evidence that fits pre-specified eligibility criteria. Systematic reviews have grown exponentially since their emergence in the late 1970 s as evidence-based medicine permeated medical culture. With several key advantages and limitations inherent to their design, all health care providers should be familiar with their basic structure, how to critically appraise them, and how to incorporate their findings into clinical practice. This review will contextualise systematic reviews within the broader framework of other review types, and outline the steps in conducting or appraising a systematic review. This includes the framing of an appropriate question, the search strategy, appraisal of included studies, as well as synthesis and analysis of the acquired data. A focus on SRs in the context of pediatric surgical practice will be emphasized. A concise primer on meta-analytic techniques is also provided, with resources highlighted for further reading. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:338 / 344
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Systematic Reviews and Meta-analytic Methods: Not All Are Created Equal
    Alavi, Karim
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2018, 61 (11) : 1241 - 1242
  • [2] Meta-analytic Reviews in the Organizational Sciences: Two Meta-analytic Schools on the Way to MARS (the Meta-analytic Reporting Standards)
    Kepes, Sven
    McDaniel, Michael A.
    Brannick, Michael T.
    Banks, George C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 28 (02) : 123 - 143
  • [3] Meta-analytic Reviews in the Organizational Sciences: Two Meta-analytic Schools on the Way to MARS (the Meta-analytic Reporting Standards)
    Sven Kepes
    Michael A. McDaniel
    Michael T. Brannick
    George C. Banks
    [J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2013, 28 : 123 - 143
  • [4] Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods
    Jakobsen, Janus Christian
    Wetterslev, Jorn
    Winkel, Per
    Lange, Theis
    Gluud, Christian
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2014, 14
  • [5] Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods
    Janus Christian Jakobsen
    Jørn Wetterslev
    Per Winkel
    Theis Lange
    Christian Gluud
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14
  • [6] A REVIEW OF META-ANALYTIC TECHNIQUES
    BRINBERG, D
    JACCARD, J
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1986, 13 : 606 - 611
  • [7] Narrative, meta-analytic, and systematic reviews: What are the differences and why do they matter?
    Hodgkinson, Gerard P.
    Ford, J. Kevin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2014, 35 : S1 - S5
  • [8] The Multifaceted Role of Emotion Regulation in Suicidality: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analytic Evidence
    Rogier, Guyonne
    Chiorri, Carlo
    Zobel, Sara Beomonte
    Muzi, Stefania
    Pace, Cecilia Serena
    Cheung, Mike W. -L.
    Velotti, Patrizia
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2024, 150 (01) : 45 - 81
  • [9] A CALL FOR CAUTIOUS INTERPRETATION OF META-ANALYTIC REVIEWS
    Boers, Frank
    Bryfonski, Lara
    Faez, Farahnaz
    McKay, Todd
    [J]. STUDIES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, 2021, 43 (01) : 2 - 24
  • [10] Striving for Complementarity Between Narrative and Meta-Analytic Reviews
    Han, ZhaoHong
    [J]. APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2015, 36 (03) : 409 - 415